Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CSHNX vs TMLAX
CSHNX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CSHNX vs. TMLAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSHNX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSHNX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. TMLAX (123M). CSHNX pays higher dividends than TMLAX: CSHNX (7.05) vs TMLAX (4.09). CSHNX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: CSHNX (11 years) vs TMLAX (13 years). TMLAX (1.56) and CSHNX (1.49) have similar cost to investors . TMLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. CSHNX (25.00). TMLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CSHNX (5%) vs CSHNX (5%). TMLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CSHNX: TMLAX (1000) vs CSHNX (2500). TMLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.90 vs. CSHNX (-1.82). CSHNX return over 5 years is better than : 195.35 vs. TMLAX (100.50).
| CSHNX | TMLAX | CSHNX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.56 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.49 | 1.56 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.066 | 2.584 | 80% |
| Front Load | 5% | 6% | 91% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 123M | 849% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.05 | 4.09 | 172% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.82 | -0.90 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.84 | 40.52 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 195.35 | 100.50 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.58 | 64.32 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement