Enterprise software remains one of the most closely watched segments of the technology sector, and two names that frequently appear side by side in investor discussions are CRM (Salesforce, Inc.) and TEAM (Atlassian Corporation). Both companies sell mission-critical software to organizations worldwide, and both are racing to integrate artificial intelligence across their product portfolios. Yet they differ markedly in scale, maturity, profitability, and growth trajectory. This stock comparison examines how these two cloud-native platforms are positioned in the current market environment — ideal reading for traders and investors weighing a mature, cash-rich industry leader against a faster-growing but less profitable challenger.
Salesforce is the world's largest cloud-based customer relationship management (CRM) platform, with annual revenue surpassing $41 billion in its most recent fiscal year. The company's product ecosystem spans sales, service, marketing, analytics, integration, and collaboration — anchored by its Customer 360 platform and amplified by acquisitions including Slack, Tableau, MuleSoft, and Informatica. In recent quarters, Salesforce has positioned Agentforce — its suite of autonomous AI agents — as the centerpiece of its growth strategy. The company reported that Agentforce and Data 360 annual recurring revenue (ARR) reached nearly $1.4 billion, up 114% year-over-year, with over 9,500 paid Agentforce deals closed since launch.
Despite these AI-driven milestones, CRM shares have experienced considerable pressure in recent market activity. The stock has traded substantially below its 52-week high, reflecting investor concerns about decelerating revenue growth in the company's core subscription business, where growth has settled into the high single digits. Salesforce's strong GAAP profitability — with non-GAAP operating margins above 34% — and its massive capital return program, including a $50 billion share repurchase authorization, provide a stabilizing counterbalance. The forward valuation has contracted meaningfully, with the stock's forward P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) dipping into the low teens, a level that has historically attracted value-conscious investors.
Atlassian is a leading provider of team collaboration and productivity software, best known for products such as Jira, Confluence, Trello, and Bitbucket. The company serves over 300,000 customers globally, with approximately 80% of the Fortune 500 using its tools. Atlassian's fiscal year 2025 revenue exceeded $5.2 billion, representing approximately 20% growth year-over-year. Cloud revenue has been a particular bright spot, growing 26% in recent quarters and crossing the $1 billion quarterly threshold for the first time, driven by accelerating migrations from on-premise Data Center deployments and robust seat expansion.
On the AI front, Atlassian's Rovo platform has gained meaningful traction, surpassing 5 million monthly active users. The company's AI capabilities have been cited by management as a primary catalyst for enterprise upgrades to the Teamwork Collection, which sold over one million seats in under nine months. However, TEAM shares have also endured a challenging period in recent market activity, with significant retracement from their 52-week highs. While Atlassian's non-GAAP operating margin of approximately 24% reflects improving operational discipline, the company remains GAAP unprofitable — an important distinction for risk-conscious investors. Revenue growth guidance in the 18-20% range for the current fiscal year underscores sustained demand, though the pace represents a measured deceleration from prior years.
For investors seeking a data-driven approach to navigating stocks like CRM and TEAM, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed for current market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and forex — each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance track record, and risk profile. However, only the most effective and market-appropriate bots earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots are evaluated based on statistical performance metrics, including win rates, profit factors, and trade frequency, helping users quickly identify strategies that have demonstrated consistency. Whether traders favor short-term momentum plays or longer-duration swing strategies, the Trending AI Robots page provides a streamlined entry point into algorithmic trading tailored to real-time market dynamics.
When comparing CRM and TEAM side by side, several structural contrasts stand out. Salesforce operates at roughly eight times the annual revenue scale of Atlassian and generates substantial GAAP net income — a function of its mature subscription base and disciplined cost management. Atlassian, by contrast, is reinvesting aggressively in cloud infrastructure, AI development, and enterprise sales capacity, which keeps GAAP earnings negative but supports a higher organic growth rate.
In terms of business model, Salesforce derives roughly 94% of its revenue from subscription and support contracts with large enterprises, providing high visibility into future cash flows. Atlassian follows a similar recurring revenue model but relies more heavily on a land-and-expand approach, where free or low-cost product adoption within teams gradually converts into paid enterprise-wide deployments. This strategy has produced a cloud net revenue retention rate of 120%, signaling strong expansion within existing accounts.
On the risk side, Salesforce faces the challenge of market saturation in its core CRM categories, with growth in Sales Cloud and Service Cloud moderating. Atlassian must contend with the uncertainty of sustained enterprise IT spending, particularly as AI tools raise questions about the future of knowledge-worker headcount, which directly influences seat-based pricing models. Both companies face competitive pressure from AI-native entrants seeking to disrupt traditional SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) incumbents.
Sector exposure offers another point of differentiation. Salesforce serves a broad cross-section of industries — including financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, and government — while Atlassian's core strength lies within technology and engineering teams, though it is increasingly expanding into non-technical departments such as HR, finance, and operations.
Based on observable trend consistency, financial stability, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward CRM in the current environment. The reasoning centers on Salesforce's combination of compressed valuation multiples, robust free cash flow generation exceeding $13 billion annually, and the early but tangible monetization of its Agentforce AI platform. While Atlassian's (TEAM) higher revenue growth rate is compelling, the absence of GAAP profitability and the stock's elevated valuation relative to current earnings introduce greater statistical uncertainty in AI-driven trend analysis. An AI model evaluating probabilistic outcomes would likely recognize Salesforce's margin of safety — underpinned by dividends, aggressive buybacks, and operational maturity — as offering a more favorable risk-reward profile, though Atlassian's long-term growth narrative remains a credible counterargument should AI adoption accelerate faster than consensus expectations.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTEAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEAM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.12% price change this week, while TEAM (@Packaged Software) price change was -13.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.02%.
CRM is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
TEAM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRM | TEAM | CRM / TEAM | |
| Capitalization | 129B | 20.3B | 635% |
| EBITDA | 13.7B | -21.17M | -64,711% |
| Gain YTD | -40.460 | -50.567 | 80% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.18 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 42.8B | 6.19B | 691% |
| Total Cash | 11.8B | 1.14B | 1,039% |
| Total Debt | 41.9B | 1.24B | 3,371% |
CRM | TEAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRM's Valuation (14) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for TEAM (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew significantly faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TEAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's SMR Rating (52) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEAM (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CRM (61) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to CRM’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRM (95) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew significantly faster than CRM’s over the last 12 months.
| CRM | TEAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 70% | 5 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 79% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | 100% | -3.72% | ||
| NOW - CRM | 78% Closely correlated | -3.69% | ||
| HUBS - CRM | 77% Closely correlated | -7.27% | ||
| WDAY - CRM | 75% Closely correlated | -3.44% | ||
| TEAM - CRM | 72% Closely correlated | -6.15% | ||
| FRSH - CRM | 71% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEAM has been closely correlated with WDAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEAM jumps, then WDAY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TEAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | 100% | -6.15% | ||
| WDAY - TEAM | 74% Closely correlated | -3.44% | ||
| HUBS - TEAM | 73% Closely correlated | -7.27% | ||
| ASAN - TEAM | 71% Closely correlated | -4.51% | ||
| FRSH - TEAM | 70% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| PCTY - TEAM | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||