Ad is loading...
CSHAX vs SMFPX
CSHAX vs SMFPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHAX vs. SMFPX commentary
Dec 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHAX is a Hold and SMFPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.21B vs. CSHAX (1.04B). CSHAX pays higher dividends than SMFPX: CSHAX (7.88) vs SMFPX (4.75). CSHAX was incepted earlier than SMFPX: CSHAX (14 years) vs SMFPX (12 years). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. CSHAX (20.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHAX: SMFPX (1000) vs CSHAX (15000). CSHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.60 vs. SMFPX (37.02). SMFPX return over 5 years is better than : 80.93 vs. CSHAX (74.80).
| CSHAX | SMFPX | CSHAX / SMFPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 40.423 | 35.105 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 1000 | 1,500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 1.21B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.88 | 4.75 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 41.60 | 37.02 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 106.56 | 81.97 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.80 | 80.93 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.40 | 22.14 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...