Advertisement
CRWD vs NOW
Which Stock Would AI Choose? CrowdStrike Holdings (CRWD) vs. ServiceNow (NOW) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CRWD has delivered substantially stronger year-to-date and trailing twelve-month returns compared with NOW, reflecting robust demand for its cybersecurity platform.
- NOW reported second-quarter results that exceeded estimates in July but provided guidance viewed as slightly cautious, contributing to relative underperformance versus the broader market.
- Both companies operate in high-growth technology segments—cybersecurity for CRWD and enterprise workflow automation with expanding AI and security capabilities for NOW—yet exhibit distinct risk-return profiles amid elevated valuations in the sector.
- Recent market activity shows CRWD approaching its fiscal second-quarter earnings release with notable pre-announcement volatility, while NOW has seen analyst price-target upgrades supporting sentiment recovery.
- Sector exposure differs meaningfully: CRWD benefits from platform consolidation in security, whereas NOW leverages recurring subscription revenue in IT service management and emerging autonomous security offerings.
Introduction
This comparison examines CRWD and NOW to provide traders and investors with a clear view of their relative positioning in the current market environment. CrowdStrike Holdings delivers cloud-native cybersecurity solutions, while ServiceNow provides cloud-based platforms for digital workflow automation. The analysis focuses on verifiable recent performance, business fundamentals, and observable sentiment shifts, offering insights relevant to growth-oriented equity investors and those evaluating technology-sector exposure without reliance on forward-looking speculation.
CRWD Overview and Recent Performance
CrowdStrike Holdings develops the Falcon platform, a cloud-delivered endpoint protection and security analytics solution used by enterprises worldwide. In recent market activity, the stock has posted strong gains, with year-to-date returns exceeding 60 percent and one-year returns surpassing 85 percent, significantly outpacing the S&P 500. The company has expanded its module count to 33, supporting platform adoption, and maintains focus on artificial-intelligence-enhanced threat detection. Pre-earnings positioning ahead of the fiscal second-quarter report has introduced volatility, with the shares reaching a 52-week high near $227 before moderating. Sentiment remains supported by consistent demand for cybersecurity infrastructure amid ongoing digital transformation trends.
NOW Overview and Recent Performance
ServiceNow operates a cloud platform that automates IT service management, workflow processes, and increasingly incorporates security and artificial-intelligence capabilities. Recent results for the second quarter showed revenue growth of 24 percent year-over-year and earnings per share above consensus estimates. However, the stock has lagged broader indices, with year-to-date returns around 16 percent. Analyst commentary following the July earnings release included several upward price-target revisions. The company continues to emphasize recurring subscription revenue and expansion into autonomous security offerings, though investor caution around guidance contributed to muted price response in the near term.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron maintains a curated section of Trending AI Robots drawn from hundreds of available AI trading bots that execute strategies across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions receive placement in this highlighted area. Available bots span a wide range of performance metrics, with historical win rates typically between 55 percent and 75 percent depending on strategy, timeframes from intraday to multi-week, and varying risk parameters. Each bot employs distinct approaches, including momentum, mean-reversion, and pattern-recognition methodologies, applied to different ticker universes. Users interested in exploring these options can review detailed statistics directly on the platform. Visit Trending AI Robots for current selections.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CrowdStrike Holdings and ServiceNow differ in core business models: CRWD centers on cybersecurity platform consolidation, while NOW focuses on enterprise workflow and IT operations with growing emphasis on security modules. Growth drivers for CRWD include rising module adoption and AI integration in threat response; NOW benefits from subscription expansion and AI-driven automation. Recent momentum favors CRWD, which has outperformed NOW by wide margins over the past year. Risk factors include high forward valuations for both, with CRWD exhibiting greater earnings volatility around reporting periods and NOW facing sensitivity to guidance perceptions. Sector exposure places CRWD squarely in cybersecurity and NOW in broader enterprise software, influencing relative sensitivity to macroeconomic and regulatory developments.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a higher probability of favorable near-term behavior to CRWD than to NOW, reflecting stronger recent momentum and platform expansion metrics. This assessment remains probabilistic and subject to shifts in market conditions or incoming data such as earnings outcomes.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWD is a Buy and NOW is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CRWD’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNOW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CRWD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NOW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CRWD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CRWD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- NOW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CRWD (@Computer Communications) experienced а -2.43% price change this week, while NOW (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -1.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.21%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.47%.
Reported Earning Dates
CRWD is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2026.
NOW is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (-1.84% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
@Packaged Software (-3.96% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CRWD | NOW | CRWD / NOW | |
| Capitalization | 218B | 146B | 149% |
| EBITDA | 423M | 3.5B | 12% |
| Gain YTD | 81.841 | -7.788 | -1,051% |
| P/E Ratio | 5682.67 | 88.29 | 6,437% |
| Revenue | 5.4B | 14.7B | 37% |
| Total Cash | 5.01B | 4.66B | 108% |
| Total Debt | 820M | 8.45B | 10% |
CRWD | NOW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 88 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NOW's Valuation (81) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CRWD (100) in the null industry. This means that NOW’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NOW (88) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew significantly faster than NOW’s over the last 12 months.
NOW's SMR Rating (58) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CRWD (89) in the null industry. This means that NOW’s stock grew similarly to CRWD’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as NOW (42) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew similarly to NOW’s over the last 12 months.
CRWD's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NOW (72) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CRWD’s stock grew somewhat faster than NOW’s over the last 12 months.
| CRWD | NOW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
CRWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRWD has been closely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRWD jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRWD | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| PANW - CRWD | 82% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| OKTA - CRWD | 75% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| FTNT - CRWD | 71% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| TENB - CRWD | 68% Closely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| NOW - CRWD | 68% Closely correlated | -2.97% | ||
More | ||||
NOW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOW has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NOW jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOW | 100% | -2.97% | ||
| CRM - NOW | 78% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| HUBS - NOW | 71% Closely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| SAP - NOW | 70% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| ASAN - NOW | 69% Closely correlated | -12.69% | ||
| CRWD - NOW | 68% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
More | ||||