CRM
Price
$163.61
Change
+$6.68 (+4.26%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
128.53B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TEAM
Price
$86.73
Change
+$6.58 (+8.21%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
20.34B
6 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRM vs TEAM

CRM vs TEAM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Salesforce (CRM) vs. Atlassian (TEAM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Salesforce (CRM) is a mature cloud software giant with over $41 billion in annual revenue, strong GAAP profitability, and aggressive expansion into AI through its Agentforce platform — yet its stock has faced substantial multiple compression amid slowing core growth.
  • Atlassian (TEAM) is a high-growth collaboration software leader delivering revenue expansion above 20% annually, driven by cloud migration and AI adoption, though it continues to operate at a GAAP net loss.
  • Salesforce offers value-oriented metrics including a trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio near 20x and a forward P/E in the low teens, reflecting its transition from growth to a more mature, cash-generative profile.
  • Atlassian commands a premium revenue multiple supported by faster top-line momentum and a large addressable market, but its path to sustained GAAP profitability remains a key point of debate among investors.
  • Both companies are investing heavily in AI — Salesforce through Agentforce and Data 360, Atlassian through Rovo and its Teamwork Graph — making the AI monetization narrative a central driver of sentiment for each.
  • Relative performance diverges sharply: Salesforce provides stability, dividends, and aggressive buybacks, while Atlassian offers higher growth potential alongside greater near-term earnings volatility.

Introduction

Enterprise software remains one of the most closely watched segments of the technology sector, and two names that frequently appear side by side in investor discussions are CRM (Salesforce, Inc.) and TEAM (Atlassian Corporation). Both companies sell mission-critical software to organizations worldwide, and both are racing to integrate artificial intelligence across their product portfolios. Yet they differ markedly in scale, maturity, profitability, and growth trajectory. This stock comparison examines how these two cloud-native platforms are positioned in the current market environment — ideal reading for traders and investors weighing a mature, cash-rich industry leader against a faster-growing but less profitable challenger.

CRM Overview and Recent Performance

Salesforce is the world's largest cloud-based customer relationship management (CRM) platform, with annual revenue surpassing $41 billion in its most recent fiscal year. The company's product ecosystem spans sales, service, marketing, analytics, integration, and collaboration — anchored by its Customer 360 platform and amplified by acquisitions including Slack, Tableau, MuleSoft, and Informatica. In recent quarters, Salesforce has positioned Agentforce — its suite of autonomous AI agents — as the centerpiece of its growth strategy. The company reported that Agentforce and Data 360 annual recurring revenue (ARR) reached nearly $1.4 billion, up 114% year-over-year, with over 9,500 paid Agentforce deals closed since launch.

Despite these AI-driven milestones, CRM shares have experienced considerable pressure in recent market activity. The stock has traded substantially below its 52-week high, reflecting investor concerns about decelerating revenue growth in the company's core subscription business, where growth has settled into the high single digits. Salesforce's strong GAAP profitability — with non-GAAP operating margins above 34% — and its massive capital return program, including a $50 billion share repurchase authorization, provide a stabilizing counterbalance. The forward valuation has contracted meaningfully, with the stock's forward P/E (price-to-earnings ratio) dipping into the low teens, a level that has historically attracted value-conscious investors.

TEAM Overview and Recent Performance

Atlassian is a leading provider of team collaboration and productivity software, best known for products such as Jira, Confluence, Trello, and Bitbucket. The company serves over 300,000 customers globally, with approximately 80% of the Fortune 500 using its tools. Atlassian's fiscal year 2025 revenue exceeded $5.2 billion, representing approximately 20% growth year-over-year. Cloud revenue has been a particular bright spot, growing 26% in recent quarters and crossing the $1 billion quarterly threshold for the first time, driven by accelerating migrations from on-premise Data Center deployments and robust seat expansion.

On the AI front, Atlassian's Rovo platform has gained meaningful traction, surpassing 5 million monthly active users. The company's AI capabilities have been cited by management as a primary catalyst for enterprise upgrades to the Teamwork Collection, which sold over one million seats in under nine months. However, TEAM shares have also endured a challenging period in recent market activity, with significant retracement from their 52-week highs. While Atlassian's non-GAAP operating margin of approximately 24% reflects improving operational discipline, the company remains GAAP unprofitable — an important distinction for risk-conscious investors. Revenue growth guidance in the 18-20% range for the current fiscal year underscores sustained demand, though the pace represents a measured deceleration from prior years.

Trending AI Robots

For investors seeking a data-driven approach to navigating stocks like CRM and TEAM, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed for current market conditions. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and forex — each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance track record, and risk profile. However, only the most effective and market-appropriate bots earn a place in the Trending AI Robots section. These bots are evaluated based on statistical performance metrics, including win rates, profit factors, and trade frequency, helping users quickly identify strategies that have demonstrated consistency. Whether traders favor short-term momentum plays or longer-duration swing strategies, the Trending AI Robots page provides a streamlined entry point into algorithmic trading tailored to real-time market dynamics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When comparing CRM and TEAM side by side, several structural contrasts stand out. Salesforce operates at roughly eight times the annual revenue scale of Atlassian and generates substantial GAAP net income — a function of its mature subscription base and disciplined cost management. Atlassian, by contrast, is reinvesting aggressively in cloud infrastructure, AI development, and enterprise sales capacity, which keeps GAAP earnings negative but supports a higher organic growth rate.

