CQQQ
Price
$54.19
Change
-$0.50 (-0.91%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
3.27B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
EWT
Price
$102.81
Change
-$2.10 (-2.00%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Net Assets
10.91B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CQQQ vs EWT

CQQQ vs EWT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) vs. iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT)

Key Takeaways

  • Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) provides targeted exposure to Chinese technology companies through a passive strategy tracking the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index, while iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) offers broad access to Taiwanese equities via the MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index.
  • CQQQ holds approximately 172 securities with a 0.65% expense ratio, emphasizing consumer internet and software firms, whereas EWT maintains about 90 holdings at a lower 0.59% expense ratio with significant concentration in semiconductors and hardware.
  • Both ETFs are fully passive index trackers without leverage or active management, featuring quarterly or periodic rebalancing typical of their underlying benchmarks.
  • Sector exposure differs markedly: CQQQ is narrowly focused on China information technology, while EWT delivers diversified single-country exposure with heavy technology weighting driven by Taiwan's semiconductor leadership.
  • Liquidity profiles favor EWT due to substantially larger assets under management, supporting tighter spreads for institutional and retail investors compared to CQQQ.
  • Structural differences position the funds as complementary rather than direct competitors, allowing investors to select based on preferences for China-specific technology themes versus broader Taiwan market participation.

Introduction

Investors seeking Asia-Pacific technology exposure often evaluate single-country or thematic equity ETFs to capture growth in high-value sectors. Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) both target technology-driven economies in the region yet follow distinct strategies. CQQQ narrows focus to Chinese technology firms, while EWT provides diversified access to Taiwan's equity market, which features outsized semiconductor representation. These vehicles do not compete directly but serve as alternative or complementary tools for investors pursuing similar long-term growth objectives amid evolving supply-chain dynamics and innovation cycles.

Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) Overview

Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the FTSE China Incl A 25% Technology Capped Index before fees and expenses. The fund holds approximately 172 securities, providing exposure primarily to large- and mid-cap Chinese technology companies listed across various share classes, including A-shares. Top holdings typically include Meituan, PDD Holdings, Tencent Holdings, Baidu, and Kuaishou Technology, reflecting emphasis on internet platforms, e-commerce, and software. Sector allocation centers almost entirely on information technology. The expense ratio stands at 0.65%. As a conventional passive ETF, it employs full replication or sampling methods with quarterly index rebalancing. The structure suits investors seeking pure-play exposure to China's technology sector without leverage or active stock selection.

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) Overview

iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to track the MSCI Taiwan 25/50 Index. The fund typically holds around 90 securities, representing large- and mid-capitalization Taiwanese companies with free-float adjustments and diversification constraints. Top holdings are dominated by semiconductor leaders such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), with additional exposure to electronics and financial services. Sector allocation shows heavy concentration in technology, often exceeding 70% of assets. The expense ratio is 0.59%. The ETF uses a replication strategy aligned with the index methodology and undergoes periodic rebalancing to maintain target weights. This structure delivers efficient, low-cost access to Taiwan's equity market for investors focused on the region's manufacturing and technology ecosystem.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both ETFs operate within the broader Asia technology and semiconductor supply-chain environment. Taiwan's dominance in advanced chip manufacturing creates persistent demand drivers tied to global artificial intelligence adoption, data center expansion, and consumer electronics cycles. China's technology sector faces ongoing regulatory oversight, export controls, and domestic innovation policies that influence capital allocation and company fundamentals. Macroeconomic factors including interest rate trajectories, trade tensions, and capital expenditure trends in semiconductors affect both markets. Recent capital flows have favored regions with strong hardware production capabilities, while regulatory developments in data privacy and technology self-sufficiency continue to shape investment landscapes. These elements establish a dynamic backdrop of opportunity alongside geopolitical and policy risks.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, performance differentials have reflected distinct exposures: Taiwan's semiconductor-centric economy has benefited from sustained global demand for advanced chips, supporting relative resilience in EWT during periods of technology spending growth. CQQQ has shown sensitivity to China-specific policy shifts and consumer internet recovery trajectories. Volatility profiles differ, with single-country concentration in EWT potentially amplifying sector-driven moves compared to CQQQ's broader China technology basket. Sector rotation toward hardware and away from certain software segments has influenced relative positioning, while interest rate expectations and supply-chain realignments have contributed to periodic divergences. Investors assess these patterns alongside diversification benefits when allocating between the two strategies.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional opportunities aligned with your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural characteristics, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable positioning to iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF (EWT). The lower expense ratio, larger scale supporting liquidity, and concentrated yet high-momentum exposure to Taiwan’s semiconductor leadership align with prevailing sector trends in advanced manufacturing. While Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) offers distinct thematic access to Chinese technology platforms, the combination of cost efficiency and diversification profile within a high-growth subsector gives EWT a probabilistic edge in the current environment. This assessment rests on structural and momentum factors rather than short-term forecasts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CQQQ vs. EWT commentary
Jun 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CQQQ is a StrongBuy and EWT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EWT has more net assets: 10.9B vs. CQQQ (3.27B). EWT has a higher annual dividend yield than CQQQ: EWT (61.829) vs CQQQ (4.212). CQQQ was incepted earlier than EWT: CQQQ (17 years) vs EWT (26 years). EWT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CQQQ (0.65). CQQQ (37.00) and EWT (36.00) have matching turnover.
CQQQEWTCQQQ / EWT
Gain YTD4.21261.8297%
Net Assets3.27B10.9B30%
Total Expense Ratio0.650.59110%
Turnover37.0036.00103%
Yield2.120.97218%
Fund Existence17 years26 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CQQQEWT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CQQQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
EWT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DIPS40.660.26
+0.64%
YieldMax Short NVDA Option Inc Strgy ETF
BFOC16.920.05
+0.29%
FT Vest Bitcoin Strat Floor15 ETF - Oct
SPXX17.87-0.09
-0.50%
Nuveen S&P 500 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
TSLS57.12-0.56
-0.97%
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X Shares
URTY84.87-1.18
-1.37%
ProShares UltraPro Russell2000

CQQQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CQQQ has been closely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CQQQ jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CQQQ
1D Price
Change %
CQQQ100%
-0.91%
BILI - CQQQ
79%
Closely correlated
+1.86%
BIDU - CQQQ
75%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
GDS - CQQQ
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
TME - CQQQ
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.82%
KC - CQQQ
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.55%
More