Advertisement
CRM vs TEAM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Salesforce (CRM) vs. Atlassian (TEAM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Salesforce (CRM) is the dominant leader in customer relationship management software, with more than 20% market share, but growth has moderated to roughly 10–12% annually.
- Atlassian (TEAM) is growing much faster, with revenue up about 32% year over year in its most recent quarter, but it remains unprofitable on a GAAP basis.
- CRM trades at a lower forward earnings multiple and generates strong cash flow, while TEAM carries a richer valuation tied to faster expansion.
- Both companies are pivoting toward AI agents, with Salesforce pushing Agentforce and Atlassian advancing its Rovo platform.
- Relative momentum favors TEAM over the past year, while CRM has staged a strong recent rebound despite a heavy acquisition strategy.
Introduction
Investors weighing enterprise software opportunities often encounter two very different profiles in Salesforce and Atlassian. Salesforce is a mature, cash-rich giant that dominates customer relationship management (CRM) software, while Atlassian is a faster-growing specialist in collaboration and developer tools built around products such as Jira and Confluence. Comparing these names helps illustrate the trade-off between stability and valuation on one side, and growth and momentum on the other. This stock comparison is especially relevant for growth investors, software-sector specialists, and anyone evaluating how artificial intelligence is reshaping the competitive landscape for cloud-based business applications.
CRM Overview and Recent Performance
CRM, the ticker for Salesforce, Inc., remains the clear market leader in customer relationship management software with more than 20% share of the category. The company has broadened beyond sales tools into analytics, collaboration, and data management through a series of acquisitions. In recent weeks, Salesforce has leaned heavily on its AI strategy, anchored by Agentforce, an enterprise platform for building autonomous AI agents. The company reported that Agentforce annual recurring revenue (ARR) surpassed $1.5 billion, up more than 240% year over year, while combined Agentforce and Data 360 ARR approached $3.9 billion.
Salesforce's recent market activity has been shaped by an aggressive acquisition push. The company announced an all-cash deal to acquire customer engagement platform Braze for roughly $5.66 billion, a move intended to strengthen its Marketing Cloud and AI personalization capabilities. The stock slipped on the news, reflecting investor scrutiny of deal-related spending and execution risk, even as the company reaffirmed its fiscal-year outlook. Broader sentiment has been mixed: the stock has lost value over a multi-year horizon despite a notable rebound in recent weeks, and it now trades below the average multiple of the software sector.
TEAM Overview and Recent Performance
TEAM, the ticker for Atlassian Corporation, provides collaboration and work-management software, most notably Jira for project tracking and Confluence for documentation. The company has carved out a strong position in the software development ecosystem, serving more than 300,000 customers. Its recent performance has been driven by accelerating cloud migration, expanding enterprise accounts, and early monetization of its Rovo AI platform, which management says is helping customers grow recurring revenue at roughly twice the rate of non-users.
Atlassian's recent market activity has been notably strong. In its most recent quarterly report, revenue rose about 32% year over year, exceeding analyst expectations, and the company raised its full-year revenue growth outlook to approximately 24%. The stock jumped sharply on the results and has gained substantially over the past year. Despite this momentum, Atlassian remains unprofitable on a generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) basis, weighed down by restructuring charges and continued investment, and its free cash flow declined year over year. The company also continues to experiment with usage-based pricing, which analysts view as a potential catalyst for higher average revenue per customer.
Trending AI Robots
For investors who prefer a data-driven, automated approach to navigating names like these, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of its AI trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those best suited to current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. Each bot operates with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance history, and universe of tickers, giving users a diverse range of approaches to review. The curated list is designed to highlight the bots currently showing the most relevant and timely alignment with market trends, helping traders quickly identify opportunities without sifting through the full catalog. Explore the Trending AI Robots section to see which strategies are currently standing out.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The core contrast between these two companies is maturity versus growth. Salesforce is a scaled, highly profitable enterprise with substantial free cash flow, a newly authorized $50 billion share buyback, and a valuation that sits below the software-industry average. Its challenge is sustaining meaningful expansion from a much larger revenue base, currently around $44 billion annually, while navigating an AI-driven shift from seat-based to consumption-based pricing. Atlassian, by comparison, is a smaller company with roughly $6.6 billion in trailing revenue, growing much faster and enjoying strong momentum from cloud migration and AI adoption.
