| CUT | LITP | CUT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | -2.777 | 0.778 | -357% |
| Net Assets | 30.6M | 45.3M | 68% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.65 | 117% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 40.00 | 65% |
| Yield | 2.56 | 7.16 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 3 years | - |
| CUT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 80% | 20 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 9 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and LPX have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and LPX's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SGML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SGML could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | N/A | ||
| SGML - LITP | 68% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ATLX - LITP | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AN - LITP | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
| CRML - LITP | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ESS - LITP | 34% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||