MRT
Price
$1.85
Change
+$0.10 (+5.71%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
159M
67 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAR
Price
$16.95
Change
+$0.10 (+0.59%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
699.12M
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MRT vs PAR

MRT vs PAR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MRT vs. PAR commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MRT is a StrongBuy and PAR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (MRT: $1.85 vs. PAR: $16.95)
Brand notoriety: MRT and PAR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MRT: 47% vs. PAR: 157%
Market capitalization -- MRT: $159M vs. PAR: $699.12M
MRT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $159M. PAR’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $699.12M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $400.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MRT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • MRT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PAR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRT is a better buy in the long-term than PAR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MRT’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MRT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PAR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MRT is a better buy in the short-term than PAR.

Price Growth

MRT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.76% price change this week, while PAR (@Packaged Software) price change was +9.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

MRT is expected to report earnings on Oct 09, 2026.

PAR is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.35% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAR($699M) has a higher market cap than MRT($159M). MRT YTD gains are higher at: -21.941 vs. PAR (-53.280).
MRTPARMRT / PAR
Capitalization159M699M23%
EBITDAN/A-17.58M-
Gain YTD-21.941-53.28041%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A476M-
Total CashN/A77.8M-
Total DebtN/A434M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MRT vs PAR: Fundamental Ratings
MRT
PAR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2181
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4863
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10049
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5031

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRT's Valuation (8) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for PAR (83) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew significantly faster than PAR’s over the last 12 months.

MRT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PAR (100) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew similarly to PAR’s over the last 12 months.

PAR's SMR Rating (95) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is in the same range as MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PAR’s stock grew similarly to MRT’s over the last 12 months.

MRT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as PAR (63) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry. This means that MRT’s stock grew similarly to PAR’s over the last 12 months.

PAR's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Computer Processing Hardware industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MRT (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that PAR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MRT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MRTPAR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MRT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LDFVX17.690.03
+0.17%
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity A
RDVIX2.63N/A
N/A
Royce Smid-Cap Total Return Investment
BROAX24.65-0.16
-0.64%
BlackRock Advantage International Inv A
ERHSX14.60-0.17
-1.15%
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sci R
MSSMX10.76-0.13
-1.19%
Morgan Stanley Inst Inception A

MRT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRT has been loosely correlated with CYN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRT jumps, then CYN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRT
1D Price
Change %
MRT100%
+5.71%
CYN - MRT
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.75%
HCAT - MRT
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
PAR - MRT
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
PDFS - MRT
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
DCBO - MRT
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
More