Advertisement
CTNT vs RLGT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTNT is a Hold and RLGT is a Hold.
| CTNT | RLGT | CTNT / RLGT | |
| Capitalization | 3.7M | 381M | 1% |
| EBITDA | -2.09M | 36.4M | -6% |
| Gain YTD | -99.508 | 28.436 | -350% |
| P/E Ratio | 697.00 | 24.64 | 2,829% |
| Revenue | 1.42M | 894M | 0% |
| Total Cash | 2.14M | 39.7M | 5% |
| Total Debt | 1.14M | 83.8M | 1% |
RLGT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 69 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CTNT | RLGT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 58% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTNT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while RLGT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CTNT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RLGT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTNT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RLGT’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CTNT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RLGT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CTNT (@Other Transportation) experienced а -7.20% price change this week, while RLGT (@Other Transportation) price change was -3.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Transportation industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.87%.
Reported Earning Dates
CTNT is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2026.
RLGT is expected to report earnings on Sep 14, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Transportation (-5.24% weekly)Other Transportation includes transportation services like providing airport ground transportation, airport management and equipment, shipping services, as well as businesses that operate bridges, expressways and other public services such as taxis and subways. Grupo Aero-pac, Corporacion America Airports S.A. and Matson, Inc. are some of the major companies operating in this space.
Advertisement
CTNT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CTNT and GXO have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTNT and GXO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTNT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTNT | 100% | +1.75% | ||
| GXO - CTNT | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| HUBG - CTNT | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| RLGT - CTNT | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.97% | ||
| CYRX - CTNT | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.83% | ||
| ZTO - CTNT | 14% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
More | ||||
RLGT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RLGT has been loosely correlated with XPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RLGT jumps, then XPO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RLGT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RLGT | 100% | -0.97% | ||
| XPO - RLGT | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| LSTR - RLGT | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| CJMB - RLGT | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.77% | ||
| GXO - RLGT | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
| FDX - RLGT | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
More | ||||