CRM
Price
$172.46
Change
+$7.50 (+4.55%)
Updated
Apr 13, 03:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
152.26B
51 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TEAM
Price
$61.09
Change
+$3.94 (+6.89%)
Updated
Apr 13, 02:39 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.07B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CRM vs TEAM

Header iconCRM vs TEAM Comparison
Open Charts CRM vs TEAMBanner chart's image
CRM vs TEAM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Salesforce (CRM) vs. Atlassian (TEAM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Salesforce (CRM) boasts a market cap of approximately $155 billion with trailing twelve-month (TTM) revenue of $41.5 billion, dwarfing Atlassian's (TEAM) $15 billion market cap and $5.8 billion TTM revenue.
  • Recent market activity has pressured both stocks amid AI disruption fears, but CRM shows resilient AI momentum via Agentforce, with $800 million annual recurring revenue (ARR), up 169% year-over-year.
  • TEAM has faced steeper declines, down over 60% year-to-date, linked to workforce cuts and AI agent concerns, despite strong cloud revenue growth.
  • Valuation metrics favor CRM with a forward P/E of 13 versus TEAM's 12, but CRM delivers profitability with positive EPS.
  • Tickeron's AI analysis indicates upward potential for CRM from oversold indicators, while TEAM shows mixed signals in recent volatility.
  • Both companies integrate AI to counter sector headwinds, but CRM's scale and enterprise adoption provide relative stability.

Introduction

This stock comparison between Salesforce (CRM) and Atlassian (TEAM) examines two leaders in enterprise software amid evolving AI-driven market dynamics. Both firms provide cloud-based tools for customer relationship management and team collaboration, respectively, appealing to investors tracking SaaS growth, relative performance, and market positioning. Traders focused on short-term momentum and long-term stability in the software sector will find value in analyzing their recent trajectories, AI integrations, and head-to-head metrics. As AI reshapes workflows, understanding contrasts in scale, profitability, and sentiment shifts offers insights for portfolio decisions.

CRM Overview and Recent Performance

Salesforce (CRM), a pioneer in customer relationship management (CRM) software, delivers cloud-based platforms that unify sales, service, marketing, and analytics for enterprises worldwide. Its ecosystem includes Agentforce, an AI agent platform enabling autonomous workflows, alongside Data Cloud for unified data management and Slack for collaboration.

In recent market activity, CRM shares have traded around $165, reflecting pressure from broader software sector selloffs tied to AI disruption fears. Year-to-date declines approach 35%, yet fundamentals remain robust with TTM revenue at $41.5 billion and positive EPS of $7.81. Key drivers include Agentforce's explosive growth—$800 million ARR, up 169% year-over-year, with over 29,000 deals closed—and combined AI offerings exceeding $2.9 billion ARR, up 200%. These catalysts, alongside cost efficiencies boosting margins, have supported sentiment despite volatility, with Tickeron's AI signaling potential upside from oversold conditions.

TEAM Overview and Recent Performance

Atlassian (TEAM) specializes in collaboration software, powering team productivity through tools like Jira for project management, Confluence for documentation, and Loom for video communication. Its portfolio targets software development, IT service management, and enterprise agility.

Recent weeks have seen TEAM shares hover near $57, down over 60% year-to-date amid AI-related concerns and a 10% workforce reduction (about 1,600 jobs) to fund AI and enterprise sales investments. TTM revenue stands at $5.8 billion with quarterly growth around 23%, but losses persist with negative EPS of -$0.72. Sentiment reflects fears of AI agents eroding per-seat subscriptions, exacerbated by restructuring and analyst target cuts. However, cloud migration accelerates, with innovations in AI-enhanced features showing promise, though Tickeron's analysis notes bearish momentum alongside oversold bounces.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze and trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots earn their spot through superior adaptation to current market conditions, leveraging machine learning for strategies like trend tracking, hedging, and volatility plays on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Standout stats include annualized returns up to 153%, win rates ranging 53% to 87%, and profit factors exceeding 11 in recent volatility. Multi-agent systems and financial learning models deliver edges in sectors like semiconductors and energy, outperforming benchmarks such as the S&P 500. Explore these tools to enhance your trading across diverse styles and assets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Salesforce (CRM) and Atlassian (TEAM) operate in complementary SaaS niches—CRM focuses on customer-facing automation, while TEAM emphasizes internal collaboration—but share exposure to AI-driven transformation. CRM's scale ($155B market cap vs. $15B) and profitability (17.96% margins) contrast TEAM's growth-oriented but loss-making model (-3% operating margins).

