CRWS
Price
$3.90
Change
-$0.06 (-1.52%)
Updated
Mar 11 closing price
Capitalization
54.58M
NTZ
Price
$4.57
Change
-$0.19 (-3.99%)
Updated
Mar 11 closing price
Capitalization
68.84M
Ad is loading...

CRWS vs NTZ

Header iconCRWS vs NTZ Comparison
Open Charts CRWS vs NTZBanner chart's image
Crown Crafts
Price$3.90
Change-$0.06 (-1.52%)
Volume$14.97K
Capitalization54.58M
Natuzzi SpA
Price$4.57
Change-$0.19 (-3.99%)
Volume$3.65K
Capitalization68.84M
CRWS vs NTZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
CRWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CRWS vs. NTZ commentary
Mar 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CRWS is a Hold and NTZ is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CRWS: $3.90 vs. NTZ: $4.57)
Brand notoriety: CRWS and NTZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Home Furnishings industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CRWS: 96% vs. NTZ: 37%
Market capitalization -- CRWS: $54.58M vs. NTZ: $68.84M
CRWS [@Home Furnishings] is valued at $54.58M. NTZ’s [@Home Furnishings] market capitalization is $68.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Furnishings] industry ranges from $30.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Furnishings] industry is $2.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CRWS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CRWS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRWS is a better buy in the long-term than NTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CRWS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CRWS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CRWS (@Home Furnishings) experienced а +0.26% price change this week, while NTZ (@Home Furnishings) price change was -7.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was -2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRWS is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Furnishings (-2.61% weekly)

The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTZ($68.8M) has a higher market cap than CRWS($54.6M). CRWS has higher P/E ratio than NTZ: CRWS (11.59) vs NTZ (7.05). NTZ YTD gains are higher at: -4.792 vs. CRWS (-13.138). CRWS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.9M vs. NTZ (5.34M). NTZ has more cash in the bank: 53.5M vs. CRWS (683K). CRWS has less debt than NTZ: CRWS (26.6M) vs NTZ (111M). NTZ has higher revenues than CRWS: NTZ (436M) vs CRWS (86.7M).
CRWSNTZCRWS / NTZ
Capitalization54.6M68.8M79%
EBITDA11.9M5.34M223%
Gain YTD-13.138-4.792274%
P/E Ratio11.597.05164%
Revenue86.7M436M20%
Total Cash683K53.5M1%
Total Debt26.6M111M24%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CRWS vs NTZ: Fundamental Ratings
CRWS
NTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5223
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
7692
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7853
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1699
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRWS's Valuation (5) in the Home Furnishings industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NTZ (64). This means that CRWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NTZ’s over the last 12 months.

NTZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as CRWS (100). This means that NTZ’s stock grew similarly to CRWS’s over the last 12 months.

CRWS's SMR Rating (76) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as NTZ (92). This means that CRWS’s stock grew similarly to NTZ’s over the last 12 months.

NTZ's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as CRWS (78). This means that NTZ’s stock grew similarly to CRWS’s over the last 12 months.

CRWS's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Home Furnishings industry is significantly better than the same rating for NTZ (99). This means that CRWS’s stock grew significantly faster than NTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CRWS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CRWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FFIC12.86-0.17
-1.30%
Flushing Financial Corp
ARI9.79-0.17
-1.71%
Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance
WHR91.92-2.70
-2.85%
Whirlpool Corp
ADP292.44-10.55
-3.48%
Automatic Data Processing
CNTX0.70-0.06
-8.16%
Context Therapeutics

CRWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRWS and NTZ have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRWS and NTZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRWS
1D Price
Change %
CRWS100%
-1.51%
NTZ - CRWS
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.93%
ETD - CRWS
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
LCUT - CRWS
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
HOFT - CRWS
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
MBC - CRWS
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
More

NTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NTZ and CRWS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NTZ and CRWS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NTZ
1D Price
Change %
NTZ100%
-3.93%
CRWS - NTZ
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
MLKN - NTZ
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
WHR - NTZ
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.85%
HOFT - NTZ
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.79%
LZB - NTZ
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
More