COTY
Price
$4.85
Change
+$0.13 (+2.75%)
Updated
Aug 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.12B
8 days until earnings call
NUS
Price
$11.14
Change
+$0.56 (+5.29%)
Updated
Aug 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
523.69M
78 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

COTY vs NUS

Header iconCOTY vs NUS Comparison
Open Charts COTY vs NUSBanner chart's image
COTY
Price$4.85
Change+$0.13 (+2.75%)
Volume$65.5K
Capitalization4.12B
NuSkin Enterprises
Price$11.14
Change+$0.56 (+5.29%)
Volume$5.04K
Capitalization523.69M
COTY vs NUS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
COTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
COTY vs. NUS commentary
Aug 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COTY is a Buy and NUS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 12, 2025
Stock price -- (COTY: $4.72 vs. NUS: $10.58)
Brand notoriety: COTY and NUS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COTY: 57% vs. NUS: 245%
Market capitalization -- COTY: $4.12B vs. NUS: $523.69M
COTY [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $4.12B. NUS’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $523.69M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $363.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $21.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COTY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNUS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • COTY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NUS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NUS is a better buy in the long-term than COTY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COTY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NUS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COTY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • NUS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NUS is a better buy in the short-term than COTY.

Price Growth

COTY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а -0.84% price change this week, while NUS (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +27.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

COTY is expected to report earnings on Aug 20, 2025.

NUS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+1.59% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COTY($4.12B) has a higher market cap than NUS($524M). COTY has higher P/E ratio than NUS: COTY (37.14) vs NUS (5.21). NUS YTD gains are higher at: 55.891 vs. COTY (-32.184). COTY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 273M vs. NUS (46.4M). COTY has more cash in the bank: 244M vs. NUS (214M). NUS has less debt than COTY: NUS (301M) vs COTY (4.09B). COTY has higher revenues than NUS: COTY (6B) vs NUS (1.68B).
COTYNUSCOTY / NUS
Capitalization4.12B524M786%
EBITDA273M46.4M588%
Gain YTD-32.18455.891-58%
P/E Ratio37.145.21713%
Revenue6B1.68B358%
Total Cash244M214M114%
Total Debt4.09B301M1,358%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
COTY vs NUS: Fundamental Ratings
COTY
NUS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6110
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95100
SMR RATING
1..100
9492
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8238
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3431
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NUS's Valuation (34) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COTY (80). This means that NUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than COTY’s over the last 12 months.

COTY's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as NUS (100). This means that COTY’s stock grew similarly to NUS’s over the last 12 months.

NUS's SMR Rating (92) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as COTY (94). This means that NUS’s stock grew similarly to COTY’s over the last 12 months.

NUS's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is somewhat better than the same rating for COTY (82). This means that NUS’s stock grew somewhat faster than COTY’s over the last 12 months.

NUS's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as COTY (34). This means that NUS’s stock grew similarly to COTY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COTYNUS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NUS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYVVX85.84N/A
N/A
Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value C
RSPFX27.37N/A
N/A
Victory RS Partners A
MASMX9.98N/A
N/A
Madison Small Cap A
JENRX59.46N/A
N/A
Jensen Quality Growth R
MCRTX58.30N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Insight R6

COTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COTY has been loosely correlated with EL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COTY jumps, then EL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To COTY
1D Price
Change %
COTY100%
-0.42%
EL - COTY
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
LRLCY - COTY
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
IPAR - COTY
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
SPB - COTY
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
EPC - COTY
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More

NUS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NUS and NWL have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NUS and NWL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NUS
1D Price
Change %
NUS100%
+18.48%
NWL - NUS
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
ELF - NUS
33%
Poorly correlated
+9.73%
COTY - NUS
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
IPAR - NUS
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
SPB - NUS
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
More