CVLT
Price
$119.76
Change
+$2.07 (+1.76%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
5.28B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZM
Price
$78.63
Change
+$0.21 (+0.27%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Capitalization
23.53B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CVLT vs ZM

Header iconCVLT vs ZM Comparison
Open Charts CVLT vs ZMBanner chart's image
Commvault Systems
Price$119.76
Change+$2.07 (+1.76%)
Volume$573.62K
Capitalization5.28B
Zoom Communications
Price$78.63
Change+$0.21 (+0.27%)
Volume$2.95M
Capitalization23.53B
CVLT vs ZM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVLT vs. ZM commentary
Nov 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVLT is a Hold and ZM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2025
Stock price -- (CVLT: $119.76 vs. ZM: $78.63)
Brand notoriety: CVLT: Not notable vs. ZM: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVLT: 68% vs. ZM: 113%
Market capitalization -- CVLT: $5.28B vs. ZM: $23.53B
CVLT [@Packaged Software] is valued at $5.28B. ZM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $23.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $277.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVLT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CVLT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CVLT is a better buy in the long-term than ZM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CVLT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CVLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • ZM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CVLT is a better buy in the short-term than ZM.

Price Growth

CVLT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.98% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was -6.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -3.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

CVLT is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2026.

ZM is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-3.58% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ZM($23.5B) has a higher market cap than CVLT($5.28B). CVLT has higher P/E ratio than ZM: CVLT (68.05) vs ZM (20.69). ZM YTD gains are higher at: -3.652 vs. CVLT (-20.641). ZM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.11B vs. CVLT (97.7M). ZM has more cash in the bank: 7.78B vs. CVLT (1.06B). ZM has less debt than CVLT: ZM (54.3M) vs CVLT (908M). ZM has higher revenues than CVLT: ZM (4.75B) vs CVLT (1.1B).
CVLTZMCVLT / ZM
Capitalization5.28B23.5B22%
EBITDA97.7M1.11B9%
Gain YTD-20.641-3.652565%
P/E Ratio68.0520.69329%
Revenue1.1B4.75B23%
Total Cash1.06B7.78B14%
Total Debt908M54.3M1,672%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CVLT vs ZM: Fundamental Ratings
CVLT
ZM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5670
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45100
SMR RATING
1..100
2856
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9072
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1277
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ZM's Valuation (74) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CVLT (88). This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to CVLT’s over the last 12 months.

CVLT's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (100). This means that CVLT’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.

CVLT's SMR Rating (28) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as ZM (56). This means that CVLT’s stock grew similarly to ZM’s over the last 12 months.

ZM's Price Growth Rating (72) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CVLT (90). This means that ZM’s stock grew similarly to CVLT’s over the last 12 months.

CVLT's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ZM (77). This means that CVLT’s stock grew somewhat faster than ZM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CVLTZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CVLT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMFBX60.520.49
+0.82%
American Funds American Mutual R2
GLRIX23.74N/A
N/A
James Balanced: Golden Rainbow Instl
WAYEX18.47N/A
N/A
Waycross Managed Risk Equity Fund
ASVYX9.45N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Value Y
GAAHX20.91N/A
N/A
GMO Resources R6

CVLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVLT has been loosely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVLT jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVLT
1D Price
Change %
CVLT100%
+1.76%
SNPS - CVLT
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
FFIV - CVLT
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.71%
CRWD - CVLT
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.12%
CYBR - CVLT
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
DT - CVLT
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
More

ZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZM
1D Price
Change %
ZM100%
+0.27%
COIN - ZM
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
CLSK - ZM
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.61%
RNG - ZM
59%
Loosely correlated
+4.48%
FRSH - ZM
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.80%
DT - ZM
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
More