| CQQQ | ECNS | CQQQ / ECNS | |
| Gain YTD | -3.077 | -11.333 | 27% |
| Net Assets | 3.09B | 65.2M | 4,742% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.59 | 110% |
| Turnover | 37.00 | 35.00 | 106% |
| Yield | 1.97 | 6.69 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 16 years | - |
| CQQQ | ECNS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 17 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DECU | 29.18 | N/A | N/A |
| AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncDecETF | |||
| PBAP | 31.01 | -0.06 | -0.18% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Apr | |||
| CFIT | 25.69 | -0.14 | -0.54% |
| Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF | |||
| PEJ | 64.51 | -0.73 | -1.12% |
| Invesco Dynamic Leisure and Entmnt ETF | |||
| BITO | 8.77 | -0.18 | -2.01% |
| ProShares Bitcoin ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CQQQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CQQQ | 100% | -2.04% | ||
| BILI - CQQQ | 79% Closely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| BIDU - CQQQ | 75% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| GDS - CQQQ | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.55% | ||
| TME - CQQQ | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| KC - CQQQ | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECNS has been loosely correlated with DQ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECNS jumps, then DQ could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ECNS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ECNS | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| DQ - ECNS | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| NOAH - ECNS | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.26% | ||
| LU - ECNS | 39% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| EH - ECNS | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.77% | ||
| JKS - ECNS | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.30% | ||
More | ||||