Growth drivers diverge: CRM leverages Agentforce for rapid AI ARR expansion, while TEAM pushes cloud migrations amid restructuring. Recent momentum favors neither unequivocally—both hit multi-year lows on AI fears—but CRM exhibits steadier trends. Risk factors include sector-wide AI disruption potentially compressing seats/pricing for TEAM more acutely, given its per-user reliance, versus CRM's agentic diversification. Market sentiment tilts toward CRM's enterprise stickiness, though both trade at attractive forward multiples (~13 P/E).

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors Salesforce (CRM) over Atlassian (TEAM). Bullish signals like oversold Stochastic and Aroon uptrends, combined with Agentforce catalysts and superior scale/stability, position CRM for higher probability of relative outperformance. TEAM's mixed indicators and restructuring risks suggest greater volatility, though cloud/AI initiatives could catalyze rebounds. Observable trend consistency and positioning tilt probabilistically toward CRM in the near term.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CRM vs. TEAM commentary
Apr 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRM is a Buy and TEAM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 13, 2026
Stock price -- (CRM: $164.96 vs. TEAM: $57.15)
Brand notoriety: CRM and TEAM are both notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRM: 141% vs. TEAM: 151%
Market capitalization -- CRM: $152.26B vs. TEAM: $15.07B
CRM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $152.26B. TEAM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $15.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $190.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $5.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTEAM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CRM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TEAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRM is a better buy in the long-term than TEAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TEAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CRM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TEAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CRM and TEAM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -11.65% price change this week, while TEAM (@Packaged Software) price change was -16.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRM is expected to report earnings on Jun 03, 2026.

TEAM is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.31% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRM($152B) has a higher market cap than TEAM($15.1B). CRM YTD gains are higher at: -37.574 vs. TEAM (-64.753). CRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.5B vs. TEAM (9.83M). CRM has more cash in the bank: 1.8B vs. TEAM (1.57B). TEAM has less debt than CRM: TEAM (1.22B) vs CRM (17.2B). CRM has higher revenues than TEAM: CRM (41.5B) vs TEAM (5.76B).
CRMTEAMCRM / TEAM
Capitalization152B15.1B1,007%
EBITDA12.5B9.83M127,214%
Gain YTD-37.574-64.75358%
P/E Ratio21.15N/A-
Revenue41.5B5.76B720%
Total Cash1.8B1.57B115%
Total Debt17.2B1.22B1,416%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRM vs TEAM: Fundamental Ratings
CRM
TEAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5993
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6595
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9424
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
43n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRM's Valuation (23) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for TEAM (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew significantly faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.

CRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TEAM (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.

CRM's SMR Rating (59) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TEAM (93) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than TEAM’s over the last 12 months.

CRM's Price Growth Rating (65) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as TEAM (95) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRM’s stock grew similarly to TEAM’s over the last 12 months.

TEAM's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRM (94) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that TEAM’s stock grew significantly faster than CRM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRMTEAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CRM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TEAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STK41.610.25
+0.60%
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund
QQMG41.970.10
+0.23%
Invesco ESG NASDAQ 100 ETF
EMES22.32N/A
N/A
Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF
FORH24.80N/A
N/A
Formidable ETF
XLV147.31-2.02
-1.35%
State Street®HlthCrSelSectSPDR®ETF