CRS vs GFF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRS is a Buy and GFF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- CRS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GFF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CRS (@Metal Fabrication) experienced а -1.62% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Metal Fabrication industry was -3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.85%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRS is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Metal Fabrication (-3.05% weekly)The industry is involved in value-added processes including creation of metal structures like machines and parts by cutting, bending and assembling, using various raw materials. A fabrication shop often bids on a project/job, and then builds the product if awarded the contract. Robotics and automation are making their way into the industry apparently to fill in skills gap[s19] . RBC Bearings Incorporated, Timken Company and Valmont Industries, Inc. are some of the largest metal fabrication companies in the U.S.
| CRS | GFF | CRS / GFF | |
| Capitalization | 8.6B | 3.63B | 237% |
| EBITDA | 461M | 270M | 171% |
| Gain YTD | 145.852 | 20.208 | 722% |
| P/E Ratio | 38.44 | 53.09 | 72% |
| Revenue | 2.83B | 2.68B | 105% |
| Total Cash | 150M | 111M | 135% |
| Total Debt | 703M | 1.63B | 43% |
CRS | GFF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 15 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GFF's Valuation (75) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as CRS (80) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to CRS’s over the last 12 months.
CRS's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as GFF (7) in the Building Products industry. This means that CRS’s stock grew similarly to GFF’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's SMR Rating (15) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRS (56) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRS’s over the last 12 months.
CRS's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as GFF (49) in the Building Products industry. This means that CRS’s stock grew similarly to GFF’s over the last 12 months.
CRS's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Metal Fabrication industry is significantly better than the same rating for GFF (96) in the Building Products industry. This means that CRS’s stock grew significantly faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.
| CRS | GFF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 30 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 79% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IMOM | 27.83 | 0.21 | +0.76% |
| Alpha Architect Intl Quant Momt ETF | |||
| DIVI | 29.98 | 0.17 | +0.57% |
| Franklin Intl Core Div Tlt Idx ETF | |||
| MDLV | 25.96 | 0.13 | +0.50% |
| Morgan Dempsey Large Cap Value ETF | |||
| BUFG | 24.67 | 0.10 | +0.41% |
| FT Vest Buffered Allocation Gr ETF | |||
| EMB | 89.33 | -0.23 | -0.26% |
| iShares JP Morgan USD Em Mkts Bd ETF | |||
CRS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRS has been loosely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRS jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.
GFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFF has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFF jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.