CQP
Price
$53.98
Change
-$0.08 (-0.15%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
26.13B
54 days until earnings call
HESM
Price
$40.75
Change
-$0.53 (-1.28%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
5.34B
45 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CQP vs HESM

Header iconCQP vs HESM Comparison
Open Charts CQP vs HESMBanner chart's image
Cheniere Energy Partners
Price$53.98
Change-$0.08 (-0.15%)
Volume$88.28K
Capitalization26.13B
Hess Midstream
Price$40.75
Change-$0.53 (-1.28%)
Volume$922.46K
Capitalization5.34B
CQP vs HESM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HESM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CQP vs. HESM commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQP is a StrongBuy and HESM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CQP: $53.98 vs. HESM: $40.75)
Brand notoriety: CQP and HESM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Pipelines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CQP: 73% vs. HESM: 60%
Market capitalization -- CQP: $26.13B vs. HESM: $5.34B
CQP [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] is valued at $26.13B. HESM’s [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] market capitalization is $5.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry ranges from $105.54B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Pipelines] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CQP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHESM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CQP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HESM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CQP and HESM are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CQP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HESM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CQP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HESM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HESM is a better buy in the short-term than CQP.

Price Growth

CQP (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а -2.28% price change this week, while HESM (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was -1.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

CQP is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

HESM is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+1.25% weekly)

Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CQP($26.1B) has a higher market cap than HESM($5.34B). HESM has higher P/E ratio than CQP: HESM (15.15) vs CQP (13.13). HESM YTD gains are higher at: 16.126 vs. CQP (6.049). CQP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.91B vs. HESM (1.19B). CQP has more cash in the bank: 108M vs. HESM (4.5M). HESM has less debt than CQP: HESM (3.71B) vs CQP (14.8B). CQP has higher revenues than HESM: CQP (9.96B) vs HESM (1.57B).
CQPHESMCQP / HESM
Capitalization26.1B5.34B489%
EBITDA3.91B1.19B328%
Gain YTD6.04916.12638%
P/E Ratio13.1315.1587%
Revenue9.96B1.57B636%
Total Cash108M4.5M2,400%
Total Debt14.8B3.71B398%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CQP vs HESM: Fundamental Ratings
CQP
HESM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
49
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
257
SMR RATING
1..100
1019
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6151
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2556
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HESM's Valuation (15) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CQP (54) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that HESM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CQP’s over the last 12 months.

HESM's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as CQP (25) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that HESM’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's SMR Rating (10) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as HESM (19) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to HESM’s over the last 12 months.

HESM's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as CQP (61) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry. This means that HESM’s stock grew similarly to CQP’s over the last 12 months.

CQP's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as HESM (56) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that CQP’s stock grew similarly to HESM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CQPHESM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
44%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CQP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HESM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HTAB18.840.15
+0.80%
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond ETF
BSCT18.900.04
+0.21%
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corp Bd ETF
CPSF24.980.01
+0.04%
Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Feb
ARKA67.44N/A
N/A
Ark 21Shares Active Bitcoin Futs StgyETF
ESGG192.54-0.60
-0.31%
FlexShares STOXX Glbl ESG Select ETF

CQP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQP has been closely correlated with LNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQP jumps, then LNG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CQP
1D Price
Change %
CQP100%
-0.15%
LNG - CQP
67%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
GLP - CQP
66%
Closely correlated
-1.42%
HESM - CQP
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
OKE - CQP
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.35%
MPLX - CQP
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
More