Traders and investors often compare CRM and FFIV to evaluate opportunities across enterprise software and infrastructure technology. Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) provides cloud-based customer relationship management (CRM) platforms, while F5, Inc. (FFIV) delivers application security and delivery solutions for multicloud environments. This comparison appeals to those seeking insights into relative performance, business model contrasts, and market positioning within the technology sector amid evolving AI and cloud adoption trends.
Salesforce, Inc. (CRM) is a leading provider of customer relationship management software and related enterprise applications, serving a wide range of industries through its cloud platform. In recent weeks, the stock has experienced pressure, closing at $163.66 on July 24, 2026, after a 4.29% gain that day but remaining down substantially on a year-to-date basis. Recent market activity has been influenced by analyst downgrades, mixed feedback on AI initiatives such as Agentforce, and broader sector rotation. A notable positive development includes a $1.6 billion contract with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to enhance services through artificial intelligence, which has drawn attention to the company’s strategic growth areas despite ongoing debates on valuation and growth outlook.
F5, Inc. (FFIV) specializes in multicloud application security and delivery solutions, helping organizations secure and manage applications across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments. The stock has demonstrated relative strength in recent market activity, closing at $392.21 on July 24, 2026, up 1.06% for the session and posting robust year-to-date gains exceeding 50%. Performance has been supported by demand for AI-related infrastructure and hybrid multicloud capabilities, though the company faces an upcoming quarterly earnings report and a noted cybersecurity incident. Partnerships with major cloud providers and new product advancements in AI cyber resilience have contributed to positive sentiment in recent weeks.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only the strongest performers with suitable strategies for current environments are featured in this section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with statistics often including win rates, drawdowns, and return profiles that vary significantly across offerings. This resource provides traders with data-driven options tailored to diverse market scenarios. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.
CRM and FFIV differ substantially in business models: CRM centers on subscription-based customer relationship management (CRM) and productivity tools with heavy emphasis on artificial intelligence monetization, while FFIV focuses on infrastructure software for application delivery, security, and networking in multicloud settings. Growth drivers for CRM include large enterprise contracts and AI product adoption, whereas FFIV benefits from cybersecurity demand and cloud provider partnerships. Recent momentum has favored FFIV, with stronger price appreciation compared to CRM’s declines amid analyst scrutiny. Risk factors for CRM involve competition in the AI and software-as-a-service space and guidance shortfalls, while FFIV contends with potential earnings variability and security incidents. Sector exposure places CRM firmly in application software and FFIV in infrastructure and security, leading to divergent market sentiment influenced by distinct catalysts and competitive landscapes.
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, relative price stability, upcoming catalysts like earnings, and positioning within current market conditions, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to FFIV over CRM. This assessment reflects FFIV’s stronger recent performance metrics and infrastructure demand tailwinds, though outcomes remain subject to broader economic variables and company-specific developments.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFFIV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRM’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFIV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +15.15% price change this week, while FFIV (@Computer Communications) price change was +0.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.83%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.93%.
CRM is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
FFIV is expected to report earnings on Nov 02, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Computer Communications (+1.79% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| CRM | FFIV | CRM / FFIV | |
| Capitalization | 148B | 22.1B | 670% |
| EBITDA | 13.7B | 905M | 1,514% |
| Gain YTD | -31.437 | 52.296 | -60% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.94 | 30.97 | 68% |
| Revenue | 42.8B | 3.23B | 1,327% |
| Total Cash | 11.8B | 1.44B | 818% |
| Total Debt | 41.9B | 260M | 16,115% |
CRM | FFIV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 21 | 85 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 56 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 45 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRM's Valuation (15) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFIV (56) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFIV’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRM (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew significantly faster than CRM’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's SMR Rating (45) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CRM (52) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew similarly to CRM’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CRM (48) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew similarly to CRM’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRM (95) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRM’s over the last 12 months.
| CRM | FFIV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 37% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 43% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 70% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFIV has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFIV jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFIV | 100% | +0.47% | ||
| SHOP - FFIV | 58% Loosely correlated | -5.24% | ||
| ADSK - FFIV | 56% Loosely correlated | -4.19% | ||
| CDNS - FFIV | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
| CVLT - FFIV | 54% Loosely correlated | -3.23% | ||
| CRM - FFIV | 53% Loosely correlated | -4.07% | ||
More | ||||