Advertisement
CRWD vs NOW
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) vs. ServiceNow (NOW) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CRWD has demonstrated resilience in recent market activity with AI-driven cybersecurity enhancements, contrasting NOW's post-earnings dip despite strong year-to-date (YTD) gains.
- Both stocks exhibit high valuations, with CRWD's forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio around 94 and NOW's trailing P/E at 54, reflecting growth expectations in software sectors.
- Recent partnerships bolster CRWD's platform, while NOW benefits from AI agent collaborations amid competitive pressures.
- Analyst consensus leans toward strong buy for both, with average price targets suggesting upside potential from current levels.
- CRWD YTD return stands at approximately 3%, trailing NOW's 40% amid broader tech recovery.
Introduction
CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) and ServiceNow (NOW) represent leading players in the enterprise software landscape, with CRWD specializing in cloud-native cybersecurity and NOW focusing on digital workflow automation. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for growth-oriented investors and traders navigating AI-infused tech sectors, where cybersecurity threats and operational efficiency drive demand. Recent market volatility highlights their relative performance, offering insights into momentum, valuation trade-offs, and positioning amid evolving enterprise needs.
CRWD Overview and Recent Performance
CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) is a cybersecurity firm delivering endpoint protection via its Falcon platform, emphasizing AI-powered threat detection and response. In recent weeks, the stock has shown volatility, trading around $456 with a market cap exceeding $115 billion. Following strong Q4 fiscal 2026 earnings in early March—revenue of $1.31 billion and earnings per share (EPS) of $1.12—the shares initially surged over 9%, but faced pullbacks amid broader sector pressures. Sentiment has improved with AI integrations like Claude Opus and partnerships (e.g., Armadin, Dicker Data), countering concerns over AI-driven threats. YTD performance hovers near 3%, with a 52-week range of $343–$567, reflecting robust demand for cybersecurity amid rising incidents.
NOW Overview and Recent Performance
ServiceNow (NOW) provides a cloud-based platform for automating enterprise workflows across IT, HR, and customer service, increasingly incorporating AI agents. Shares recently closed near $91 (post-5-for-1 split in December 2025), with a $94 billion market cap. Q1 2026 results on April 22 showed subscription revenue up 22% to $3.67 billion and EPS of $0.97 (beating estimates), yet the stock dropped 14% due to guidance concerns and external factors like geopolitical tensions impacting subscriptions. Recent gains of over 3% in a session highlight recovery potential, supported by collaborations like Cohesity for AI data management. YTD returns exceed 40%, though monthly declines of 13% underscore valuation sensitivity in a competitive SaaS environment.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots curated from over 351 available models that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots feature impressive stats, including annualized returns ranging from 30% to 163%, win rates of 50–88%, and profit factors up to 7, tailored to sectors like semiconductors, data centers, and volatility plays with timeframes from minutes to weeks. Employing virtual agents, multi-agents, trend trading, and take-profit/stop-loss corridors, they adapt to current conditions for risk-managed copy trading. Explore these high-performing options to align with your strategy.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CRWD’s subscription-based cybersecurity model contrasts NOW’s SaaS platform for workflow orchestration, both leveraging AI for differentiation. Growth drivers include CRWD’s expanding Falcon modules amid cyber threats versus NOW’s AI agent adoption in enterprises. Recent momentum favors NOW YTD, but CRWD shows steadier analyst upgrades. Risk factors encompass high valuations (both P/E over 50), competition (e.g., Palo Alto for CRWD, Salesforce for NOW), and macro sensitivity. Sector exposure ties both to tech, with CRWD more defensive on security needs and NOW cyclical on IT spending. Market sentiment remains bullish, though CRWD edges on trend consistency.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward CRWD due to consistent cybersecurity tailwinds, recent AI platform advancements, and relative stability versus NOW’s earnings volatility. Observable trends suggest higher probability of near-term outperformance for CRWD amid persistent threats and partnerships, positioning it favorably in the current environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWD is a Hold and NOW is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNOW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRWD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRWD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NOW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а +20.19% price change this week, while NOW (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.25% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.50%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.85%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Jun 03, 2026.
NOW is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-1.19% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (-3.84% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRWD | NOW | CRWD / NOW | |
| Capitalization | 143B | 89.8B | 159% |
| EBITDA | 182M | 3.24B | 6% |
| Gain YTD | 20.012 | -43.175 | -46% |
| P/E Ratio | 765.02 | 51.82 | 1,476% |
| Revenue | 4.81B | 14B | 34% |
| Total Cash | 5.23B | 5.18B | 101% |
| Total Debt | 820M | 2.43B | 34% |
CRWD | NOW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 29 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 76 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NOW's Valuation (76) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that NOW’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NOW (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew significantly faster than NOW’s over the last 12 months.
NOW's SMR Rating (53) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CRWD (92) in the null industry. This means that NOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as NOW (64) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to NOW’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as NOW (97) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to NOW’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | NOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 68% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 10 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 4 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 81% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSLC | 140.55 | 0.76 | +0.54% |
| Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US LgCp Eq ETF | |||
| HFMF | 22.97 | 0.06 | +0.26% |
| Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF | |||
| SPAQ | 92.07 | N/A | N/A |
| Horizon Kinetics SPAC Active ETF | |||
| IAF | 12.87 | -0.06 | -0.46% |
| abrdn Australia Equity Fund | |||
| FXR | 85.35 | -0.70 | -0.81% |
| First Trust Indtls/PrdcrDurbAlphaDEX®ETF | |||
CRWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 100% | +3.00% | ||
| ZS - CRWD | 74% Closely correlated | +4.28% | ||
| PANW - CRWD | 72% Closely correlated | +5.65% | ||
| NOW - CRWD | 68% Closely correlated | -2.19% | ||
| HUBS - CRWD | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| ADSK - CRWD | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.63% | ||
More | ||||