CPAC
Price
$6.32
Change
-$0.01 (-0.16%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
541.98M
55 days until earnings call
CX
Price
$8.93
Change
-$0.04 (-0.45%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
12.96B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPAC vs CX

Header iconCPAC vs CX Comparison
Open Charts CPAC vs CXBanner chart's image
Cementos Pacasmayo SAA
Price$6.32
Change-$0.01 (-0.16%)
Volume$2.48K
Capitalization541.98M
Cemex SAB de CV
Price$8.93
Change-$0.04 (-0.45%)
Volume$9.08M
Capitalization12.96B
CPAC vs CX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CPAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPAC vs. CX commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAC is a StrongBuy and CX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CPAC: $6.32 vs. CX: $8.93)
Brand notoriety: CPAC: Not notable vs. CX: Notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPAC: 32% vs. CX: 74%
Market capitalization -- CPAC: $541.98M vs. CX: $12.96B
CPAC [@Construction Materials] is valued at $541.98M. CX’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $12.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $76.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $10.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CPAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CX is a better buy in the long-term than CPAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CPAC is a better buy in the short-term than CX.

Price Growth

CPAC (@Construction Materials) experienced а +1.94% price change this week, while CX (@Construction Materials) price change was +3.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

CX is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+0.48% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CX($13B) has a higher market cap than CPAC($542M). CX has higher P/E ratio than CPAC: CX (14.74) vs CPAC (9.20). CX YTD gains are higher at: 59.392 vs. CPAC (20.843). CX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.76B vs. CPAC (459M). CX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. CPAC (80.6M). CPAC has less debt than CX: CPAC (16.5M) vs CX (7.36B). CX has higher revenues than CPAC: CX (15.7B) vs CPAC (2.03B).
CPACCXCPAC / CX
Capitalization542M13B4%
EBITDA459M1.76B26%
Gain YTD20.84359.39235%
P/E Ratio9.2014.7462%
Revenue2.03B15.7B13%
Total Cash80.6M1.17B7%
Total Debt16.5M7.36B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPAC vs CX: Fundamental Ratings
CPAC
CX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2424
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5743
SMR RATING
1..100
5163
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6998
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPAC's Valuation (2) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (21). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CX's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CPAC (57). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's SMR Rating (51) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (63). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

CX's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CPAC (46). This means that CX’s stock grew similarly to CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as CX (98). This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to CX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPACCX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCPIX52.91N/A
N/A
DWS S&P 500 Index S
HICGX34.09N/A
N/A
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Inst
VGIRX15.90N/A
N/A
Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Infras R6
VKSGX10.71N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Value R6
TMAPX56.34N/A
N/A
Touchstone Mid Cap A

CPAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPAC and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPAC and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPAC
1D Price
Change %
CPAC100%
-0.16%
HCMLY - CPAC
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
USLM - CPAC
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
RETO - CPAC
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
CAPT - CPAC
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.50%
CX - CPAC
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
More