Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs HMSFX
CSHNX vs HMSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSFX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and HMSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. HMSFX (73.7M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSFX (9.13) vs CSHNX (7.05). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSFX: CSHNX (11 years) vs HMSFX (12 years). HMSFX (1.94) is less costly to investors than CSHNX (1.49). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. HMSFX (6.00). CSHNX (2500) and HMSFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.60 vs. HMSFX (-3.79). HMSFX (203.58) and CSHNX (193.75) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CSHNX | HMSFX | CSHNX / HMSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.75 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.94 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.511 | -1.637 | -92% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 73.7M | 1,415% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 9.13 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.60 | -3.79 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.00 | 63.05 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 193.75 | 203.58 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.47 | 95.75 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement