Advertisement
CRWD vs FTNT
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) vs. Fortinet (FTNT) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both CRWD and FTNT operate in the cybersecurity sector, with CRWD focused on cloud-native endpoint protection and FTNT emphasizing network security and firewalls.
- In recent market activity, CRWD reached a new 52-week high near $731 amid pre-earnings momentum, while FTNT advanced to all-time highs above $134 following strong quarterly results and analyst upgrades.
- CRWD reported solid subscription revenue growth in its latest fiscal quarter, with annual recurring revenue (ARR) exceeding $4.4 billion.
- FTNT exceeded guidance in its first quarter of 2026, posting 20% year-over-year revenue growth to $1.85 billion and raising full-year outlook.
- Relative performance shows FTNT with stronger year-to-date gains, while CRWD exhibited sharper recent volatility tied to artificial intelligence (AI) security catalysts.
- Market sentiment for both remains constructive, supported by ongoing demand for cybersecurity solutions amid evolving digital threats.
Introduction
Cybersecurity remains a critical growth area within technology, driven by increasing digitalization and sophisticated threats. CRWD and FTNT represent two prominent players with distinct approaches to security solutions. This comparison examines their recent stock behavior, business fundamentals, and relative positioning. Institutional investors, active traders, and portfolio managers evaluating sector exposure or tactical allocations may find the analysis relevant for assessing risk-adjusted opportunities in the current environment.
CRWD Overview and Recent Performance
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud-delivered endpoint protection and related security services through its Falcon platform. In recent weeks, the stock demonstrated strong upward momentum, closing at approximately $731 on May 29, 2026, after an 8.94% single-day gain that established a new 52-week high. This advance occurred ahead of the company’s first-quarter fiscal 2027 earnings release scheduled for early June. Broader sentiment benefited from heightened focus on AI-driven security capabilities and multiple analyst price target increases. Year-to-date performance has been positive, though the shares have shown elevated volatility compared with broader market indices.
FTNT Overview and Recent Performance
Fortinet, Inc. delivers integrated network security solutions, including firewalls and related hardware and software products. The stock reached new all-time highs above $134 in late May 2026, supported by robust first-quarter 2026 results that exceeded expectations on revenue, billings, and margins. Revenue rose 20% year-over-year to $1.85 billion, prompting an upward revision to full-year guidance. Analyst upgrades, including higher price targets, contributed to positive sentiment. Year-to-date returns have outpaced many peers, reflecting sustained demand for the company’s security offerings amid expanding enterprise needs.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated section featuring its top-performing AI trading bots optimized for prevailing market conditions. The platform offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that execute strategies across thousands of different tickers, each employing distinct trading styles, timeframes, risk parameters, and performance metrics. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current trends and statistical robustness are highlighted in the Trending AI Robots section. This selective approach allows users to explore varied algorithmic strategies without exhaustive manual screening. For additional details on available bots and their characteristics, visit Trending AI Robots.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CRWD and FTNT both serve the cybersecurity market yet differ in core offerings: CRWD emphasizes software-centric, cloud-native endpoint detection and response, while FTNT integrates hardware and software for network perimeter defense. Growth drivers for CRWD center on subscription expansion and AI module adoption; FTNT benefits from product refresh cycles and billings momentum. Recent relative performance favors FTNT on a year-to-date basis, though CRWD exhibited sharper short-term gains tied to specific catalysts. Risk factors include valuation multiples for CRWD and hardware dependency for FTNT. Sector exposure remains comparable, with both sensitive to enterprise information technology spending and regulatory developments in data protection.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as recent trend consistency, earnings momentum, and analyst positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term performance to CRWD. The stock’s pre-earnings surge and alignment with AI security themes provide measurable tailwinds, although outcomes remain subject to broader market volatility and quarterly results. This assessment reflects data-driven pattern recognition rather than directional certainty.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWD is a Buy and FTNT is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFTNT’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).
- CRWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FTNT’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTNT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRWD’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- FTNT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а +1.76% price change this week, while FTNT (@Computer Communications) price change was +1.12% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.28%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Sep 02, 2026.
FTNT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-1.12% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| CRWD | FTNT | CRWD / FTNT | |
| Capitalization | 174B | 107B | 163% |
| EBITDA | 329M | 2.6B | 13% |
| Gain YTD | 45.661 | 84.234 | 54% |
| P/E Ratio | 765.02 | 56.71 | 1,349% |
| Revenue | 5.09B | 7.11B | 72% |
| Total Cash | 4.55B | 3.3B | 138% |
| Total Debt | 821M | 497M | 165% |
CRWD | FTNT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 95 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 4 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 26 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 38 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FTNT's Valuation (98) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that FTNT’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CRWD (18) in the null industry. This means that FTNT’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's SMR Rating (10) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRWD (92) in the null industry. This means that FTNT’s stock grew significantly faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (38) in the null industry. This means that FTNT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (67) in the null industry. This means that FTNT’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | FTNT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 7 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
FTNT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTNT has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTNT jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTNT | 100% | +0.85% | ||
| SHOP - FTNT | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| DT - FTNT | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| PANW - FTNT | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| CRWD - FTNT | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| CRM - FTNT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||