Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs HMSIX
CSHNX vs HMSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSIX commentary
Sep 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and HMSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. HMSIX (77.2M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSIX (8.08) vs CSHNX (6.64). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSIX: CSHNX (11 years) vs HMSIX (12 years). HMSIX (1.54) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. HMSIX (6.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: CSHNX (2500) vs HMSIX (250000). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.56 vs. HMSIX (12.32). HMSIX return over 5 years is better than : 280.43 vs. CSHNX (247.47).
| CSHNX | HMSIX | CSHNX / HMSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.50 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.54 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.477 | 0.111 | 4,045% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 77.2M | 1,437% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.64 | 8.08 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.56 | 12.32 | 134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.36 | 89.03 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 247.47 | 280.43 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.19 | 92.92 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement