Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CPCLX vs GTLSX
CPCLX vs GTLSX Comparison
Open Charts CPCLX vs GTLSX
CPCLX vs GTLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CPCLX vs. GTLSX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPCLX is a Hold and GTLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CPCLX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. GTLSX (44.3M). GTLSX pays higher dividends than CPCLX: GTLSX (1.46) vs CPCLX (0.53). CPCLX was incepted earlier than GTLSX: CPCLX (10 years) vs GTLSX (7 years). CPCLX (3.05) is less costly to investors than GTLSX (2.80). CPCLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 347.00 vs. GTLSX (109.00). CPCLX has a lower initial minimum investment than GTLSX: CPCLX (2500) vs GTLSX (500000). GTLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.49 vs. CPCLX (-3.13). GTLSX return over 5 years is better than : 14.10 vs. CPCLX (7.63).
| CPCLX | GTLSX | CPCLX / GTLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 2.34 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.05 | 2.80 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.573 | 3.769 | -15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 500000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 44.3M | 2,451% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 1.46 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.13 | -1.49 | 210% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.54 | 0.32 | 3,286% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.63 | 14.10 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement