Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs LITP
CUT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs LITP
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$30.53
Change-$0.08 (-0.26%)
Volume$2K
Net Assets44.19M
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$7.94
Change+$0.09 (+1.15%)
Volume$1.03K
Net Assets21.36M
CUT vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. LITP commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUT has more net assets: 44.2M vs. LITP (21.4M). LITP has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: LITP (17.522) vs CUT (-3.321). CUT was incepted earlier than LITP: CUT (18 years) vs LITP (3 years). LITP (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). LITP has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CUT | LITP | CUT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | -3.321 | 17.522 | -19% |
| Net Assets | 44.2M | 21.4M | 207% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.65 | 114% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 49.00 | 65% |
| Yield | 3.11 | 5.41 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -0.69% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 75% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 73% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
More | ||||