Advertisement
CSR vs IRM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Centerspace (CSR) vs. Iron Mountain (IRM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Centerspace (CSR), a residential REIT, reported Q1 2026 revenue down 3% year-over-year due to prior property sales, with Core FFO per share at $1.12, reaffirming full-year guidance amid stable occupancy.
- Iron Mountain (IRM), a data management and storage REIT, delivered record Q1 2026 revenue growth of 21.6% to $1.94 billion, driven by data centers and digital services, boosting AFFO 22%.
- IRM shows superior momentum with 60% YTD returns versus CSR's modest 3-4% YTD, reflecting stronger sector tailwinds in data infrastructure.
- Both offer attractive dividends—CSR at 4.5%, IRM at 2.6%—but IRM's lower beta-adjusted volatility and growth profile stand out in recent market activity.
- AI trading bots on Tickeron highlight opportunities in data centers, aligning with IRM's positioning amid AI-driven demand.
- Relative performance favors IRM on revenue growth, EBITDA margins, and analyst upgrades in recent weeks.
Introduction
This stock comparison between Centerspace (CSR) and Iron Mountain (IRM) examines two real estate investment trusts (REITs) navigating distinct market dynamics. CSR focuses on multifamily apartments, while IRM specializes in information management and data storage. Investors seeking income stability may eye CSR's residential exposure, whereas those pursuing growth in digital infrastructure could favor IRM. Recent earnings and sector trends provide insights into their relative performance, aiding traders in assessing momentum, valuation, and positioning in the current market environment.
CSR Overview and Recent Performance
Centerspace (CSR) is a self-managed multifamily REIT owning and operating apartment communities primarily in the upper Midwest and select markets. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $68, up modestly year-to-date by about 3.7%, with a 52-week range of $52.76 to $69.16. Q1 2026 results showed revenue of $65.1 million, down 3% year-over-year due to prior sales of 12 communities, and a net loss of $0.77 per diluted share impacted by a $9.7 million impairment on a Denver property. Core FFO per share held at $1.12, with same-store occupancy steady at 95.4% but NOI down 1.1% from higher operating costs. The company reaffirmed its 2026 Core FFO guidance of $4.81-$5.05 per share, signaling confidence despite regulatory pressures. Sentiment reflects caution on residential headwinds like elevated expenses, tempered by strong liquidity of $267 million.
IRM Overview and Recent Performance
Iron Mountain (IRM) is a global leader in storage, data management, and destruction services, with growing emphasis on data centers and digital solutions. The stock has surged around $131, boasting 60% YTD gains and 40% over one year, near its 52-week high of $131.83. Recent weeks highlighted blockbuster Q1 2026 earnings: revenue up 21.6% to $1.94 billion, net income at $149 million, Adjusted EBITDA up 22.1% to $708 million, and AFFO per share rising 22% to $1.43, all beating estimates. Growth stemmed from 47% data center revenue increase and 92% in asset lifecycle management (ALM), fueled by AI and hyperscaler demand. The firm raised its full-year outlook, prompting analyst upgrades like Truist's $140 target. Positive sentiment underscores robust organic growth—the highest in 25 years—and strategic expansion.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend trading, technical/fundamental analysis, multi-agent systems, and corridor exits (e.g., 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss), with annualized returns ranging from +23% to +169%, win rates of 51-88%, and portfolios of 1-18 tickers. Highlights include bots targeting data centers (e.g., APLD, GDS), semiconductors, and infrastructure, showcasing high win rates like 88% on leveraged ETFs. Tailored for current conditions like AI expansion, they offer virtual and brokerage agents with risk management. Traders can explore these to enhance strategies—visit Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots for real-time insights.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Centerspace (CSR) and Iron Mountain (IRM) both operate as REITs but diverge in business models: CSR’s residential apartments face cyclical rents and expenses, while IRM’s storage and data services benefit from recurring contracts and secular AI/data growth. Growth drivers contrast sharply—CSR relies on occupancy and NOI stability (95% occupancy, flat same-store revenue), versus IRM’s 17% organic revenue surge from data centers. Recent momentum favors IRM (60% YTD vs. 4% for CSR). Risk factors include CSR’s higher debt/equity (124%) and impairments amid regulatory hurdles, while IRM navigates leverage but with superior cash flows. Sector exposure positions IRM in high-demand data infrastructure versus CSR’s mature residential. Market sentiment tilts toward IRM post-earnings beats and upgrades.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI analysis currently leans toward Iron Mountain (IRM), based on superior trend consistency from 21.6% revenue growth and 60% YTD returns, alongside catalysts in data centers aligning with AI bots' focus. CSR offers stability with reaffirmed guidance and high occupancy, but trails in momentum and catalysts. Probabilistic edge to IRM for growth-oriented positioning in recent market conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSR is a Hold and IRM is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIRM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CSR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- IRM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IRM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CSR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- IRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CSR (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а +5.24% price change this week, while IRM (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was -4.17% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.17%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was +0.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.11%.
Reported Earning Dates
CSR is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
IRM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (-0.62% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
@Specialty Telecommunications (+0.29% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
| CSR | IRM | CSR / IRM | |
| Capitalization | 1.16B | 37.6B | 3% |
| EBITDA | 171M | 2.32B | 7% |
| Gain YTD | 4.647 | 53.392 | 9% |
| P/E Ratio | 146.57 | 137.18 | 107% |
| Revenue | 272M | 7.25B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 7.56M | 251M | 3% |
| Total Debt | 1.02B | 19.4B | 5% |
CSR | IRM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 23 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 100 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 80 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 14 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 45 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IRM's Valuation (98) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CSR (100). This means that IRM’s stock grew similarly to CSR’s over the last 12 months.
IRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSR (80). This means that IRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSR’s over the last 12 months.
IRM's SMR Rating (2) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSR (89). This means that IRM’s stock grew significantly faster than CSR’s over the last 12 months.
IRM's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CSR (46). This means that IRM’s stock grew similarly to CSR’s over the last 12 months.
CSR's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for IRM (88). This means that CSR’s stock grew significantly faster than IRM’s over the last 12 months.
| CSR | IRM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 56% | 15 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
CSR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSR has been loosely correlated with STAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSR jumps, then STAG could also see price increases.
IRM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IRM has been closely correlated with DLR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IRM jumps, then DLR could also see price increases.