Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs LITP
CUT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs LITP
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$27.65
Change-$0.08 (-0.29%)
Volume$620
Net Assets36.36M
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$12.17
Change+$0.41 (+3.49%)
Volume$410
Net Assets33.93M
CUT vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. LITP commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUT has more net assets: 36.4M vs. LITP (33.9M). LITP has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: LITP (76.048) vs CUT (-12.425). CUT was incepted earlier than LITP: CUT (18 years) vs LITP (3 years). LITP (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). LITP has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CUT | LITP | CUT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | -12.425 | 76.048 | -16% |
| Net Assets | 36.4M | 33.9M | 107% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.65 | 114% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 49.00 | 65% |
| Yield | 3.44 | 4.31 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 16 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 72% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +3.14% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 70% Closely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 68% Closely correlated | -3.05% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 57% Loosely correlated | +4.61% | ||
More | ||||