Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs HMSIX
CSHNX vs HMSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. HMSIX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Buy and HMSIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.1B vs. HMSIX (78.6M). HMSIX pays higher dividends than CSHNX: HMSIX (7.80) vs CSHNX (6.79). CSHNX was incepted earlier than HMSIX: CSHNX (11 years) vs HMSIX (11 years). HMSIX (1.54) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. HMSIX (6.00). CSHNX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMSIX: CSHNX (2500) vs HMSIX (250000). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.90 vs. HMSIX (19.49). HMSIX return over 5 years is better than : 205.08 vs. CSHNX (180.78).
| CSHNX | HMSIX | CSHNX / HMSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.50 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.54 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.662 | 0.040 | 9,245% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 78.6M | 1,402% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.79 | 7.80 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.90 | 19.49 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.49 | 84.01 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 180.78 | 205.08 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.87 | 45.35 | 55% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers