LHX | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CPZ | LHX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago52% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago54% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago63% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago51% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 3 days ago48% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 15 days ago57% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago56% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago57% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CPZ and CSX have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CPZ and CSX's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CPZ | 100% | -0.26% | ||
CSX - CPZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.33% | ||
DAL - CPZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -6.43% | ||
LHX - CPZ | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
MSFT - CPZ | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
ORCL - CPZ | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.81% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LHX has been loosely correlated with LMT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LHX jumps, then LMT could also see price increases.