GFF
Price
$86.17
Change
-$1.73 (-1.97%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
3.95B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OC
Price
$138.90
Change
+$0.08 (+0.06%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
11.19B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GFF vs OC

GFF vs OC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GFF vs. OC commentary
Aug 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFF is a StrongBuy and OC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2026
Stock price -- (GFF: $86.17 vs. OC: $138.90)
Brand notoriety: GFF: Not notable vs. OC: Notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GFF: 95% vs. OC: 48%
Market capitalization -- GFF: $3.95B vs. OC: $11.19B
GFF [@Building Products] is valued at $3.95B. OC’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $11.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $100.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $10.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GFF is a better buy in the long-term than OC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • OC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OC is a better buy in the short-term than GFF.

Price Growth

GFF (@Building Products) experienced а -4.91% price change this week, while OC (@Building Products) price change was -2.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

GFF is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

OC is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-2.54% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OC($11.2B) has a higher market cap than GFF($3.95B). GFF has higher P/E ratio than OC: GFF (84.48) vs OC (15.02). OC YTD gains are higher at: 26.584 vs. GFF (17.594). OC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 782M vs. GFF (275M). GFF has less debt than OC: GFF (1.48B) vs OC (6.02B). OC has higher revenues than GFF: OC (9.84B) vs GFF (2.53B).
GFFOCGFF / OC
Capitalization3.95B11.2B35%
EBITDA275M782M35%
Gain YTD17.59426.58466%
P/E Ratio84.4815.02562%
Revenue2.53B9.84B26%
Total Cash110MN/A-
Total Debt1.48B6.02B24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GFF vs OC: Fundamental Ratings
GFF
OC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7355
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1571
SMR RATING
1..100
8795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5852
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
353
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OC's Valuation (14) in the Construction Materials industry is significantly better than the same rating for GFF (97) in the Building Products industry. This means that OC’s stock grew significantly faster than GFF’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OC (71) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OC’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's SMR Rating (87) in the Building Products industry is in the same range as OC (95) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew similarly to OC’s over the last 12 months.

OC's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Construction Materials industry is in the same range as GFF (58) in the Building Products industry. This means that OC’s stock grew similarly to GFF’s over the last 12 months.

GFF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Building Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OC (53) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that GFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than OC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GFFOC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GFF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KLIP24.190.07
+0.31%
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strat ETF
USFE35.43N/A
N/A
First Eagle US Equity ETF
XDEF22.73N/A
-0.02%
Xtrackers Europe Defense TechnologiesETF
DWX47.88-0.61
-1.26%
State Street® SPDR® S&P® Intl Div ETF
GUNR52.34-0.71
-1.34%
FlexShares Mstar Glbl Upstrm Nat Res ETF

GFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GFF has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GFF jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GFF
1D Price
Change %
GFF100%
-1.97%
BLDR - GFF
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
MAS - GFF
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.87%
LPX - GFF
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
NX - GFF
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
OC - GFF
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
More

OC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OC has been closely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OC jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OC
1D Price
Change %
OC100%
+0.06%
BLDR - OC
72%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
FBIN - OC
69%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
MAS - OC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.87%
IR - OC
67%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
BXC - OC
67%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
More