It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSAN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCTXAY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSAN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CTXAY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CSAN (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а -3.44% price change this week, while CTXAY (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was -2.99% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.47%.
CSAN is expected to report earnings on Feb 14, 2025.
CTXAY is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.
The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.
CSAN | CTXAY | CSAN / CTXAY | |
Capitalization | 6.02B | 5.25B | 115% |
EBITDA | 13.6B | 1.49B | 912% |
Gain YTD | -47.988 | -20.273 | 237% |
P/E Ratio | 24.94 | 10.79 | 231% |
Revenue | 40.6B | 38.2B | 106% |
Total Cash | 19.7B | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 62.3B | N/A | - |
CSAN | CTXAY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago75% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago69% | 3 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago59% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago59% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago58% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago60% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 3 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago63% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | 3 days ago62% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSAN has been closely correlated with UGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CSAN jumps, then UGP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CSAN | 100% | +1.03% | ||
UGP - CSAN | 68% Closely correlated | +0.89% | ||
CLNE - CSAN | 39% Loosely correlated | -7.34% | ||
CTXAY - CSAN | 27% Poorly correlated | -0.64% | ||
AMTX - CSAN | 26% Poorly correlated | -5.90% | ||
BPT - CSAN | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.71% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CTXAY and CLNE have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTXAY and CLNE's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTXAY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CTXAY | 100% | -0.64% | ||
CLNE - CTXAY | 27% Poorly correlated | -7.34% | ||
CSAN - CTXAY | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
UGP - CTXAY | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
AMTX - CTXAY | 26% Poorly correlated | -5.90% | ||
DKL - CTXAY | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.46% | ||
More |