Advertisement
COWG vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COWG is a Hold and LRCX is a Hold.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 17 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 10 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| COWG | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XLV | 155.26 | 0.65 | +0.42% |
| The Health Care Select Sector SPDR® ETF | |||
| JCPI | 48.71 | 0.06 | +0.12% |
| JPMorgan Inflation Managed Bond ETF | |||
| BSMP | 24.50 | N/A | N/A |
| Invesco BulletShares 2025 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| CVAR | 27.42 | N/A | N/A |
| Cultivar ETF | |||
| QUSA | 17.92 | -0.26 | -1.43% |
| Vistashares Target 15 Usa Quality Income ETF | |||
COWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, COWG has been closely correlated with KEYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if COWG jumps, then KEYS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To COWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COWG | 100% | +1.82% | ||
| KEYS - COWG | 76% Closely correlated | +2.87% | ||
| CRWD - COWG | 74% Closely correlated | +3.29% | ||
| ZS - COWG | 74% Closely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| MPWR - COWG | 74% Closely correlated | +2.36% | ||
| KLAC - COWG | 73% Closely correlated | +3.61% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | +5.42% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 92% Closely correlated | +3.08% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 91% Closely correlated | +3.61% | ||
| VECO - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | +2.34% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| RMBS - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | +5.08% | ||
More | ||||