CTTAF
Price
$70.48
Change
+$0.73 (+1.05%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
13.29B
LEA
Price
$100.10
Change
-$1.34 (-1.32%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
5.33B
35 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTTAF vs LEA

Header iconCTTAF vs LEA Comparison
Open Charts CTTAF vs LEABanner chart's image
Continental AG
Price$70.48
Change+$0.73 (+1.05%)
Volume$117
Capitalization13.29B
Lear
Price$100.10
Change-$1.34 (-1.32%)
Volume$652.43K
Capitalization5.33B
CTTAF vs LEA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTTAF vs. LEA commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTTAF is a Buy and LEA is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CTTAF: $70.48 vs. LEA: $100.10)
Brand notoriety: CTTAF and LEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTTAF: 21% vs. LEA: 99%
Market capitalization -- CTTAF: $13.29B vs. LEA: $5.33B
CTTAF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $13.29B. LEA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $5.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $90.03B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTTAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLEA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTTAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LEA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CTTAF and LEA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTTAF’s TA Score shows that 8 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LEA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTTAF’s TA Score: 8 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • LEA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTTAF is a better buy in the short-term than LEA.

Price Growth

CTTAF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +1.22% price change this week, while LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -2.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

LEA is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.43% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTTAF($13.3B) has a higher market cap than LEA($5.33B). LEA has higher P/E ratio than CTTAF: LEA (14.16) vs CTTAF (10.81). CTTAF YTD gains are higher at: 34.910 vs. LEA (8.270). CTTAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.38B vs. LEA (1.26B). CTTAF has higher revenues than LEA: CTTAF (39.6B) vs LEA (17.3B).
CTTAFLEACTTAF / LEA
Capitalization13.3B5.33B250%
EBITDA4.38B1.26B346%
Gain YTD34.9108.270422%
P/E Ratio10.8114.1676%
Revenue39.6B17.3B229%
Total CashN/A888M-
Total DebtN/A2.79B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTTAF vs LEA: Fundamental Ratings
CTTAF
LEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2060
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
5377
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4560
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7526
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LEA's Valuation (19) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CTTAF (31) in the null industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as CTTAF (100) in the null industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAF's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as LEA (77) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CTTAF’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

CTTAF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as LEA (60) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that CTTAF’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.

LEA's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTTAF (75) in the null industry. This means that LEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTTAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTTAFLEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTTAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNWFX92.57N/A
N/A
American Funds New World 529F
LVOQX17.35N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities R2
VALSX35.31N/A
N/A
Value Line Select Growth Fund
WELIX11.26N/A
N/A
William Blair Emerging Mkts Ldrs R6
FSIUX28.30N/A
N/A
Invesco Dividend Income R5

CTTAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTTAF has been loosely correlated with CTTAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTTAF jumps, then CTTAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTTAF
1D Price
Change %
CTTAF100%
+1.04%
CTTAY - CTTAF
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
VLEEY - CTTAF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
MGA - CTTAF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
VC - CTTAF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.87%
LEA - CTTAF
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
More

LEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LEA has been closely correlated with ADNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LEA jumps, then ADNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LEA
1D Price
Change %
LEA100%
-1.32%
ADNT - LEA
78%
Closely correlated
-1.50%
VC - LEA
77%
Closely correlated
-1.87%
MGA - LEA
77%
Closely correlated
+0.69%
BWA - LEA
76%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
APTV - LEA
70%
Closely correlated
-0.52%
More