Compare trend and price CULP vs WQTEF
Loading...
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CULP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWQTEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CULP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WQTEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CULP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- CULP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
CULP (@Textiles) experienced а +1.11% price change this week, while WQTEF (@Textiles) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Textiles industry was -2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
CULP is expected to report earnings on Jun 12, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Textiles (-2.33% weekly)The textiles industry includes companies that spin fiber and weave fabrics into raw products such as polyester filaments and staple yarns that are manufactured into finished products. Albany International Corp., Unifi, Inc. and Culp, Inc. are some of the major players in this business.
| CULP | WQTEF | CULP / WQTEF | |
| Capitalization | 59.9M | 210M | 29% |
| EBITDA | -4.97M | -512.98M | 1% |
| Gain YTD | -21.244 | -64.103 | 33% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.29 | 3.56 | 345% |
| Revenue | 237M | 17.1B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 13.5M | 10.8B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 5.18M | 2.78B | 0% |
CULP | WQTEF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 58 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 32 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WQTEF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as CULP (38) in the Textiles industry. This means that WQTEF’s stock grew similarly to CULP’s over the last 12 months.
WQTEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CULP (100) in the Textiles industry. This means that WQTEF’s stock grew similarly to CULP’s over the last 12 months.
WQTEF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CULP (94) in the Textiles industry. This means that WQTEF’s stock grew similarly to CULP’s over the last 12 months.
CULP's Price Growth Rating (75) in the Textiles industry is in the same range as WQTEF (88) in the null industry. This means that CULP’s stock grew similarly to WQTEF’s over the last 12 months.
WQTEF's P/E Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CULP (98) in the Textiles industry. This means that WQTEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CULP’s over the last 12 months.
| CULP | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
CULP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CULP and AIN have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CULP and AIN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CULP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CULP | 100% | -1.08% | ||
| AIN - CULP | 17% Poorly correlated | -9.68% | ||
| UFI - CULP | 13% Poorly correlated | +3.11% | ||
| WQTEF - CULP | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DXYN - CULP | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.71% |
WQTEF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WQTEF and CULP have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WQTEF and CULP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WQTEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WQTEF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CULP - WQTEF | 11% Poorly correlated | -1.08% | ||
| DXYN - WQTEF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.71% | ||
| AIN - WQTEF | 2% Poorly correlated | -9.68% | ||
| UFI - WQTEF | -4% Poorly correlated | +3.11% |