CQP
Price
$70.92
Change
-$0.29 (-0.41%)
Updated
Sep 3, 02:43 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
34.47B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAGP
Price
$27.68
Change
-$0.67 (-2.36%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.61B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CQP vs PAGP

CQP vs PAGP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CQP vs. PAGP commentary
Sep 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a StrongBuy and PAGP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2026
Stock price -- (CQP: $71.22 vs. PAGP: $28.35)
Brand notoriety: CQP: Not notable vs. PAGP: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CQP: 129% vs. PAGP: 85%
Market capitalization -- CQP: $34.47B vs. PAGP: $5.61B
CQP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $34.47B. PAGP’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $5.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $109.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $17.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CQP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePAGP’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CQP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PAGP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CQP is a better buy in the long-term than PAGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CQP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAGP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CQP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PAGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CQP and PAGP are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +3.91% price change this week, while PAGP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +0.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

CQP is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

PAGP is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.88% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQP($34.5B) has a higher market cap than PAGP($5.61B). PAGP has higher P/E ratio than CQP: PAGP (81.00) vs CQP (12.93). PAGP YTD gains are higher at: 56.229 vs. CQP (38.548). CQP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.57B vs. PAGP (2.81B). PAGP has less debt than CQP: PAGP (11.6B) vs CQP (14.2B). PAGP has higher revenues than CQP: PAGP (45.3B) vs CQP (11.5B).
CQPPAGPCQP / PAGP
Capitalization34.5B5.61B615%
EBITDA4.57B2.81B163%
Gain YTD38.54856.22969%
P/E Ratio12.9381.0016%
Revenue11.5B45.3B25%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt14.2B11.6B122%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQP vs PAGP: Fundamental Ratings
CQP
PAGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8381
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
102
SMR RATING
1..100
457
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
475
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAGP's Valuation (11) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (16). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

PAGP's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (10). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's SMR Rating (4) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAGP (57). This means that CQP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAGP’s over the last 12 months.

PAGP's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as CQP (42). This means that PAGP’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

PAGP's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CQP (47). This means that PAGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CQP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CQPPAGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CQP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAGP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBTA37.690.42
+1.13%
Ibotta
SNTI0.34N/A
+0.56%
Senti Biosciences Holdings Inc.
NWE70.190.28
+0.40%
NorthWestern Energy Group
LAWR3.75N/A
N/A
Robot Consulting Co Ltd
TTWO216.14-0.54
-0.25%
Take-Two Interactive Software