Advertisement
CRDL vs LNTH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRDL is a Hold and LNTH is a Buy.
| CRDL | LNTH | CRDL / LNTH | |
| Capitalization | 233M | 6.55B | 4% |
| EBITDA | -35.77M | 471M | -8% |
| Gain YTD | 109.163 | 50.639 | 216% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 23.98 | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 1.56B | - |
| Total Cash | 26.1M | 593M | 4% |
| Total Debt | 107K | 625M | 0% |
CRDL | LNTH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 47 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 10 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LNTH's Valuation (52) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRDL (86) in the null industry. This means that LNTH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRDL’s over the last 12 months.
LNTH's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRDL (100) in the null industry. This means that LNTH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRDL’s over the last 12 months.
LNTH's SMR Rating (44) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRDL (100) in the null industry. This means that LNTH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRDL’s over the last 12 months.
CRDL's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as LNTH (40) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that CRDL’s stock grew similarly to LNTH’s over the last 12 months.
LNTH's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRDL (100) in the null industry. This means that LNTH’s stock grew significantly faster than CRDL’s over the last 12 months.
| CRDL | LNTH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 13 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 76% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRDL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while LNTH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CRDL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LNTH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRDL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNTH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRDL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- LNTH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CRDL (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а -9.32% price change this week, while LNTH (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was -0.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was -5.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.17%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRDL is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
LNTH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (-5.31% weekly)A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CSMIX | 47.99 | 0.30 | +0.63% |
| Columbia Small Cap Value Discv A | |||
| BIAGX | 9.79 | N/A | N/A |
| Brown Advisory Growth Equity Inv | |||
| VKSRX | 17.65 | N/A | N/A |
| Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Core R6 | |||
| FFIMX | 23.43 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% I | |||
| LYFAX | 18.53 | N/A | N/A |
| AlphaCentric Life Sciences & Hlthcare A | |||
CRDL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CRDL and SNOA have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRDL and SNOA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRDL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRDL | 100% | +0.76% | ||
| SNOA - CRDL | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
| ACB - CRDL | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
| CRON - CRDL | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
| LNTH - CRDL | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
| SCYX - CRDL | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.98% | ||
More | ||||
LNTH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that LNTH and ACET have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LNTH and ACET's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LNTH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNTH | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| ACET - LNTH | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| VTRS - LNTH | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.79% | ||
| CRDL - LNTH | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.76% | ||
| SNDL - LNTH | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LFCR - LNTH | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||