CPAC
Price
$5.94
Change
-$0.04 (-0.67%)
Updated
Jun 6, 12:57 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
523.15M
41 days until earnings call
CX
Price
$6.71
Change
-$0.09 (-1.32%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.14B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPAC vs CX

Header iconCPAC vs CX Comparison
Open Charts CPAC vs CXBanner chart's image
Cementos Pacasmayo SAA
Price$5.94
Change-$0.04 (-0.67%)
Volume$128
Capitalization523.15M
Cemex SAB de CV
Price$6.71
Change-$0.09 (-1.32%)
Volume$91.27K
Capitalization13.14B
CPAC vs CX Comparison Chart
Loading...
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPAC vs. CX commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAC is a StrongBuy and CX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CPAC: $5.98 vs. CX: $6.73)
Brand notoriety: CPAC: Not notable vs. CX: Notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPAC: 22% vs. CX: 54%
Market capitalization -- CPAC: $523.15M vs. CX: $13.14B
CPAC [@Construction Materials] is valued at $523.15M. CX’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $13.14B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CPAC is a better buy in the long-term than CX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CPAC (@Construction Materials) experienced а +2.57% price change this week, while CX (@Construction Materials) price change was -1.75% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +1.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

CX is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+1.02% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CX($13.1B) has a higher market cap than CPAC($523M). CX has higher P/E ratio than CPAC: CX (73.74) vs CPAC (11.27). CX YTD gains are higher at: 19.735 vs. CPAC (14.340). CX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.72B vs. CPAC (476M). CX has more cash in the bank: 533M vs. CPAC (186M). CPAC has less debt than CX: CPAC (6.99M) vs CX (9.16B). CX has higher revenues than CPAC: CX (17B) vs CPAC (1.97B).
CPACCXCPAC / CX
Capitalization523M13.1B4%
EBITDA476M1.72B28%
Gain YTD14.34019.73573%
P/E Ratio11.2773.7415%
Revenue1.97B17B12%
Total Cash186M533M35%
Total Debt6.99M9.16B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPAC vs CX: Fundamental Ratings
CPAC
CX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2380
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4147
SMR RATING
1..100
5163
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPAC's Valuation (2) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (18). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (47). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's SMR Rating (51) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (63). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (46). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CX (98). This means that CPAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PVFYX23.43N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Core Equity Y
RFISX17.30N/A
N/A
Ranger Small Cap Institutional
CIRRX17.66N/A
N/A
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities R
AGGIX12.26N/A
N/A
American Century Focused Global Gr I
MENAX8.66N/A
N/A
Madison Covered Call & Equity Income A

CPAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPAC and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPAC and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPAC
1D Price
Change %
CPAC100%
N/A
HCMLY - CPAC
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.90%
USLM - CPAC
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
BCC - CPAC
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
CX - CPAC
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
JHX - CPAC
1%
Poorly correlated
+4.11%
More