Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSFZX vs IRGTX
CSFZX vs IRGTX Comparison
Open Charts CSFZX vs IRGTX
CSFZX vs IRGTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSFZX vs. IRGTX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSFZX is a Hold and IRGTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.28B vs. IRGTX (109M). IRGTX pays higher dividends than CSFZX: IRGTX (5.71) vs CSFZX (3.24). CSFZX was incepted earlier than IRGTX: CSFZX (12 years) vs IRGTX (20 years). IRGTX (1.37) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). IRGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. CSFZX (57.00). CSFZX (0) and IRGTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.47 vs. IRGTX (8.30). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 8.40 vs. IRGTX (0.88).
| CSFZX | IRGTX | CSFZX / IRGTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.16 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.37 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.304 | 7.111 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.28B | 109M | 2,094% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 5.71 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.47 | 8.30 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.09 | 29.06 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.40 | 0.88 | 955% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.26 | 27.37 | 216% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement