Advertisement
CV vs QDEL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CV is a StrongBuy and QDEL is a Hold.
| CV | QDEL | CV / QDEL | |
| Capitalization | 331M | 809M | 41% |
| EBITDA | -29.56M | -379M | 8% |
| Gain YTD | -38.260 | -58.753 | 65% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 13.9M | 2.67B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 9.08M | 123M | 7% |
| Total Debt | 687K | 3.08B | 0% |
QDEL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 52 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CV | QDEL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 24 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 79% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while QDEL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- QDEL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QDEL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- QDEL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CV (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +10.18% price change this week, while QDEL (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -15.68% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -5.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.66%.
Reported Earning Dates
CV is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
QDEL is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-5.01% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
Advertisement
CV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CV and QDEL have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CV and QDEL's prices will move in lockstep.
QDEL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QDEL has been loosely correlated with AZTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QDEL jumps, then AZTA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QDEL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QDEL | 100% | -3.05% | ||
| AZTA - QDEL | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.22% | ||
| XRAY - QDEL | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| RVTY - QDEL | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.79% | ||
| DHR - QDEL | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| A - QDEL | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.66% | ||
More | ||||