It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CVGW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePFGC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CVGW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PFGC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CVGW (@Food Distributors) experienced а -5.46% price change this week, while PFGC (@Food Distributors) price change was -4.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Distributors industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.98%.
CVGW is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.
PFGC is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
Food distributors function as intermediaries between food manufacturers and food service operators (such as chefs, restaurants, beverage managers, cafeterias, industrial caterers, hospitals and nursing homes). Food distribution companies buy, store and then supply food items to the food service operators, thereby allowing the latter to have access to a wide range of food items from various manufacturers. Sysco Corporation, US Foods Holding Corp. and Herbalife Nutrition Ltd. are some of the biggest (by market cap) U.S. companies in this segment. Most food service operators buy from local, specialty, and/or broad line food service distributors on a daily or weekly basis. With the rise in e-commerce, consumers are increasingly expecting lower prices, faster service, and higher quality – something that potentially creates the impetus on distribution networks to raise their game.
CVGW | PFGC | CVGW / PFGC | |
Capitalization | 487M | 11.5B | 4% |
EBITDA | 18.1M | 1.35B | 1% |
Gain YTD | -9.538 | 23.138 | -41% |
P/E Ratio | 105.26 | 27.04 | 389% |
Revenue | 967M | 57.9B | 2% |
Total Cash | 5.66M | 16.4M | 35% |
Total Debt | 71.1M | 5.04B | 1% |
CVGW | PFGC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 66 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PFGC's Valuation (68) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as CVGW (93) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that PFGC’s stock grew similarly to CVGW’s over the last 12 months.
PFGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Food Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CVGW (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that PFGC’s stock grew significantly faster than CVGW’s over the last 12 months.
PFGC's SMR Rating (66) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as CVGW (89) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that PFGC’s stock grew similarly to CVGW’s over the last 12 months.
PFGC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as CVGW (57) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that PFGC’s stock grew similarly to CVGW’s over the last 12 months.
PFGC's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Food Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for CVGW (97) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that PFGC’s stock grew significantly faster than CVGW’s over the last 12 months.
CVGW | PFGC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago54% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago70% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago71% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago69% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago68% | 15 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago76% | 3 days ago69% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago78% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
SLVO | 77.70 | -0.33 | -0.42% |
UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered CallETN | |||
ICOP | 26.69 | -0.26 | -0.96% |
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF | |||
CHAU | 14.78 | -0.40 | -2.64% |
Direxion Dly CSI 300 CHN A Shr Bl 2X ETF | |||
AXS.X | 7.255346 | -0.336439 | -4.43% |
Axie Infinity cryptocurrency | |||
AUDIO.X | 0.187067 | -0.010576 | -5.35% |
Audius cryptocurrency |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVGW has been loosely correlated with AVO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVGW jumps, then AVO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CVGW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CVGW | 100% | -1.66% | ||
AVO - CVGW | 53% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
ANDE - CVGW | 31% Poorly correlated | -1.92% | ||
PFGC - CVGW | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.31% | ||
USFD - CVGW | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
SPTN - CVGW | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.15% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFGC has been closely correlated with USFD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFGC jumps, then USFD could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFGC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PFGC | 100% | -2.54% | ||
USFD - PFGC | 77% Closely correlated | -2.37% | ||
SYY - PFGC | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
CHEF - PFGC | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.80% | ||
ANDE - PFGC | 43% Loosely correlated | -4.50% | ||
SPTN - PFGC | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.31% | ||
More |