Advertisement
CQP vs HESM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a StrongBuy and HESM is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CQP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHESM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CQP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- HESM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CQP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HESM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CQP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HESM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -0.51% price change this week, while HESM (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -1.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
CQP is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
HESM is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (-1.07% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| CQP | HESM | CQP / HESM | |
| Capitalization | 23.9B | 2.87B | 832% |
| EBITDA | 5.75B | 1.02B | 565% |
| Gain YTD | 8.641 | 6.967 | 124% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.11 | 17.28 | 41% |
| Revenue | 9.66B | 1.35B | 718% |
| Total Cash | 575M | 5.4M | 10,648% |
| Total Debt | 16B | 3.21B | 498% |
CQP | HESM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 11 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HESM's Valuation (35) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CQP (82) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that HESM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CQP’s over the last 12 months.
HESM's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as CQP (21) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that HESM’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.
CQP's SMR Rating (11) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as HESM (19) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to HESM’s over the last 12 months.
HESM's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as CQP (60) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that HESM’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.
CQP's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HESM (70) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew somewhat faster than HESM’s over the last 12 months.
| CQP | HESM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 67% | 21 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 56% | 1 day ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JMEE | 60.99 | 0.47 | +0.78% |
| JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enh Eq ETF | |||
| QYLG | 28.01 | 0.16 | +0.57% |
| Global X Nasdaq 100® Covered Call&Gr ETF | |||
| RUNN | 34.36 | 0.19 | +0.56% |
| Running Oak Efficient Growth ETF | |||
| TJAN | 26.41 | 0.06 | +0.23% |
| Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr to January 2027 | |||
| MEDI | 26.69 | N/A | -0.02% |
| Harbor Health Care ETF | |||
CQP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been loosely correlated with MPLX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then MPLX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQP | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| MPLX - CQP | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| GLP - CQP | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| LNG - CQP | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| HESM - CQP | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| EPD - CQP | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
More | ||||
HESM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HESM has been closely correlated with PAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HESM jumps, then PAA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HESM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HESM | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| PAA - HESM | 75% Closely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| PAGP - HESM | 74% Closely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| OKE - HESM | 74% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| EPD - HESM | 74% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| ET - HESM | 74% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||