Investors and traders often compare Salesforce (CRM) and Atlassian (TEAM) to evaluate opportunities within the cloud-based enterprise software space. These stocks attract attention from those seeking exposure to digital transformation trends, where customer relationship management and team productivity tools play central roles. The comparison is particularly relevant for market participants monitoring relative performance, sector positioning, and momentum shifts amid evolving artificial intelligence adoption. Both companies report quarterly results that influence broader sentiment toward technology spending, making this analysis useful for assessing potential portfolio allocations in a dynamic market environment.
Salesforce (CRM) provides customer relationship management (CRM) platforms and cloud applications that help businesses manage sales, service, and marketing operations. In recent market activity, the stock has demonstrated steady performance with year-to-date returns exceeding the S&P 500 benchmark, driven by ongoing demand for its enterprise solutions. Sentiment has been influenced by progress in artificial intelligence features, including the Agentforce platform, which has contributed to analyst commentary and price target adjustments. Broader market activity around upcoming earnings has added volatility, yet the company maintains a position supported by recurring revenue streams and large customer base.
Atlassian (TEAM) develops collaboration and productivity software, including Jira for project tracking and Confluence for documentation, primarily serving software development and IT teams. In recent market activity, the stock experienced a notable surge following fiscal fourth-quarter results that highlighted robust cloud revenue growth and exceeded analyst expectations. Year-to-date performance has been positive though more modest compared to broader indices, with momentum tied to cloud transition and AI-related enhancements in its offerings. Investor focus has centered on forward guidance and sustained adoption of its tools amid competitive pressures in the collaboration software segment.
Tickeron operates a platform featuring hundreds of AI trading bots that execute strategies across thousands of different tickers. Only the best-performing and most suitable bots for prevailing market conditions are featured in the curated Trending AI Robots section. Available bots span a range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with historical statistics often showing varied win rates and returns depending on market regimes. This diversity allows users to explore options aligned with specific risk tolerances and objectives. Review the Trending AI Robots page for current selections and detailed bot statistics.
Salesforce (CRM) and Atlassian (TEAM) differ significantly in business models, with CRM emphasizing comprehensive customer relationship management platforms for sales and service teams, while TEAM specializes in agile project management and collaboration tools targeted at development and operations workflows. Growth drivers for CRM include expansion of artificial intelligence capabilities within its ecosystem, whereas TEAM benefits from accelerating cloud migration and increased demand for integrated productivity solutions. Recent momentum favors TEAM following its earnings-driven rally, contrasted with CRM’s more gradual recovery supported by recurring revenue visibility. Risk factors for both include exposure to enterprise budget constraints and competition from larger cloud providers. Sector exposure remains concentrated in software-as-a-service, with market sentiment reflecting broader technology valuation dynamics and AI adoption trends. Trade-offs emerge in scale versus specialization, where CRM offers greater diversification and TEAM provides focused exposure to collaboration software cycles.
Based on observable factors including recent trend consistency and earnings-driven catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a probabilistic edge to Atlassian (TEAM) due to its post-earnings momentum and cloud growth indicators. Salesforce (CRM) shows relative stability through diversified enterprise positioning but faces near-term scrutiny ahead of its earnings release. The assessment remains probabilistic and subject to shifts in market conditions or additional data points.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTEAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRM’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEAM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while TEAM (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.47%.
CRM is expected to report earnings on Dec 08, 2026.
TEAM is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRM | TEAM | CRM / TEAM | |
| Capitalization | 213B | 48B | 444% |
| EBITDA | 16.4B | 212M | 7,736% |
| Gain YTD | -1.646 | 16.924 | -10% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.74 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 43.9B | 6.57B | 668% |
| Total Cash | 11.4B | 1.24B | 919% |
| Total Debt | 41.7B | 1.23B | 3,382% |
CRM | TEAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CRM's Valuation (17) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for TEAM (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew significantly faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TEAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's SMR Rating (48) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEAM (92) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
CRM's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TEAM (34) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.
TEAM's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRM (83) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew significantly faster than CRM’s over the last 12 months.
| CRM | TEAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 69% | 8 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 66% | 6 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 74% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRM has been closely correlated with NOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRM jumps, then NOW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRM | 100% | -1.97% | ||
| NOW - CRM | 78% Closely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| HUBS - CRM | 76% Closely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| ADBE - CRM | 75% Closely correlated | -6.73% | ||
| WDAY - CRM | 75% Closely correlated | -5.38% | ||
| TEAM - CRM | 72% Closely correlated | -2.62% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TEAM has been closely correlated with ASAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TEAM jumps, then ASAN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TEAM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | 100% | -2.62% | ||
| ASAN - TEAM | 72% Closely correlated | -12.69% | ||
| SPT - TEAM | 71% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| CRM - TEAM | 71% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| WDAY - TEAM | 70% Closely correlated | -5.38% | ||
| HUBS - TEAM | 69% Closely correlated | -2.95% | ||
More | ||||