COTY vs TANH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COTY is a Hold and TANH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
COTY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTANH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- COTY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TANH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
COTY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TANH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- COTY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
- TANH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
COTY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а +7.05% price change this week, while TANH (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +4.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.98%.
Reported Earning Dates
COTY is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.
TANH is expected to report earnings on Dec 28, 2022.
Industries' Descriptions
@Household/Personal Care (+1.23% weekly)Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.
| COTY | TANH | COTY / TANH | |
| Capitalization | 10.6B | 2.62M | 404,580% |
| EBITDA | 1.22B | -9.46M | -12,944% |
| Gain YTD | 2.586 | -19.621 | -13% |
| P/E Ratio | 33.97 | 0.50 | 6,745% |
| Revenue | 6.01B | 42.3M | 14,208% |
| Total Cash | 450M | 37.1M | 1,213% |
| Total Debt | 4.01B | 8.68M | 46,125% |
COTY | TANH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TANH's Valuation (71) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as COTY (90) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that TANH’s stock grew similarly to COTY’s over the last 12 months.
TANH's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as COTY (100) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that TANH’s stock grew similarly to COTY’s over the last 12 months.
TANH's SMR Rating (83) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as COTY (84) in the Household Or Personal Care industry. This means that TANH’s stock grew similarly to COTY’s over the last 12 months.
COTY's Price Growth Rating (63) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is in the same range as TANH (64) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that COTY’s stock grew similarly to TANH’s over the last 12 months.
COTY's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Household Or Personal Care industry is significantly better than the same rating for TANH (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that COTY’s stock grew significantly faster than TANH’s over the last 12 months.
| COTY | TANH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 81% | 11 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 78% | 11 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 77% | 11 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 80% | 11 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 74% | 13 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 79% | 11 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 73% | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TSLY | 14.49 | 0.31 | +2.19% |
| YieldMax TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| BRNY | 42.81 | 0.33 | +0.77% |
| Burney U.S. Factor Rotation ETF | |||
| MFEM | 18.82 | 0.12 | +0.67% |
| PIMCO RAFI Dyn Mlt-Fctr Emrg Mkts Eq ETF | |||
| BCIM | 20.98 | 0.06 | +0.28% |
| abrdn Blmb Indstl Mtls Stgy K1 Fr ETF | |||
| VCIT | 80.23 | 0.04 | +0.05% |
| Vanguard Interm-Term Corp Bd ETF | |||
COTY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COTY has been loosely correlated with LRLCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if COTY jumps, then LRLCY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COTY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COTY | 100% | -0.83% | ||
| LRLCY - COTY | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| IPAR - COTY | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| EL - COTY | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| BDRFY - COTY | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| LRLCF - COTY | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.71% | ||
More | ||||
TANH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TANH and COTY have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TANH and COTY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TANH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TANH | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| COTY - TANH | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
| HIMS - TANH | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.32% | ||
| NUS - TANH | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| CL - TANH | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
| KMB - TANH | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.45% | ||
More | ||||