CPAC
Price
$5.55
Change
+$0.05 (+0.91%)
Updated
Apr 28, 01:34 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
523.15M
Earnings call today
HCMLY
Price
$22.25
Change
+$0.28 (+1.27%)
Updated
Apr 25 closing price
Capitalization
39.08B
94 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CPAC vs HCMLY

Header iconCPAC vs HCMLY Comparison
Open Charts CPAC vs HCMLYBanner chart's image
Cementos Pacasmayo SAA
Price$5.55
Change+$0.05 (+0.91%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization523.15M
HOLCIM
Price$22.25
Change+$0.28 (+1.27%)
Volume$48.96K
Capitalization39.08B
CPAC vs HCMLY Comparison Chart
Loading...
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CPAC vs. HCMLY commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPAC is a StrongBuy and HCMLY is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CPAC: $5.50 vs. HCMLY: $22.25)
Brand notoriety: CPAC and HCMLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPAC: 5% vs. HCMLY: 46%
Market capitalization -- CPAC: $523.15M vs. HCMLY: $39.08B
CPAC [@Construction Materials] is valued at $523.15M. HCMLY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $39.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHCMLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CPAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HCMLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HCMLY is a better buy in the long-term than CPAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HCMLY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HCMLY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CPAC (@Construction Materials) experienced а +0.55% price change this week, while HCMLY (@Construction Materials) price change was +4.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

HCMLY is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+3.35% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HCMLY($39.1B) has a higher market cap than CPAC($523M). CPAC has higher P/E ratio than HCMLY: CPAC (11.27) vs HCMLY (10.41). HCMLY YTD gains are higher at: 16.188 vs. CPAC (5.163). HCMLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.78B vs. CPAC (476M). HCMLY has more cash in the bank: 3.65B vs. CPAC (186M). HCMLY has higher revenues than CPAC: HCMLY (27.6B) vs CPAC (1.97B).
CPACHCMLYCPAC / HCMLY
Capitalization523M39.1B1%
EBITDA476M7.78B6%
Gain YTD5.16316.18832%
P/E Ratio11.2710.41108%
Revenue1.97B27.6B7%
Total Cash186M3.65B5%
Total Debt6.99MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPAC vs HCMLY: Fundamental Ratings
CPAC
HCMLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
524
SMR RATING
1..100
5799
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5043
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6223
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPAC's Valuation (50) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as HCMLY (50) in the null industry. This means that CPAC’s stock grew similarly to HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPAC (52) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

CPAC's SMR Rating (57) in the Construction Materials industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HCMLY (99) in the null industry. This means that CPAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HCMLY’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CPAC (50) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew similarly to CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

HCMLY's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPAC (62) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that HCMLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HCMLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HCMLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HDVSX12.880.04
+0.31%
Hartford International Equity R4
MXMTX9.15-0.01
-0.11%
Empower Small Cap Growth Investor
HSAFX9.84-0.02
-0.20%
Hussman Strategic Allocation
BBVSX13.10-0.03
-0.23%
Bridge Builder Small/Mid Cap Value
CBBIX6.20-0.02
-0.32%
AB Relative Value I

CPAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CPAC and HCMLY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPAC and HCMLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPAC
1D Price
Change %
CPAC100%
+0.92%
HCMLY - CPAC
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
USLM - CPAC
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
SUM - CPAC
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CX - CPAC
1%
Poorly correlated
+4.04%
JHX - CPAC
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
More

HCMLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HCMLY has been closely correlated with HDLMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HCMLY jumps, then HDLMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HCMLY
1D Price
Change %
HCMLY100%
+1.27%
HDLMY - HCMLY
67%
Closely correlated
+3.76%
CRH - HCMLY
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.19%
SUM - HCMLY
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
EXP - HCMLY
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
VMC - HCMLY
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.99%
More