| CUT | ILIT | CUT / ILIT | |
| Gain YTD | -0.367 | -11.194 | 3% |
| Net Assets | 30.5M | 14.4M | 212% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.47 | 162% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 47.00 | 55% |
| Yield | 2.41 | 2.06 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 3 years | - |
| CUT | ILIT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 79% | 20 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 88% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and CLW have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and CLW's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILIT has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILIT jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILIT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILIT | 100% | -2.87% | ||
| SQM - ILIT | 72% Closely correlated | -3.60% | ||
| SGML - ILIT | 65% Loosely correlated | -5.66% | ||
| LI - ILIT | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.37% | ||
| ALB - ILIT | 9% Poorly correlated | -3.43% | ||
| LAR - ILIT | 9% Poorly correlated | -8.74% | ||
More | ||||