It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CTVA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CTVA’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CTVA (@Chemicals: Agricultural) experienced а +2.75% price change this week, while SMG (@Chemicals: Agricultural) price change was -3.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Agricultural industry was -4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.67%.
CTVA is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.
SMG is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
The agricultural chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemical products for the agricultural industry applications like crop protection, animal health, biotechnology and pharmaceutical-related products. Some of the largest agricultural chemicals producers include Nutrien Ltd., Corteva Inc., and FMC Corporation.
CTVA | SMG | CTVA / SMG | |
Capitalization | 40.3B | 4.23B | 953% |
EBITDA | 2.54B | -207.6M | -1,222% |
Gain YTD | 11.871 | -16.565 | -72% |
P/E Ratio | 44.37 | 11.45 | 387% |
Revenue | 17.2B | 3.44B | 501% |
Total Cash | 2.74B | 10.4M | 26,365% |
Total Debt | 2.49B | 3.02B | 82% |
CTVA | SMG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 74 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 18 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SMG's Valuation (74) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as CTVA (77) in the null industry. This means that SMG’s stock grew similarly to CTVA’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SMG (100) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew significantly faster than SMG’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's SMR Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as SMG (97) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew similarly to SMG’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMG (81) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMG’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMG (86) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that CTVA’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMG’s over the last 12 months.
CTVA | SMG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago58% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 7 days ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago55% | 13 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago83% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CTVA has been loosely correlated with IPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CTVA jumps, then IPI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CTVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CTVA | 100% | +0.99% | ||
IPI - CTVA | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.48% | ||
FMC - CTVA | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
NTR - CTVA | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
MOS - CTVA | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
SMG - CTVA | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
More |