Advertisement
CSIQ vs FSLR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSIQ is a StrongBuy and FSLR is a Hold.
| CSIQ | FSLR | CSIQ / FSLR | |
| Capitalization | 866M | 22.5B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 24.1M | 2.44B | 1% |
| Gain YTD | -46.319 | -19.982 | 232% |
| P/E Ratio | 20.09 | 12.89 | 156% |
| Revenue | 4.99B | 5.38B | 93% |
| Total Cash | 1.46B | 1.73B | 85% |
| Total Debt | 7.97B | 194M | 4,109% |
CSIQ | FSLR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 63 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CSIQ's Valuation (52) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as FSLR (75) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that CSIQ’s stock grew similarly to FSLR’s over the last 12 months.
FSLR's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSIQ (100) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FSLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSIQ’s over the last 12 months.
FSLR's SMR Rating (49) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSIQ (93) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FSLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSIQ’s over the last 12 months.
FSLR's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CSIQ (64) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FSLR’s stock grew similarly to CSIQ’s over the last 12 months.
CSIQ's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Electrical Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSLR (74) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that CSIQ’s stock grew significantly faster than FSLR’s over the last 12 months.
| CSIQ | FSLR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 12 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSIQ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while FSLR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CSIQ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FSLR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSIQ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSLR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSIQ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- FSLR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
CSIQ (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а -3.48% price change this week, while FSLR (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was +2.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -15.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -30.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSIQ is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
FSLR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Alternative Power Generation (-0.80% weekly)The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.
Advertisement
CSIQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSIQ has been loosely correlated with JKS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSIQ jumps, then JKS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CSIQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSIQ | 100% | -2.07% | ||
| JKS - CSIQ | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| FCEL - CSIQ | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| BE - CSIQ | 50% Loosely correlated | +6.68% | ||
| FSLR - CSIQ | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| PLUG - CSIQ | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
More | ||||
FSLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSLR has been loosely correlated with BE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSLR jumps, then BE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSLR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSLR | 100% | +0.90% | ||
| BE - FSLR | 55% Loosely correlated | +6.68% | ||
| NXT - FSLR | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| FCEL - FSLR | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| CSIQ - FSLR | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| SHLS - FSLR | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.67% | ||
More | ||||