| CUT | LITP | CUT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | -3.106 | -5.163 | 60% |
| Net Assets | 31.1M | 37.9M | 82% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.65 | 117% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 40.00 | 65% |
| Yield | 2.56 | 7.16 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 3 years | - |
| CUT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 15 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and AVY have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and AVY's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SGML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SGML could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | N/A | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| ATLX - LITP | 56% Loosely correlated | -5.37% | ||
| AN - LITP | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| CRML - LITP | 41% Loosely correlated | -6.29% | ||
| ESS - LITP | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.04% | ||
More | ||||