Advertisement
CR vs GHM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Crane Company (CR) vs. Graham Corporation (GHM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CR and GHM operate in the specialty industrial machinery sector but differ in scale, with CR holding a significantly larger market capitalization.
- Recent market activity shows GHM delivering substantially higher year-to-date and one-year returns compared to CR, which has trailed broader market benchmarks in those periods.
- CR benefits from diversified exposure across aerospace, electronics, and process flow technologies, while GHM focuses on fluid, heat transfer, and vacuum systems with notable defense and space applications.
- Valuation metrics indicate GHM trades at a premium trailing price-to-earnings ratio relative to CR, reflecting differing growth trajectories and market sentiment.
- Sector exposure for both centers on industrials, yet GHM exhibits stronger recent momentum tied to its end markets, contrasting with CR's more measured performance.
- Risk factors include macroeconomic sensitivity for both, with GHM carrying higher volatility consistent with its smaller size and rapid appreciation.
Introduction
This comparison examines CR (Crane Company) and GHM (Graham Corporation), two publicly traded companies in the specialty industrial machinery industry. Both firms manufacture engineered products serving aerospace, defense, energy, and process industries, making the analysis relevant for investors seeking exposure to industrial growth themes. Traders monitoring relative performance, momentum shifts, and sector positioning may find the side-by-side evaluation useful for portfolio allocation decisions. The review draws on recent market data and company fundamentals to highlight key contrasts without favoring either security.
CR Overview and Recent Performance
Crane Company designs and produces engineered industrial products through segments including Aerospace & Electronics and Process Flow Technologies. Its offerings encompass aerospace components, valves, pumps, and related systems for commercial, military, and industrial applications. In recent weeks, the stock has shown relative stability amid broader market fluctuations, with year-to-date returns lagging the S&P 500. Market sentiment has been influenced by steady demand in aerospace and process industries, alongside analyst commentary on earnings consistency. The company maintains a larger market capitalization and more established dividend profile compared to smaller peers, supporting a measured performance trajectory during the recent period.
GHM Overview and Recent Performance
Graham Corporation specializes in fluid, power, heat transfer, and vacuum technologies for chemical processing, defense, space, and energy sectors. Products include ejectors, condensers, turbines, and thermal management systems. Recent market activity has featured pronounced upward momentum, with the stock significantly outperforming major indices on a year-to-date and trailing twelve-month basis. Investor interest has been supported by strong revenue growth and positioning in high-demand end markets such as defense and space. The smaller market capitalization and elevated valuation multiples reflect heightened expectations tied to these catalysts, contributing to volatility observed in recent weeks.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing automated trading systems from its extensive library of hundreds of AI trading bots. These bots execute strategies across thousands of tickers and incorporate varied trading styles, timeframes, risk parameters, and performance statistics. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions and robust historical metrics earn placement in the trending section. Available bots span a wide range of win rates, profit factors, and drawdown profiles, enabling users to explore options suited to different objectives. For further details on current trending selections, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Business models diverge notably: CR offers broader diversification across aerospace electronics and fluid handling, whereas GHM concentrates on specialized thermal and vacuum solutions with heavier defense and space weighting. Growth drivers for GHM center on rapid expansion in high-growth niches, driving superior recent momentum, while CR emphasizes operational stability and consistent cash generation. Risk factors include GHM’s higher valuation sensitivity and smaller scale versus CR’s more moderate leverage and established market presence. Sector exposure remains industrials for both, yet sentiment favors GHM’s catalysts amid current defense spending trends, creating a trade-off between established scale and dynamic growth potential.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, relative momentum, and positioning within end markets, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to GHM over CR. This assessment reflects GHM’s stronger recent performance alignment with sector tailwinds, though outcomes remain subject to evolving fundamentals and market conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CR is a Hold and GHM is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGHM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GHM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GHM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- GHM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CR (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +4.14% price change this week, while GHM (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +0.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.98%.
Reported Earning Dates
CR is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
GHM is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Machinery (+2.00% weekly)The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
| CR | GHM | CR / GHM | |
| Capitalization | 12.4B | 1.26B | 983% |
| EBITDA | 508M | 24.6M | 2,065% |
| Gain YTD | 16.956 | 68.006 | 25% |
| P/E Ratio | 39.40 | 96.35 | 41% |
| Revenue | 2.44B | 238M | 1,027% |
| Total Cash | 355M | 22.3M | 1,592% |
| Total Debt | 1.22B | 6.05M | 20,069% |
CR | GHM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 6 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CR's Valuation (80) in the null industry is in the same range as GHM (82) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CR’s stock grew similarly to GHM’s over the last 12 months.
GHM's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as CR (11) in the null industry. This means that GHM’s stock grew similarly to CR’s over the last 12 months.
CR's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as GHM (65) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CR’s stock grew similarly to GHM’s over the last 12 months.
GHM's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as CR (41) in the null industry. This means that GHM’s stock grew similarly to CR’s over the last 12 months.
GHM's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CR (47) in the null industry. This means that GHM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CR’s over the last 12 months.
| CR | GHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 8 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EACPX | 59.55 | N/A | N/A |
| Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Gr A | |||
| RMLPX | 31.00 | N/A | N/A |
| Recurrent MLP & Infrastructure Class I | |||
| JSJCX | 16.85 | N/A | N/A |
| JHancock Small Cap Dynamic Growth C | |||
| JSVAX | 33.22 | -0.05 | -0.15% |
| Janus Henderson Contrarian T | |||
| CLBCX | 40.76 | -0.14 | -0.34% |
| American Funds American Balanced 529C | |||
CR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CR has been loosely correlated with ZWS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CR jumps, then ZWS could also see price increases.
GHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHM has been loosely correlated with RBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHM jumps, then RBC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GHM | 100% | -2.55% | ||
| RBC - GHM | 53% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| ETN - GHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.32% | ||
| CR - GHM | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| ATMU - GHM | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.64% | ||
| LECO - GHM | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
More | ||||