CSWC
Price
$21.90
Change
-$0.16 (-0.73%)
Updated
Apr 3, 02:41 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.07B
53 days until earnings call
FSK
Price
$20.96
Change
-$0.33 (-1.55%)
Updated
Apr 3, 02:40 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.31B
34 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CSWC vs FSK

Header iconCSWC vs FSK Comparison
Open Charts CSWC vs FSKBanner chart's image
Capital Southwest
Price$21.90
Change-$0.16 (-0.73%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.07B
FS KKR Capital
Price$20.96
Change-$0.33 (-1.55%)
Volume$5.31K
Capitalization5.31B
CSWC vs FSK Comparison Chart
Loading...
CSWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CSWC vs. FSK commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CSWC is a Buy and FSK is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CSWC: $22.06 vs. FSK: $21.29)
Brand notoriety: CSWC and FSK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CSWC: 86% vs. FSK: 117%
Market capitalization -- CSWC: $1.07B vs. FSK: $5.31B
CSWC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.07B. FSK’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CSWC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFSK’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • CSWC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FSK’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the long-term than CSWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CSWC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CSWC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FSK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSK is a better buy in the short-term than CSWC.

Price Growth

CSWC (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.09% price change this week, while FSK (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

CSWC is expected to report earnings on May 26, 2025.

FSK is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.86% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSK($5.31B) has a higher market cap than CSWC($1.07B). CSWC has higher P/E ratio than FSK: CSWC (10.56) vs FSK (7.65). CSWC YTD gains are higher at: 4.159 vs. FSK (1.359). CSWC has less debt than FSK: CSWC (678M) vs FSK (8.19B). FSK has higher revenues than CSWC: FSK (779M) vs CSWC (114M).
CSWCFSKCSWC / FSK
Capitalization1.07B5.31B20%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.1591.359306%
P/E Ratio10.567.65138%
Revenue114M779M15%
Total CashN/A223M-
Total Debt678M8.19B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CSWC vs FSK: Fundamental Ratings
CSWC
FSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1064
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
156
SMR RATING
1..100
2811
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1320
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSK's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CSWC (99) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FSK’s stock grew significantly faster than CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (15) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (28) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

FSK's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CSWC (53) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FSK’s stock grew similarly to CSWC’s over the last 12 months.

CSWC's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FSK (20) in the null industry. This means that CSWC’s stock grew similarly to FSK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CSWCFSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CSWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ODVYX39.17N/A
N/A
Invesco Developing Markets Y
ABASX19.61N/A
N/A
AB Discovery Value A
IMIDX20.49N/A
N/A
Congress Mid Cap Growth Institutional
KSDVX15.76N/A
N/A
Keeley Small Cap Dividend Value A
GFSIX16.48N/A
N/A
Gabelli Global Financial Services I

FSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSK has been closely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSK jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSK
1D Price
Change %
FSK100%
-0.33%
MAIN - FSK
76%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
ARCC - FSK
74%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
SLRC - FSK
71%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
FDUS - FSK
69%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
HTGC - FSK
69%
Closely correlated
-0.21%
More