Advertisement
COWG vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a Hold and LRCX is a StrongBuy.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 46 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 16 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| COWG | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 68% | 10 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FFOG | 48.14 | 0.59 | +1.24% |
| Franklin Focused Growth ETF | |||
| OEF | 339.45 | 3.16 | +0.94% |
| iShares S&P 100 ETF | |||
| MEGI | 14.82 | 0.03 | +0.17% |
| NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Megatrends Term Fund | |||
| IBGL | 25.37 | N/A | +0.02% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Trsy ETF | |||
| IBIJ | 26.34 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares iBonds Oct 2033 Term Tips ETF | |||
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with KEYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then KEYS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| KEYS - COWG | 75% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| CRWD - COWG | 74% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| ZS - COWG | 73% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| KLAC - COWG | 72% Closely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| LRCX - COWG | 71% Closely correlated | +2.81% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | +2.81% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 92% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 90% Closely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| VECO - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| RMBS - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | +3.75% | ||
| ENTG - LRCX | 79% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
More | ||||