Investors comparing CSR and IRM are weighing two income-oriented REITs that occupy opposite ends of the commercial property spectrum. Centerspace focuses on multifamily apartment communities across the Upper Midwest and Mountain states, while Iron Mountain has evolved from physical records storage into a global information management and data center platform. This stock comparison is most relevant for income-focused investors and sector-rotating traders who want to understand how relative performance, growth catalysts, and market positioning differ between a defensive residential landlord and a faster-growing digital infrastructure owner.
CSR, or Centerspace, is a real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns and operates apartment communities, with roughly 47 communities and more than 10,400 homes concentrated in Colorado, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, and Utah. As a small-cap name with a market capitalization near $1 billion, it trades with a comparatively low beta of roughly 0.87 and offers a dividend yield in the mid-single digits.
In recent market activity, CSR has traded toward the lower end of its 52-week range, reflecting softer multifamily rent growth and elevated new supply in several of its markets. The stock's relative performance has been tempered by mixed funds from operations (FFO) — a key earnings measure for REITs that adjusts for items such as depreciation — with a recent quarterly FFO figure slightly below consensus. Sentiment has also been shaped by a proposed acquisition of Centerspace by Independence Realty Trust, a deal that an activist shareholder has publicly opposed, adding uncertainty around the company's strategic direction. Analysts have issued a mix of upgrades and price-target reductions in recent weeks, leaving the consensus near a neutral "hold" with a modestly higher average target.
IRM, or Iron Mountain, is a global REIT serving more than 240,000 customers through its records and information management, digital solutions, and asset lifecycle businesses. Its data center segment has become the company's most visible growth engine, with operating capacity now exceeding 500 megawatts (MW) and leasing rates above 95%, driven largely by demand for AI and cloud infrastructure.
Recent quarters have shown strong top-line momentum, with consolidated revenue rising more than 20% year over year and data center revenue growing at a much faster pace. This has supported a sharp year-to-date advance and helped IRM maintain a premium valuation relative to many REIT peers. The growth profile carries trade-offs, however: Iron Mountain operates with a substantial debt load and rising interest expense, and its traditional physical records business faces a gradual, long-term shift toward digital storage. Still, analyst coverage remains predominantly positive, with a consensus "buy" rating and price targets above current levels.
For traders who prefer a systematic approach to relative strength and market positioning, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of the platform's most relevant automated strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those best suited to current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These bots differ in trading style, strategy, timeframe, historical performance, and the specific tickers they cover — ranging from swing and trend-following approaches to shorter-term momentum models. Investors reviewing a CSR versus IRM comparison may find it useful to explore the Trending AI Robots section to see which automated signals currently align with each name's momentum and stability profile.
From a business-model standpoint, CSR and IRM differ on scale, growth, and risk. Centerspace is a focused residential operator whose results hinge on regional apartment supply and demand, rent growth, and occupancy. Iron Mountain, by contrast, blends a mature, cash-generative records business with a fast-expanding data center arm, giving it exposure to secular digital and AI demand.
Growth drivers are a clear point of divergence. IRM has posted double-digit revenue growth and raised its full-year outlook, powered by data center leasing. CSR has shown more modest, supply-constrained growth and an FFO trajectory that has occasionally missed estimates. On valuation, CSR looks cheaper on an earnings basis and carries a higher dividend yield, while IRM trades at a substantial premium to peers, reflecting expectations for continued AI-driven expansion.
Risk profiles also contrast. Centerspace's smaller footprint and acquisition uncertainty create stock-specific risk, whereas Iron Mountain's higher leverage, interest-rate sensitivity, and rich valuation introduce financial and valuation risk. Market sentiment currently favors IRM, whose upward trend and stronger analyst consensus stand out against the more neutral positioning on CSR.
Based on observable factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor IRM in the current environment. Iron Mountain demonstrates more consistent trend strength, stronger revenue momentum, and a clearer catalyst path through AI-driven data center demand, all of which align with the signals AI models typically weight heavily. CSR offers a higher income yield and lower volatility, but its softer growth, mixed FFO results, and unresolved acquisition situation create less conviction in trend consistency. This assessment is probabilistic rather than definitive — relative positioning could shift if apartment fundamentals improve or if Iron Mountain's valuation and leverage weigh on sentiment.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The RSI Indicator for CSR moved into overbought territory on November 02, 2026. Be on the watch for a price drop or consolidation in the future -- when this happens, think about selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CSR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 57%.
CSR broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 20, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on CSR as a result. In 62 of 94 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CSR just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where CSR's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 27 of 42 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
CSR moved above its 50-day moving average on October 02, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +2.37% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where CSR advanced for three days, in 151 of 286 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 53%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 85 of 197 cases where CSR Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 43%.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 14 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 48 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. CSR’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 87 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 98 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.461) is normal, around the industry mean (2.200). P/E Ratio (46.227) is within average values for comparable stocks, (18.375). CSR's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (40.892) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (6.621). Dividend Yield (0.052) settles around the average of (0.237) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.552) is also within normal values, averaging (5.580).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CSR’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 96, placing this stock worse than average.
IRM moved above its 50-day moving average on October 27, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend. In 34 of 44 similar past instances, the stock price increased further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 27, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on IRM as a result. In 62 of 89 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for IRM just turned positive on October 26, 2026. Looking at past instances where IRM's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 31 of 44 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 70%.
The 10-day moving average for IRM crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 02, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 10 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 71%.
Following a +2.64% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where IRM advanced for three days, in 258 of 373 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 3 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where IRM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 56%.
IRM broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 29, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for IRM entered a downward trend on October 27, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 2 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 26 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 78, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 49 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. IRM’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 60 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: IRM's P/B Ratio (-26.769) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (1.723). IRM has a moderately high P/E Ratio (81.688) as compared to the industry average of (28.036). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.100) is also within normal values, averaging (2.612). Dividend Yield (0.030) settles around the average of (0.044) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.448) is also within normal values, averaging (5.594).
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
CSR | IRM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 60 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 44 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
IRM's Valuation (60) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CSR (98). This means that IRM’s stock grew somewhat faster than CSR’s over the last 12 months.
IRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSR (100). This means that IRM’s stock grew significantly faster than CSR’s over the last 12 months.
IRM's SMR Rating (2) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSR (87). This means that IRM’s stock grew significantly faster than CSR’s over the last 12 months.
CSR's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as IRM (49). This means that CSR’s stock grew similarly to IRM’s over the last 12 months.
CSR's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is significantly better than the same rating for IRM (97). This means that CSR’s stock grew significantly faster than IRM’s over the last 12 months.
| CSR | IRM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 53% | 6 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 59% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CSR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while IRM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CSR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IRM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CSR (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а +3.92% price change this week, while IRM (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was +1.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.95%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.84%.
CSR is expected to report earnings on Feb 23, 2027.
IRM is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
@Specialty Telecommunications (-1.48% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSR has been loosely correlated with STAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSR jumps, then STAG could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IRM has been closely correlated with DLR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IRM jumps, then DLR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IRM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IRM | 100% | +1.31% | ||
| DLR - IRM | 70% Closely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| EQIX - IRM | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| CSR - IRM | 63% Loosely correlated | -3.23% | ||
| KIM - IRM | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| DBRG - IRM | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||