Advertisement
GFF vs MAS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Griffon Corporation (GFF) vs. Masco Corporation (MAS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- GFF has delivered stronger year-to-date gains of approximately 24% compared to MAS's 6%, reflecting robust momentum in recent market activity.
- Both companies operate in home and building products but GFF offers diversification into consumer tools, potentially buffering housing sector volatility.
- MAS boasts higher profit margins around 11% and a more attractive price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 17 versus GFF's 90.
- Recent quarterly revenue growth was modestly positive for GFF at 3% year-over-year, while MAS saw a slight decline.
- Analyst price targets suggest upside potential for both, with GFF at around 105 and MAS near 74.
- Housing market softness impacts both, but GFF's recent earnings beat supports positive sentiment.
Introduction
Griffon Corporation (GFF) and Masco Corporation (MAS) are key players in the home improvement and building products sector, making them compelling comparables for investors tracking residential construction and consumer spending trends. Both stocks have navigated housing market headwinds, yet exhibit distinct performance profiles amid recent economic shifts. Traders seeking momentum opportunities or value plays, and long-term investors assessing sector recovery potential, will find value in this head-to-head analysis of their business models, financial metrics, and market positioning. This comparison highlights relative strengths in growth, stability, and risk for informed decision-making in today's volatile environment.
GFF Overview and Recent Performance
Griffon Corporation (GFF) is a diversified holding company operating in home and building products—such as garage doors and openers—and consumer and professional products, including tools and garden items. These segments serve dealers, retailers, and homebuilders globally. In recent market activity, GFF shares have surged, with monthly gains exceeding 20% and year-to-date returns around 24%, trading near $91 within a 52-week range of $65 to $98. Sentiment has been buoyed by a first-quarter 2026 earnings beat, with EPS of $1.45 surpassing estimates despite softer housing demand prompting revised full-year guidance. Elevated return on equity (ROE) at 27% underscores operational strength, though high debt levels and a lofty P/E ratio signal risks in a cyclical sector.
MAS Overview and Recent Performance
Masco Corporation (MAS) designs and distributes home improvement products, focusing on plumbing fixtures like faucets and showers, as well as decorative architectural items such as paints and hardware under brands like Delta and Behr. It targets retailers, wholesalers, and contractors across North America and Europe. Recently, MAS shares have shown modest gains, with year-to-date up about 6% and trading around $67 in a 52-week range of $57 to $79. Performance reflects steady demand in repair-and-remodel (R&R) markets, though upcoming first-quarter earnings are anticipated to show slight sales growth amid housing pressures. Stronger profit margins near 11% and a reasonable P/E of 17 provide stability, supported by ROA of 15%, despite high leverage.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page features 25 top performers curated from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like momentum trading, swing dips, and paired long/short positions, with timeframes from 5-minute scalps to 55-day holds. Standout stats include annualized returns of 15% to 168%, win rates of 54% to 88%, and profit factors up to 12, targeting hot sectors such as semiconductors (e.g., NVDA, SOXL), industrials, and gold miners. Excelling in volatile conditions, they adapt via AI/ML for real-time signals and risk controls. Traders can copy these virtually to match styles and market focus—explore the page to identify bots aligning with your portfolio.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both GFF and MAS thrive in home products but differ in scope: GFF's consumer tools add diversification beyond MAS's plumbing and paints emphasis. Growth drivers favor GFF with positive revenue momentum versus MAS's contraction, fueling superior recent price action. Risk profiles contrast, with GFF's beta of 1.3 indicating higher volatility than MAS's 1.05, tied to new construction exposure. Sector sensitivity to housing weighs on both, yet MAS benefits from R&R resilience. Market sentiment leans toward GFF for upside potential, while MAS offers value trade-offs via superior margins and scale (market cap over 3x larger).
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI tools currently lean toward GFF based on consistent upward trends, stronger relative momentum, and earnings catalysts in recent activity. While MAS provides stability with better valuation metrics, GFF's positioning suggests higher probability of near-term outperformance amid sector rotation.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFF is a StrongBuy and MAS is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMAS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MAS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MAS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
GFF (@Building Products) experienced а -5.59% price change this week, while MAS (@Building Products) price change was -1.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
GFF is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
MAS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Building Products (-1.19% weekly)The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.
| GFF | MAS | GFF / MAS | |
| Capitalization | 4.14B | 14.8B | 28% |
| EBITDA | 275M | 1.27B | 22% |
| Gain YTD | 22.043 | 17.001 | 130% |
| P/E Ratio | 87.68 | 18.21 | 481% |
| Revenue | 2.53B | 7.68B | 33% |
| Total Cash | 110M | 388M | 28% |
| Total Debt | 1.48B | 3.3B | 45% |
GFF | MAS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 36 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 17 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GFF's Valuation (81) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as MAS (94). This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to MAS’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAS (60). This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAS’s over the last 12 months.
MAS's SMR Rating (2) in the Building Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for GFF (87). This means that MAS’s stock grew significantly faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.
MAS's Price Growth Rating (17) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as GFF (41). This means that MAS’s stock grew similarly to GFF’s over the last 12 months.
GFF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MAS (46). This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MAS’s over the last 12 months.
| GFF | MAS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 73% | 8 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 61% | 16 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WDNA | 19.03 | 0.17 | +0.90% |
| WisdomTree BioRevolution ETF | |||
| IQDY | 43.76 | 0.30 | +0.69% |
| FlexShares Intl Qual Div Dynamic ETF | |||
| SIXH | 42.77 | 0.23 | +0.55% |
| ETC 6 Meridian Hdg Eq-Idx Opt Strat ETF | |||
| GBIL | 100.07 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Yr ETF | |||
| RTXG | 20.70 | -0.97 | -4.49% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long Rtx Daily ETF | |||
GFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFF has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFF jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.