Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs HMSFX
CSHNX vs HMSFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSFX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and HMSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. HMSFX (85.1M). HMSFX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSFX (9.01) vs CSHNX (7.86). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSFX: CSHNX (11 years) vs HMSFX (11 years). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. HMSFX (16.00). CSHNX (2500) and HMSFX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.33 vs. HMSFX (48.47). HMSFX return over 5 years is better than : 113.81 vs. CSHNX (85.63).
| CSHNX | HMSFX | CSHNX / HMSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.545 | 8.754 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 85.1M | 1,371% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.86 | 9.01 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.33 | 48.47 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.90 | 114.10 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.63 | 113.81 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.46 | 59.61 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...