Lear Corporation (LEA) and Magna International Inc. (MGA) are leading automotive suppliers navigating a dynamic industry marked by electrification trends and supply chain shifts. This stock comparison evaluates their recent market positioning, financial metrics, and sector influences, offering insights for investors seeking exposure to cyclical auto parts. Traders focused on value plays or momentum opportunities in the consumer cyclical space may find value in assessing relative performance, risk profiles, and growth drivers amid ongoing vehicle production recovery.
Lear Corporation (LEA) specializes in automotive seating systems and electrical distribution (E-Systems), serving major original equipment manufacturers globally. The company reported record operating performance in its fiscal 2025 fourth quarter, with adjusted earnings per share of $12.80 and sales up 5% year-over-year to $6 billion, driven by contributions from both segments. In recent market activity, LEA shares have shown momentum, rising about 9% over the past four weeks despite earlier post-earnings pressure. Trading near $126 with a 52-week range of $83 to $143, the stock's forward P/E of 8.7 and Zacks Rank #2 (Buy) reflect undervaluation perceptions. Sentiment has improved on operational efficiencies and analyst estimate upgrades, though auto sector headwinds like production cuts temper gains.
Magna International Inc. (MGA) is a diversified automotive supplier offering body exteriors, powertrain, vision systems, seating, and complete vehicle assembly across four segments. Its fiscal 2025 Q4 delivered sales of $10.8 billion (up 2% year-over-year), adjusted EBIT margin expansion to 7.5%, and EPS of $2.18, beating expectations. Over recent weeks, MGA shares have climbed around 12% in the past month and 17% year-to-date (YTD), reaching a near four-year high earlier in the year. At approximately $62 within a 52-week range of $33 to $70, the stock benefits from a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy), forward P/E of 9.0, and robust backlog in ADAS (advanced driver-assistance systems) and EV components. Positive sentiment stems from margin improvements and upcoming Q1 earnings anticipation.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from its library of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. These bots, including AI Trading Signal Agents, Virtual Agents, and Brokerage Agents, are highlighted for their adaptability to current environments, offering real-time signals, copy trading options, and risk management tools. Engineered for high-growth sectors, they provide varying performance profiles suited to swing trading, day trading, or long-term holds. Investors can explore these bots to enhance strategies amid volatile markets like auto suppliers. Visit the page to discover bots potentially aligned with stocks like LEA and MGA.
Both LEA and MGA operate in the auto parts sector, but MGA's broader portfolio—including power & vision and complete vehicles—offers greater diversification versus LEA's focused seating and E-Systems emphasis. Growth drivers overlap in electrification and ADAS, yet MGA's larger engineering backlog positions it for EV upside. Recent momentum favors MGA with superior YTD and one-year returns (88% annually), while LEA provides relative stability via lower beta. Risk factors include sector cyclicality and OEM production volumes, with MGA's higher debt-to-equity (52%) contrasting LEA's 67%. Market sentiment leans positive for both as value plays, though MGA's scale and dividend edge appeal to income seekers, balancing LEA's cheaper trailing valuation.
Tickeron's AI analysis currently leans toward MGA based on stronger trend consistency, YTD outperformance, margin expansion, and catalysts like impending Q1 earnings. MGA's relative positioning in diversified auto exposure and higher analyst optimism suggest greater near-term upside probability, though LEA's value metrics and lower volatility merit consideration for conservative portfolios. Observable factors point to MGA's edge in the prevailing market environment.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LEA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LEA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
LEA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -2.58% price change this week, while MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -1.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.84%.
LEA is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
MGA is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.
| LEA | MGA | LEA / MGA | |
| Capitalization | 7.05B | 18B | 39% |
| EBITDA | 1.41B | 3.38B | 42% |
| Gain YTD | 24.208 | 25.697 | 94% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.07 | 27.83 | 51% |
| Revenue | 23.5B | 42.3B | 56% |
| Total Cash | 882M | 1.61B | 55% |
| Total Debt | 2.74B | 6.7B | 41% |
LEA | MGA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 15 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MGA's Valuation (9) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as LEA (12). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.
MGA's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as LEA (100). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.
LEA's SMR Rating (69) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MGA (84). This means that LEA’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.
MGA's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as LEA (42). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.
MGA's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as LEA (28). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to LEA’s over the last 12 months.
| LEA | MGA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 65% | 7 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 68% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AR.X | 2.001409 | 0.046656 | +2.39% |
| Arweave cryptocurrency | |||
| BNT.X | 0.266061 | 0.001767 | +0.67% |
| Bancor cryptocurrency | |||
| DOGE.X | 0.082406 | 0.000234 | +0.28% |
| Dogecoin cryptocurrency | |||
| OGN.X | 0.016233 | -0.000301 | -1.82% |
| Origin Protocol cryptocurrency | |||
| PDA.X | 0.000947 | -0.000086 | -8.35% |
| PlayDapp cryptocurrency | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGA has been loosely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MGA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MGA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MGA | 100% | +0.93% | ||
| LEA - MGA | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| VC - MGA | 63% Loosely correlated | +5.44% | ||
| CPS - MGA | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| APTV - MGA | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| THRM - MGA | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.78% | ||
More | ||||