Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs HMSIX
CSHNX vs HMSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSIX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and HMSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. HMSIX (73.9M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSIX (8.66) vs CSHNX (7.05). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSIX: CSHNX (11 years) vs HMSIX (12 years). HMSIX (1.54) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. HMSIX (6.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: CSHNX (2500) vs HMSIX (250000). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.65 vs. HMSIX (-2.40). HMSIX return over 5 years is better than : 203.70 vs. CSHNX (193.62).
| CSHNX | HMSIX | CSHNX / HMSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.50 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.54 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.159 | -1.404 | -154% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 73.9M | 1,411% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 8.66 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.65 | -2.40 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.98 | 62.13 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 193.62 | 203.70 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.73 | 99.47 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement