Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CRQSX vs RWEBX
CRQSX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts CRQSX vs RWEBX
CRQSX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CRQSX (4.66B). CRQSX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: CRQSX (0.96) vs RWEBX (0.76). CRQSX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: CRQSX (5 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CRQSX (0.11). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. CRQSX (26.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CRQSX: RWEBX (250) vs CRQSX (3000000). CRQSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.73 vs. RWEBX (5.83).
| CRQSX | RWEBX | CRQSX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.09 | 1.06 | 8% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 1.06 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.467 | 3.562 | 266% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 3000000 | 250 | 1,200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.66B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.96 | 0.76 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.73 | 5.83 | 287% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.83 | 27.58 | 239% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 23.91 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 74.85 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSILX | 22.74 | 0.38 | +1.70% |
| Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps C | |||
| APHQX | 15.62 | 0.16 | +1.03% |
| Artisan Mid Cap Value Institutional | |||
| MFWBX | 18.78 | 0.19 | +1.02% |
| MFS Global Total Return B | |||
| TORIX | 22.97 | 0.19 | +0.83% |
| Tortoise Energy Infrastructure TR Ins | |||
| TRCLX | 19.10 | -0.80 | -4.02% |
| T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I | |||