Cybersecurity remains one of the most closely watched corners of the technology market, and CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) and Fortinet (FTNT) are two of its largest, most recognizable names. Despite operating in the same broad industry, the two companies pursue very different strategies: one is a fast-growing, cloud-first subscription platform, while the other is a profitable leader in firewall hardware and converged networking. This stock comparison is relevant for investors and traders evaluating growth-versus-value trade-offs, sector exposure, and relative performance. By examining recent momentum, financial profiles, and market positioning side by side, readers can better understand how these two cybersecurity leaders stack up in the current market environment.
CRWD is CrowdStrike Holdings, an Austin, Texas-based cybersecurity company whose flagship Falcon platform delivers cloud-based protection for endpoints, identities, cloud workloads, and data. Its business is built on a subscription model, and the company has been aggressively expanding into adjacent areas such as identity protection, next-generation SIEM (security information and event management), and AI-driven detection and response.
In recent market activity, CRWD has been a standout performer. The stock rose more than 80% on a year-to-date basis before pulling back in a broader technology selloff, and its revenue growth has accelerated for several consecutive quarters. In its most recent reported quarter, revenue rose about 26% year over year while net new ARR (annual recurring revenue) reached a record, up roughly 51%. The Falcon Flex subscription program has become a central growth driver, and the company has raised its full-year outlook multiple times. Despite this momentum, CRWD still reports a slim or negative GAAP operating margin, and its valuation multiples remain well above historical averages, leaving the stock sensitive to any slowdown in growth expectations.
FTNT is Fortinet, a Sunnyvale, California-based company best known for its FortiGate firewall appliances and the broader Fortinet Security Fabric. It converges networking and security through a single operating system (FortiOS) and custom silicon (FortiASIC), and has been expanding into SASE (secure access service edge) and AI-driven security operations.
Fortinet's recent period has been a story of strong profits meeting a sharp sentiment reversal. For much of the year the stock rallied on accelerating firewall demand and raised guidance, gaining well over 100% year to date at its peak. Its most recent quarterly results showed revenue up roughly 20%, GAAP net income up more than 30%, and record non-GAAP operating margins. However, the company lowered its full-year services revenue outlook, which investors interpreted as a sign that hardware-led growth may not yet be converting into durable recurring revenue at the expected pace. The stock subsequently sold off sharply, retreating well below its recent highs, and several analysts trimmed their price targets.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots drawn from a much larger pool of automated strategies. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance history, and watchlist of symbols. Only the bots best suited to current market conditions earn a place in this featured section, giving traders a focused view of strategies that are performing well right now. Because these systems range across styles — from short-term momentum to longer-horizon trend following — they appeal to a wide variety of trading approaches. To explore which automated strategies are currently favored, visit the Trending AI Robots page.
The clearest contrast between the two names is business model and profitability. CRWD is a growth-first subscription platform: it is expanding revenue rapidly and winning larger multi-module deals, but it earns little reported profit and commands a premium valuation. FTNT is the profitability leader of the pair, with GAAP operating margins above 30%, substantial free cash flow, and a large cash balance — yet its growth is more tied to hardware refresh cycles and pricing than to recurring subscription expansion.
Momentum and sentiment also differ. CRWD has ridden AI-security enthusiasm and accelerating ARR growth to consistent relative outperformance, while FTNT's sharp post-earnings decline reflects investor concern that its services mix is lagging. On risk, CRWD's vulnerability is valuation and execution at elevated multiples, whereas FTNT's is margin pressure from rising component costs and uncertainty over how quickly product demand converts to services revenue. In short, CRWD offers higher growth and momentum at a higher price, while FTNT offers stronger current earnings at a discount following its recent reset.
Weighing trend consistency, relative performance, and catalyst quality, Tickeron's AI would currently lean toward CRWD over FTNT. CRWD has maintained a steadier upward trajectory, posted accelerating revenue and record ARR growth, and continues to benefit from durable demand for AI-native security — factors that algorithmic trend models tend to reward. FTNT's fundamentals remain strong, but its recent services-guidance cut and ensuing selloff introduce greater near-term uncertainty and volatility. The verdict is probabilistic rather than definitive: FTNT's discounted valuation and profitability could appeal to value-oriented strategies, but on current trend and momentum signals, the AI's edge goes to CRWD.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
CRWD may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 30 of 35 cases where CRWD's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 86%.
The RSI Indicator demonstrates that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 1 day, which means it's wise to expect a price bounce in the near future.
Following a +4.06% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CRWD advanced for three days, in 287 of 350 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 249 of 317 cases where CRWD Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 79%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 05, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CRWD as a result. In 56 of 89 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for CRWD turned negative on November 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 48 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 33 of the 48 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 69%.
CRWD moved below its 50-day moving average on November 04, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CRWD declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 72%.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 4 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 11 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 41 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CRWD’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 100 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (43.533) is normal, around the industry mean (16.360). CRWD's P/E Ratio (5784.000) is considerably higher than the industry average of (53.310). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (8.296) is also within normal values, averaging (3.696). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.434) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (45.662) is also within normal values, averaging (104.492).
FTNT may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options. In 33 of 41 cases where FTNT's price broke its lower Bollinger Band, its price rose further in the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 80%.
The RSI Indicator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 6 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an Uptrend is expected.
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 5 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a +2.52% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FTNT advanced for three days, in 226 of 329 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 170 of 221 cases where FTNT Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 77%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 16, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on FTNT as a result. In 56 of 86 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 65%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for FTNT turned negative on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 56 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 39 of the 56 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 70%.
FTNT moved below its 50-day moving average on October 29, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for FTNT crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 30, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 15 of 19 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 79%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FTNT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 64%.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 12 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 18 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 36 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 63 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. FTNT’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 94 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (56.215) is normal, around the industry mean (16.360). P/E Ratio (41.552) is within average values for comparable stocks, (53.310). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.939) is also within normal values, averaging (3.696). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.434) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (17.065) is also within normal values, averaging (104.492).
CRWD | FTNT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 52 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 36 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FTNT's Valuation (94) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that FTNT’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FTNT (52) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew somewhat faster than FTNT’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's SMR Rating (12) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for CRWD (89) in the null industry. This means that FTNT’s stock grew significantly faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FTNT (63) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to FTNT’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as FTNT (18) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to FTNT’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | FTNT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 77% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while FTNT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FTNT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а -13.39% price change this week, while FTNT (@Computer Communications) price change was -12.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -2.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.36%.
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2026.
FTNT is expected to report earnings on Feb 09, 2027.
Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| PANW - CRWD | 86% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| OKTA - CRWD | 79% Closely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| RBRK - CRWD | 74% Closely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| TENB - CRWD | 71% Closely correlated | -4.60% | ||
| S - CRWD | 71% Closely correlated | +1.63% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTNT has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FTNT jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTNT | 100% | -3.00% | ||
| CRWD - FTNT | 75% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| PANW - FTNT | 71% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| SHOP - FTNT | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.59% | ||
| DT - FTNT | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| RBRK - FTNT | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
More | ||||