It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTVA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTVA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CTVA (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а -3.19% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -2.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.11%.
CTVA is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
CTVA | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CTVA | HELX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 7 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago55% | 2 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago60% | 14 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago56% | about 1 month ago84% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago77% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SNOV | 24.90 | 0.39 | +1.59% |
FT Vest U.S. Sm Cp Mod Buf ETF -Nov | |||
ROUS | 57.14 | 0.40 | +0.71% |
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | |||
XPAY | 54.99 | 0.27 | +0.48% |
Roundhill S&P 500 Target 20 Managed Distribution ETF | |||
GSIE | 41.43 | 0.08 | +0.19% |
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Intl Eq ETF | |||
RAYC | 17.89 | -0.27 | -1.50% |
Rayliant Quantamental China Equity ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTVA has been loosely correlated with FMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTVA jumps, then FMC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CTVA | 100% | +0.03% | ||
FMC - CTVA | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
MOS - CTVA | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
IPI - CTVA | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
NTR - CTVA | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
SMG - CTVA | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that HELX and AZTA have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HELX and AZTA's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HELX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HELX | 100% | +1.74% | ||
AZTA - HELX | 19% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
CTVA - HELX | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
SLP - HELX | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.85% | ||
IQV - HELX | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.88% | ||
FLGT - HELX | 8% Poorly correlated | +2.07% | ||
More |