Advertisement
CRWD vs FTNT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) vs. Fortinet (FTNT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both CRWD and FTNT operate in the cybersecurity sector, offering exposure to rising demand for enterprise security solutions amid evolving threats.
- FTNT has delivered stronger year-to-date performance with approximately 93% returns compared to roughly 64% for CRWD, reflecting differences in recent momentum.
- CRWD faces near-term focus on its upcoming quarterly earnings report, while FTNT has reported solid revenue growth in recent quarters.
- Valuation metrics show FTNT trading at more moderate multiples relative to CRWD, highlighting a potential trade-off between growth expectations and current pricing.
- Sector-wide factors, including broader technology market sentiment and macroeconomic influences, have contributed to volatility in both stocks over recent weeks.
- Relative positioning suggests investors may weigh CRWD's established platform scale against FTNT's profitability and refresh cycle dynamics.
Introduction
CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) and Fortinet (FTNT) represent two prominent players in the cybersecurity industry, making their stock comparison relevant for investors and traders seeking exposure to digital defense technologies. This analysis examines their business models, recent price behavior, and market positioning in the current environment. Market participants focused on sector trends, relative performance, and risk-adjusted opportunities may find the comparison useful for portfolio allocation decisions. The review draws on observable data to highlight contrasts without forward-looking speculation.
CRWD Overview and Recent Performance
CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) provides cloud-native endpoint security and threat intelligence services through its Falcon platform. In recent market activity, the stock has shown resilience amid broader technology sector fluctuations, with year-to-date gains near 64%. Recent weeks have included pullbacks from prior highs, influenced by valuation considerations ahead of the company's scheduled quarterly earnings release. Analyst commentary has noted ongoing interest in the firm's recurring revenue profile, while macro factors have contributed to price swings observed across growth-oriented names.
FTNT Overview and Recent Performance
Fortinet (FTNT) delivers integrated security solutions, including network firewalls and secure access service edge offerings. The stock has posted year-to-date returns around 93% amid recent market activity. Performance in recent weeks reflects continued investor attention following reported revenue expansion and product refresh cycles. Broader sector sentiment and profit-taking episodes have introduced volatility, consistent with patterns seen in other cybersecurity equities during the period.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions featured in the trending section. Available bots exhibit a range of historical metrics, including win rates, drawdowns, and return profiles tailored to different risk tolerances and market environments. The page provides traders with transparent access to these options for further evaluation. Review the Trending AI Robots section for detailed bot profiles and performance data.
Head-to-Head Comparison
In terms of business models, CRWD emphasizes cloud-delivered endpoint protection with a subscription focus, while FTNT integrates hardware and software across network security layers. Growth drivers differ, with CRWD tied to platform adoption and FTNT benefiting from hardware refresh opportunities. Recent momentum favors FTNT on a year-to-date basis, though both have faced sector-wide pressures. Risk factors include high valuations for CRWD versus more moderate multiples for FTNT, alongside shared exposure to cybersecurity demand cycles. Market sentiment reflects institutional interest in both, tempered by broader technology volatility.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as relative year-to-date performance, earnings visibility, and positioning within the sector, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probabilistic weighting to FTNT in trend consistency and stability metrics. CRWD retains relevance through its upcoming catalysts but shows greater sensitivity to near-term sentiment shifts in available data.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWD is a Buy and FTNT is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFTNT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CRWD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FTNT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTNT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRWD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- FTNT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а -2.43% price change this week, while FTNT (@Computer Communications) price change was -5.85% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2026.
FTNT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-1.84% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| CRWD | FTNT | CRWD / FTNT | |
| Capitalization | 218B | 115B | 190% |
| EBITDA | 423M | 2.8B | 15% |
| Gain YTD | 81.841 | 96.814 | 85% |
| P/E Ratio | 5682.67 | 55.23 | 10,290% |
| Revenue | 5.4B | 7.53B | 72% |
| Total Cash | 5.01B | 4.07B | 123% |
| Total Debt | 820M | 497M | 165% |
CRWD | FTNT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 91 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 16 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FTNT's Valuation (91) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that FTNT’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as FTNT (16) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to FTNT’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's SMR Rating (12) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRWD (89) in the null industry. This means that FTNT’s stock grew significantly faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FTNT (38) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to FTNT’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CRWD (11) in the null industry. This means that FTNT’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | FTNT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 82% | 12 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
CRWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| PANW - CRWD | 82% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| OKTA - CRWD | 75% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| FTNT - CRWD | 71% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| TENB - CRWD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| NOW - CRWD | 68% Closely correlated | -2.97% | ||
More | ||||