In terms of business model, Salesforce derives roughly 94% of its revenue from subscription and support contracts with large enterprises, providing high visibility into future cash flows. Atlassian follows a similar recurring revenue model but relies more heavily on a land-and-expand approach, where free or low-cost product adoption within teams gradually converts into paid enterprise-wide deployments. This strategy has produced a cloud net revenue retention rate of 120%, signaling strong expansion within existing accounts.

On the risk side, Salesforce faces the challenge of market saturation in its core CRM categories, with growth in Sales Cloud and Service Cloud moderating. Atlassian must contend with the uncertainty of sustained enterprise IT spending, particularly as AI tools raise questions about the future of knowledge-worker headcount, which directly influences seat-based pricing models. Both companies face competitive pressure from AI-native entrants seeking to disrupt traditional SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) incumbents.

Sector exposure offers another point of differentiation. Salesforce serves a broad cross-section of industries — including financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, and government — while Atlassian's core strength lies within technology and engineering teams, though it is increasingly expanding into non-technical departments such as HR, finance, and operations.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, financial stability, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward CRM in the current environment. The reasoning centers on Salesforce's combination of compressed valuation multiples, robust free cash flow generation exceeding $13 billion annually, and the early but tangible monetization of its Agentforce AI platform. While Atlassian's (TEAM) higher revenue growth rate is compelling, the absence of GAAP profitability and the stock's elevated valuation relative to current earnings introduce greater statistical uncertainty in AI-driven trend analysis. An AI model evaluating probabilistic outcomes would likely recognize Salesforce's margin of safety — underpinned by dividends, aggressive buybacks, and operational maturity — as offering a more favorable risk-reward profile, though Atlassian's long-term growth narrative remains a credible counterargument should AI adoption accelerate faster than consensus expectations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CRM vs. TEAM commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRM is a StrongBuy and TEAM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (CRM: $156.93 vs. TEAM: $80.15)
Brand notoriety: CRM and TEAM are both notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRM: 76% vs. TEAM: 56%
Market capitalization -- CRM: $128.53B vs. TEAM: $20.34B
CRM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $128.53B. TEAM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $20.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $397.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTEAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TEAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRM is a better buy in the long-term than TEAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEAM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TEAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CRM is a better buy in the short-term than TEAM.

Price Growth

CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.12% price change this week, while TEAM (@Packaged Software) price change was -13.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -4.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRM is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.

TEAM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-4.90% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRM($129B) has a higher market cap than TEAM($20.3B). CRM YTD gains are higher at: -40.460 vs. TEAM (-50.567). CRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 13.7B vs. TEAM (-21.17M). CRM has more cash in the bank: 11.8B vs. TEAM (1.14B). TEAM has less debt than CRM: TEAM (1.24B) vs CRM (41.9B). CRM has higher revenues than TEAM: CRM (42.8B) vs TEAM (6.19B).
CRMTEAMCRM / TEAM
Capitalization129B20.3B635%
EBITDA13.7B-21.17M-64,711%
Gain YTD-40.460-50.56780%
P/E Ratio18.18N/A-
Revenue42.8B6.19B691%
Total Cash11.8B1.14B1,039%
Total Debt41.9B1.24B3,371%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRM vs TEAM: Fundamental Ratings
CRM
TEAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1430
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9518
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRM's Valuation (14) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for TEAM (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew significantly faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.

CRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TEAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.

CRM's SMR Rating (52) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEAM (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.

TEAM's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CRM (61) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew similarly to CRM’s over the last 12 months.

TEAM's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRM (95) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew significantly faster than CRM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRMTEAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TEAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JZ2.590.32
+14.10%
Jianzhi Education Technology Group Co Ltd
OGG2.280.03
+1.33%
Osisko Gold Group Inc
INSM107.410.77
+0.72%
Insmed
ATRO71.000.11
+0.16%
Astronics Corp
HYNE16.36-0.19
-1.15%
Hoyne Bancorp Inc.

CRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRM
1D Price
Change %
CRM100%
-3.72%
NOW - CRM
78%
Closely correlated
-3.69%
HUBS - CRM
77%
Closely correlated
-7.27%
WDAY - CRM
75%
Closely correlated
-3.44%
TEAM - CRM
72%
Closely correlated
-6.15%
FRSH - CRM
71%
Closely correlated
-2.88%
More

TEAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEAM has been closely correlated with WDAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEAM jumps, then WDAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TEAM
1D Price
Change %
TEAM100%
-6.15%
WDAY - TEAM
74%
Closely correlated
-3.44%
HUBS - TEAM
73%
Closely correlated
-7.27%
ASAN - TEAM
71%
Closely correlated
-4.51%
FRSH - TEAM
70%
Closely correlated
-2.88%
PCTY - TEAM
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
More