Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs HMSIX
CSHNX vs HMSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSIX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and HMSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. HMSIX (85.1M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSIX (8.63) vs CSHNX (7.86). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSIX: CSHNX (11 years) vs HMSIX (11 years). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. HMSIX (16.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: CSHNX (2500) vs HMSIX (250000). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.33 vs. HMSIX (49.30). HMSIX return over 5 years is better than : 117.12 vs. CSHNX (85.63).
| CSHNX | HMSIX | CSHNX / HMSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.545 | 9.098 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.17B | 85.1M | 1,371% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.86 | 8.63 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.33 | 49.30 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 104.90 | 116.32 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 85.63 | 117.12 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.46 | 64.16 | 54% |