CSL
Price
$340.49
Change
+$4.45 (+1.32%)
Updated
Jul 27, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.6B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LPX
Price
$74.24
Change
-$0.24 (-0.32%)
Updated
Jul 27, 01:39 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.2B
9 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CSL vs LPX

CSL vs LPX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSL vs. LPX commentary
Jul 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSL is a StrongBuy and LPX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2026
Stock price -- (CSL: $336.04 vs. LPX: $74.48)
Brand notoriety: CSL and LPX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSL: 68% vs. LPX: 64%
Market capitalization -- CSL: $13.6B vs. LPX: $5.2B
CSL [@Building Products] is valued at $13.6B. LPX’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $5.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $106.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $11.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLPX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CSL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LPX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the long-term than LPX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LPX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LPX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSL is a better buy in the short-term than LPX.

Price Growth

CSL (@Building Products) experienced а -2.71% price change this week, while LPX (@Building Products) price change was +0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSL is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

LPX is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-0.26% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSL($13.6B) has a higher market cap than LPX($5.2B). LPX has higher P/E ratio than CSL: LPX (63.66) vs CSL (19.62). CSL YTD gains are higher at: 5.693 vs. LPX (-7.047). CSL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.23B vs. LPX (278M). CSL has more cash in the bank: 771M vs. LPX (164M). LPX has less debt than CSL: LPX (378M) vs CSL (2.88B). CSL has higher revenues than LPX: CSL (4.98B) vs LPX (2.56B).
CSLLPXCSL / LPX
Capitalization13.6B5.2B261%
EBITDA1.23B278M441%
Gain YTD5.693-7.047-81%
P/E Ratio19.6263.6631%
Revenue4.98B2.56B195%
Total Cash771M164M470%
Total Debt2.88B378M763%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSL vs LPX: Fundamental Ratings
CSL
LPX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1874
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
61
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5376
SMR RATING
1..100
2586
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7170
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
695
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSL's Valuation (20) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LPX (61) in the Forest Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LPX’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as LPX (76) in the Forest Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew similarly to LPX’s over the last 12 months.

CSL's SMR Rating (25) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LPX (86) in the Forest Products industry. This means that CSL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LPX’s over the last 12 months.

LPX's Price Growth Rating (70) in the Forest Products industry is in the same range as CSL (71) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that LPX’s stock grew similarly to CSL’s over the last 12 months.

LPX's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Forest Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSL (69) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that LPX’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSLLPX
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CSL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LPX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PNFP102.602.79
+2.80%
Pinnacle Financial Partners Inc
HUYA2.36-0.04
-1.67%
HUYA
MDIA1.00-0.02
-1.96%
Mediaco Holding
PLBL7.55-0.23
-2.90%
Polibeli Group Ltd
ELPW0.19-0.03
-15.15%
Elong Power Holding Limited

CSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSL has been loosely correlated with BLDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSL jumps, then BLDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSL
1D Price
Change %
CSL100%
+1.35%
BLDR - CSL
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.27%
LPX - CSL
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.24%
GFF - CSL
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
MAS - CSL
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.50%
LII - CSL
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
More

LPX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LPX has been closely correlated with BXC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LPX jumps, then BXC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LPX
1D Price
Change %
LPX100%
+3.24%
BXC - LPX
78%
Closely correlated
+1.76%
BLDR - LPX
74%
Closely correlated
+3.27%
TREX - LPX
67%
Closely correlated
+2.48%
MAS - LPX
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.50%
OC - LPX
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.44%
More