CRGY
Price
$9.14
Change
-$0.20 (-2.14%)
Updated
Jul 6 closing price
Capitalization
3.02B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FANG
Price
$173.73
Change
+$1.69 (+0.98%)
Updated
Jul 6 closing price
Capitalization
48.87B
27 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRGY vs FANG

CRGY vs FANG Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) vs. Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CRGY has shown stronger year-to-date (YTD) performance with a gain of approximately 60%, outpacing FANG's 37% rise, amid favorable oil market dynamics.
  • FANG commands a much larger market capitalization of over $57 billion compared to CRGY's roughly $4.5 billion, reflecting greater scale in the oil and gas exploration and production (E&P) sector.
  • Both stocks offer dividends, with CRGY yielding around 3.6% and FANG at 2%, providing income in a volatile energy market.
  • CRGY trades at a lower forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of about 8.3x versus FANG's 10.7x, suggesting relative value.
  • FANG displays lower volatility with a beta of 0.49, compared to CRGY's 1.05, appealing to risk-averse investors.
  • Analyst price targets indicate potential upside for both, with averages around $17 for CRGY and $223 for FANG.

Introduction

Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) are key players in the U.S. oil and gas exploration and production (E&P) sector, focusing on high-yield basins amid fluctuating energy prices and geopolitical tensions. This comparison analyzes their recent market performance, financial metrics, and positioning, helping traders and investors gauge relative strengths in the current environment. Energy sector enthusiasts, value seekers, and momentum traders will find insights into how these stocks stack up, particularly as oil sentiment shifts influence stock trajectories.

CRGY Overview and Recent Performance

Crescent Energy Company (CRGY), based in Houston, Texas, engages in the acquisition, exploration, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids primarily in the Eagle Ford, Permian, and Uinta Basins. It also holds minerals and royalty interests across U.S. basins. In recent market activity, CRGY stock has exhibited robust momentum, rallying significantly over the past year with YTD gains near 60%. This performance has been supported by anticipation of strong quarterly earnings and positive sector tailwinds from elevated oil prices. Shares have traded near their 52-week highs around $14, reflecting improved sentiment despite some intraday volatility. Key influences include operational updates and broader energy demand recovery, though higher debt levels temper enthusiasm.

FANG Overview and Recent Performance

Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG), headquartered in Midland, Texas, is an independent E&P firm concentrated on the Permian Basin's Spraberry, Wolfcamp, and Bone Spring formations in West Texas and New Mexico. Recent weeks have seen FANG maintain steady upward traction, with YTD returns of about 37% and shares approaching 52-week highs near $207. Performance has been buoyed by upward oil price forecasts, strategic deal announcements like the Endeavor acquisition, and solid profitability metrics. Trading volume remains active, and lower beta underscores resilience amid market dips. Sentiment benefits from Permian efficiency and scale advantages, positioning it well for ongoing energy transitions.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available on the platform, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies and timeframes like 5-minute scalps to multi-day holds. These bots employ AI-driven signals with risk controls such as take-profit/stop-loss corridors, displaying metrics including win rates from 51% to 75%, profit factors up to 3.33, Sharpe ratios exceeding 12, and returns as high as 164% in recent periods, with max drawdowns ranging $8,000–$48,000. Strategies span trend-following, multi-agent systems, and sector-specific plays in semiconductors, AI infrastructure, small caps, and more—none currently feature CRGY or FANG. Traders can explore these high-conviction bots tailored to prevailing market conditions for potential edge.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both CRGY and FANG operate in oil and gas E&P but differ in scope: CRGY pursues multi-basin diversification including royalties, while FANG emphasizes Permian pure-play efficiency. Growth drivers for CRGY include acquisitions and earnings beats, contrasting FANG's focus on operational leverage and M&A (mergers and acquisitions). Recent momentum favors CRGY with superior YTD gains, but FANG offers better profit margins (11.6% vs. 3.7%) and lower debt-to-equity (34% vs. 107%). Risk profiles diverge, with CRGY's higher beta signaling greater sensitivity to oil swings. Market sentiment leans positive for both amid energy demand, though FANG's scale provides a stability edge.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward CRGY with higher probability in the near term, driven by consistent momentum, attractive forward valuation, and basin exposure aligning with recent oil strength. FANG remains compelling for stability seekers given its scale and lower risk, but CRGY's relative outperformance positions it favorably amid evolving sector trends.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
CRGY vs. FANG commentary
Jul 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRGY is a Buy and FANG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2026
Stock price -- (CRGY: $9.14 vs. FANG: $172.04)
Brand notoriety: CRGY: Not notable vs. FANG: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRGY: 74% vs. FANG: 63%
Market capitalization -- CRGY: $3.02B vs. FANG: $48.87B
CRGY [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $3.02B. FANG’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $48.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $126.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRGY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFANG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRGY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FANG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CRGY and FANG are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRGY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FANG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRGY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FANG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRGY is a better buy in the short-term than FANG.

Price Growth

CRGY (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -8.60% price change this week, while FANG (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -4.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRGY is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.

FANG is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-2.22% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FANG($48.9B) has a higher market cap than CRGY($3.02B). FANG has higher P/E ratio than CRGY: FANG (191.63) vs CRGY (25.39). FANG YTD gains are higher at: 15.759 vs. CRGY (11.078). FANG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.68B vs. CRGY (1.26B). FANG has more cash in the bank: 174M vs. CRGY (9.78M). CRGY has less debt than FANG: CRGY (5.37B) vs FANG (13.9B). FANG has higher revenues than CRGY: FANG (15.1B) vs CRGY (3.81B).
CRGYFANGCRGY / FANG
Capitalization3.02B48.9B6%
EBITDA1.26B5.68B22%
Gain YTD11.07815.75970%
P/E Ratio25.39191.6313%
Revenue3.81B15.1B25%
Total Cash9.78M174M6%
Total Debt5.37B13.9B39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FANG: Fundamental Ratings
FANG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
64
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
41
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRGYFANG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRGY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FANG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TEL200.152.71
+1.37%
TE CONNECTIVITY Ltd
SIFY15.32N/A
N/A
Sify Technologies Ltd
MARA12.40N/A
N/A
MARA Holdings Inc
ALEC2.06N/A
N/A
Alector
BCDA1.20N/A
N/A
BioCardia Inc.

CRGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRGY has been closely correlated with CHRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRGY jumps, then CHRD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRGY
1D Price
Change %
CRGY100%
-2.14%
CHRD - CRGY
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
MGY - CRGY
80%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
OVV - CRGY
79%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
PR - CRGY
79%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
NOG - CRGY
78%
Closely correlated
-3.23%
More

FANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FANG has been closely correlated with CHRD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FANG jumps, then CHRD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FANG
1D Price
Change %
FANG100%
N/A
CHRD - FANG
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
OVV - FANG
81%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
MGY - FANG
80%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
CRGY - FANG
76%
Closely correlated
-2.14%
NOG - FANG
76%
Closely correlated
-3.23%
More