Advertisement
FTNT vs PANW
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Fortinet (FTNT) vs. Palo Alto Networks (PANW) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- FTNT has outperformed PANW year-to-date (YTD, year-to-date) with gains of approximately 8.66% compared to PANW's roughly 1.7%.
- Fortinet trades at a lower trailing price-to-earnings (PE) ratio of 35.66 versus Palo Alto Networks' 101.17, suggesting a more attractive valuation.
- Both companies highlight rising AI-enabled cyber threats in recent reports, boosting sector relevance amid evolving risks.
- FTNT approaches Q1 earnings on May 6, 2026, with analysts forecasting EPS (earnings per share) of $0.61 and revenue of $1.73 billion.
- Palo Alto Networks focuses on AI security through acquisitions like Portkey, emphasizing platform expansion.
- Market caps differ significantly: Fortinet at $63.2 billion versus Palo Alto's $146.9 billion, impacting scale and growth dynamics.
Introduction
Fortinet (FTNT) and Palo Alto Networks (PANW) stand as pivotal players in the cybersecurity sector, specializing in network security solutions amid escalating global threats. This comparison analyzes their recent market performance, business strategies, and positioning, aiding investors and traders evaluating exposure to cybersecurity amid AI-driven risks and enterprise demand. With both stocks navigating volatile tech sentiment in recent weeks, understanding relative strengths in valuation, momentum, and catalysts proves essential for portfolio decisions in this high-growth industry.
FTNT Overview and Recent Performance
Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) delivers integrated cybersecurity and networking solutions, emphasizing firewalls and secure access service edge (SASE) platforms. In recent market activity, shares closed at $86.29, up 2.35%, within a 52-week range of $70.12 to $109.33. YTD performance stands at 8.66%, reflecting resilience amid broader sector pressures. Key influences include the 2026 Global Threat Landscape Report, revealing a 389% year-over-year surge in ransomware victims linked to AI-enabled cybercrime, alongside reports of stalling cybersecurity hiring. Analyst consensus holds a neutral rating with an average price target of $89.43, ahead of Q1 earnings on May 6. Sentiment benefits from Fortinet's focus on converging networking and security, supporting steady billings growth.
PANW Overview and Recent Performance
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) provides comprehensive platform-based cybersecurity, including next-generation firewalls and cloud security. Shares recently closed at $181.09, gaining 0.99%, trading between $139.57 and $223.61 over 52 weeks. YTD returns approximate 1.69%, trailing peers amid valuation scrutiny. Recent developments feature the Portkey acquisition to secure AI agents and partnerships like Armadin for autonomous attack validation, underscoring AI defense priorities. Fiscal Q3 earnings are slated for June 2, with analysts maintaining buy ratings and an average target of $206.14. Performance reflects platform stickiness but pressure from elevated multiples in recent weeks.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates 25 top-performing AI trading bots from a library of 351, selected for suitability in current market conditions. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend trading, TP/SL (take-profit/stop-loss) corridors, and multi-agent systems across timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Performance highlights include annualized returns ranging from +23.53% to +163.10%, win rates of 51.30% to 88.33%, and average trades per day from 1.51 to 11.70, targeting sectors such as semiconductors, industrials, and ETFs. While none currently feature FTNT or PANW explicitly, the platform's real-time signals and risk management appeal to traders seeking automated edges. Explore these bots to align with your strategy.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Fortinet and Palo Alto Networks both anchor the cybersecurity space with firewall leadership, but diverge in scale and approach: FTNT's integrated networking-security fabric targets efficiency for mid-market and enterprises, while PANW emphasizes expansive platforms for cloud-native environments. Growth drivers contrast with PANW's higher revenue scale ($9.89B TTM) versus FTNT's disciplined execution. Recent momentum favors FTNT's YTD edge and lower beta (0.92 vs. 0.77), indicating relative stability. Risk factors include sector-wide AI threat inflation and hiring gaps, though PANW's acquisition spree adds integration uncertainties. Market sentiment tilts toward FTNT's valuation appeal amid cybersecurity consolidation trade-offs.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI currently leans toward FTNT based on superior YTD trend consistency, more favorable valuation metrics, and near-term catalysts like impending earnings. While PANW offers robust AI security positioning, FTNT's relative stability and momentum provide a probabilistic edge in the prevailing cybersecurity landscape.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FTNT is a Hold and PANW is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FTNT’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePANW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FTNT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- PANW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FTNT’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PANW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FTNT’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PANW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FTNT (@Computer Communications) experienced а +26.63% price change this week, while PANW (@Computer Communications) price change was +17.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.28%.
Reported Earning Dates
FTNT is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
PANW is expected to report earnings on Jun 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+0.24% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| FTNT | PANW | FTNT / PANW | |
| Capitalization | 83.4B | 175B | 48% |
| EBITDA | 2.6B | 2.22B | 117% |
| Gain YTD | 43.395 | 17.047 | 255% |
| P/E Ratio | 44.14 | 119.78 | 37% |
| Revenue | 7.11B | 9.89B | 72% |
| Total Cash | 3.3B | 4.54B | 73% |
| Total Debt | 497M | 372M | 134% |
FTNT | PANW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 12 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 17 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PANW's Valuation (87) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as FTNT (90). This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to FTNT’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as FTNT (27). This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to FTNT’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's SMR Rating (12) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PANW (52). This means that FTNT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PANW’s over the last 12 months.
FTNT's Price Growth Rating (12) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as PANW (17). This means that FTNT’s stock grew similarly to PANW’s over the last 12 months.
PANW's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as FTNT (42). This means that PANW’s stock grew similarly to FTNT’s over the last 12 months.
| FTNT | PANW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 63% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 70% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FTAG | 30.23 | 0.13 | +0.44% |
| First Trust Indxx Global Agriculture ETF | |||
| HAPS | 34.10 | N/A | N/A |
| Harbor Human Capital Factor US Sm CapETF | |||
| SPDW | 49.80 | -0.61 | -1.21% |
| State Street® SPDR® Ptf Dev Wld exUS ETF | |||
| IETC | 105.93 | -1.34 | -1.25% |
| iShares U.S. Tech Independence Fcs ETF | |||
| BITW | 52.08 | -0.90 | -1.70% |
| Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF | |||
FTNT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FTNT has been loosely correlated with SHOP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FTNT jumps, then SHOP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FTNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTNT | 100% | -1.36% | ||
| SHOP - FTNT | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.63% | ||
| DT - FTNT | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.54% | ||
| PANW - FTNT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
| CRWD - FTNT | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| CRM - FTNT | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.48% | ||
More | ||||