Risk profiles also diverge. Salesforce faces execution risk from its stepped-up merger and acquisition (M&A) activity and competitive pressure from larger technology platforms, while Atlassian's GAAP losses, compressed free cash flow, and richer valuation introduce their own sensitivity to any slowdown. Sector exposure is similar — both are enterprise software names tied to the AI theme — but their business models differ: Salesforce monetizes a broad, sticky CRM and data platform, whereas Atlassian monetizes collaboration and developer workflows with a heavier reliance on seat expansion and pricing changes.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, growth momentum, catalysts, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely express a nuanced preference. Atlassian currently demonstrates stronger revenue momentum and more consistent upward price trend over the trailing year, supported by clear catalysts in cloud migration and AI-driven upsell. However, Salesforce offers more stable cash generation, a lower relative valuation, and a reaccelerating growth narrative through Agentforce. A probabilistic assessment would likely lean toward Atlassian for trend-following and momentum strategies, while favoring Salesforce for investors emphasizing valuation support and cash-flow stability. The most suitable choice therefore depends on the trading timeframe and risk posture being evaluated.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRM is a Buy and TEAM is a StrongBuy.
CRM sees its 50-day moving average cross bullishly above its 200-day moving average
The 50-day moving average for CRM moved above the 200-day moving average on September 15, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 12, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CRM as a result. In 54 of 83 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CRM just turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where CRM's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 33 of 47 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
Following a +3.88% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CRM advanced for three days, in 222 of 324 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 42 of 61 cases where CRM's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 69%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CRM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 67%.
CRM broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for CRM entered a downward trend on October 19, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 15 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. CRM’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 71 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (5.199) is normal, around the industry mean (-1.287). P/E Ratio (22.162) is within average values for comparable stocks, (14.534). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.759) is also within normal values, averaging (2.824). Dividend Yield (0.007) settles around the average of (0.074) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (5.107) is also within normal values, averaging (71.128).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 84 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CRM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock worse than average.
Momentum Indicator for TEAM turns positive, indicating new upward trend
TEAM saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 05, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 72 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 58 of the 72 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 81%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for TEAM just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where TEAM's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 32 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
Following a +0.60% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where TEAM advanced for three days, in 232 of 307 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 136 of 169 cases where TEAM Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 80%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The 10-day RSI Indicator for TEAM moved out of overbought territory on October 16, 2026. This could be a bearish sign for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 28 similar instances where the indicator moved out of overbought territory. In 21 of the 28 cases, the stock moved lower in the following days. This puts the odds of a move lower at 75%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 10 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where TEAM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 78%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 3 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (52.881) is normal, around the industry mean (-0.805). TEAM's P/E Ratio (-1052.905) is considerably lower than the industry average of (14.495). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.860) is also within normal values, averaging (2.824). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.074) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (7.530) is also within normal values, averaging (71.128).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 50 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. TEAM’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 92 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. TEAM’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 94, placing this stock worse than average.
CRM | TEAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 71 Overvalued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TEAM's Valuation (3) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRM (71) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew significantly faster than CRM’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CRM (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to CRM’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's SMR Rating (48) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEAM (92) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's Price Growth Rating (15) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEAM (50) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TEAM (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
| CRM | TEAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 67% | 22 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while TEAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TEAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TEAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.86% price change this week, while TEAM (@Packaged Software) price change was +6.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.84%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRM is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2026.
TEAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-0.97% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
Advertisement
TEAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEAM has been closely correlated with ASAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEAM jumps, then ASAN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TEAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | 100% | +2.96% | ||
| ASAN - TEAM | 75% Closely correlated | +5.81% | ||
| NOW - TEAM | 73% Closely correlated | +2.88% | ||
| SPT - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | +7.55% | ||
| WDAY - TEAM | 71% Closely correlated | +4.50% | ||
| CRM - TEAM | 69% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
More | ||||