Ad is loading...
CSHNX vs TMLAX
CSHNX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. TMLAX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.16B vs. TMLAX (141M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than TMLAX: CSHNX (7.86) vs TMLAX (6.55). CSHNX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs TMLAX (12 years). CSHNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. TMLAX (15.00). TMLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: TMLAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). CSHNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.45 vs. TMLAX (52.47). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 94.69 vs. TMLAX (70.60).
| CSHNX | TMLAX | CSHNX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.370 | 8.077 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.16B | 141M | 823% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.86 | 6.55 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.45 | 52.47 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 113.21 | 61.59 | 184% |
| Returns for 5 years | 94.69 | 70.60 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.54 | 19.17 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers