COIN
Price
$188.11
Change
+$8.63 (+4.81%)
Updated
Aug 25, 03:08 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
47.35B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZM
Price
$104.83
Change
-$2.60 (-2.42%)
Updated
Aug 24 closing price
Capitalization
30.74B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

COIN vs ZM

COIN vs ZM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 24, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Coinbase (COIN) vs. Zoom (ZM) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Coinbase (COIN) has shown stronger recent momentum driven by cryptocurrency market rallies and regulatory developments, while Zoom (ZM) has delivered steadier year-to-date gains amid AI product expansions.
  • COIN's business remains closely tied to trading volumes and crypto asset prices, creating higher volatility compared to ZM's more diversified communications platform with recurring revenue.
  • Recent market activity has favored COIN with double-digit daily gains amid Bitcoin strength, whereas ZM has traded in a narrower range ahead of its upcoming quarterly results.
  • Sector exposure differs markedly: COIN benefits from digital asset adoption and potential policy clarity, while ZM focuses on enterprise collaboration tools and artificial intelligence enhancements.
  • Risk profiles contrast, with COIN facing crypto-cycle sensitivity and ZM contending with slower post-pandemic growth in core video conferencing demand.
  • Relative performance in recent weeks highlights COIN's outperformance in momentum-driven environments versus ZM's emphasis on operational stability and product innovation.

Introduction

This comparison examines COIN and ZM to provide traders and investors with an objective view of their relative positioning in the current market environment. Coinbase Global, Inc. operates a leading cryptocurrency exchange platform, while Zoom Communications, Inc. delivers video communications and collaboration software. The analysis focuses on business models, recent performance trends, growth drivers, and risk factors that may influence investor decisions. Market participants seeking exposure to digital assets or enterprise technology may find this stock comparison relevant for assessing diversification opportunities and sector-specific opportunities.

COIN Overview and Recent Performance

Coinbase Global, Inc. provides a platform for buying, selling, and storing cryptocurrencies, along with related services including staking, derivatives, and institutional offerings. In recent weeks, COIN experienced notable upward price movement amid broader cryptocurrency strength, with the stock closing at $186.49 on August 21, 2026, after an 8.20% gain. Year-to-date returns reached approximately 17.53%, supported by Bitcoin's advance above $70,000 and discussions around regulatory clarity measures. Sentiment has been influenced by policy developments and exchange-traded fund inflows, though the stock remains sensitive to trading volume fluctuations and broader digital asset cycles.

ZM Overview and Recent Performance

Zoom Communications, Inc. offers video, voice, chat, and collaboration solutions primarily for enterprise and education users, with ongoing expansions into artificial intelligence features. ZM has posted solid year-to-date returns of about 24.19% through recent market activity, trading near $107.16 as of August 21, 2026. Performance has been supported by new AI-driven product launches such as revenue acceleration tools and virtual agent capabilities. The company is scheduled to report fiscal second-quarter results shortly, with analysts anticipating modest revenue growth in a maturing post-pandemic environment for core communications services.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a curated selection of AI trading bots designed for various market conditions and strategies. The platform offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only the strongest performers suited to prevailing conditions appear in the Trending AI Robots section. Available bots demonstrate a range of statistics, including annualized returns reaching over 200% in select cases, win rates between 70% and 87%, and varying timeframes from minutes to hours. Each robot employs distinct trading styles, risk parameters, and ticker sets, allowing users to review detailed performance metrics before engaging. Review the full selection of Trending AI Robots to identify options aligned with individual objectives.

Head-to-Head Comparison

COIN and ZM operate in distinct sectors with contrasting business models. Coinbase derives the majority of revenue from transaction fees tied to cryptocurrency trading volumes, exposing it to high volatility but also to growth in digital asset adoption. Zoom generates recurring subscription revenue from its communications platform, offering greater predictability yet facing slower expansion in mature markets. Recent momentum has favored COIN amid crypto rallies and regulatory attention, while ZM has emphasized product innovation through AI integrations. Risk factors include COIN's sensitivity to Bitcoin price swings and ZM's exposure to competition in collaboration software. Market sentiment reflects COIN's higher beta to risk assets versus ZM's more defensive positioning within the technology sector.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency and recent catalysts, Tickeron’s AI models would likely assign a higher probabilistic preference to COIN in the near term due to stronger momentum alignment with cryptocurrency market advances and policy-related developments. ZM presents a more stable profile with lower volatility, which could appeal in risk-averse scenarios. The assessment remains probabilistic and reflects current positioning rather than any guarantee of future outcomes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
COIN vs. ZM commentary
Aug 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is COIN is a Buy and ZM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 25, 2026
Stock price -- (COIN: $179.48 vs. ZM: $104.83)
Brand notoriety: COIN: Not notable vs. ZM: Notable
COIN represents the Financial Publishing/Services, while ZM is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: COIN: 134% vs. ZM: 131%
Market capitalization -- COIN: $47.35B vs. ZM: $30.74B
COIN [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $47.35B. ZM’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $30.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $128.36B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $253.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $41.39B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $10.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

COIN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileZM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • COIN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • ZM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ZM is a better buy in the long-term than COIN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

COIN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ZM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • COIN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ZM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, COIN is a better buy in the short-term than ZM.

Price Growth

COIN (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +19.22% price change this week, while ZM (@Packaged Software) price change was -0.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.21%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

COIN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

ZM is expected to report earnings on Aug 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+1.65% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

@Packaged Software (+0.89% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
COIN($47.4B) has a higher market cap than ZM($30.7B). COIN has higher P/E ratio than ZM: COIN (60.14) vs ZM (15.44). ZM YTD gains are higher at: 21.486 vs. COIN (-20.633). ZM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.32B vs. COIN (-901.23M). COIN has more cash in the bank: 9.02B vs. ZM (7.72B). ZM has less debt than COIN: ZM (60.2M) vs COIN (6.67B). COIN has higher revenues than ZM: COIN (6.28B) vs ZM (4.93B).
COINZMCOIN / ZM
Capitalization47.4B30.7B154%
EBITDA-901.23M1.32B-68%
Gain YTD-20.63321.486-96%
P/E Ratio60.1415.44390%
Revenue6.28B4.93B127%
Total Cash9.02B7.72B117%
Total Debt6.67B60.2M11,076%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ZM: Fundamental Ratings
ZM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
85
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
43
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
COINZM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
COIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NHTC1.750.06
+3.55%
Natural Health Trends Corp
INSW99.950.43
+0.43%
International Seaways
TAK18.240.06
+0.33%
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited
MCBS35.51-0.09
-0.25%
MetroCity Bankshares
FJET3.79-0.11
-2.82%
Starfighters Space Inc.

ZM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ZM has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ZM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ZM
1D Price
Change %
ZM100%
-2.42%
COIN - ZM
63%
Loosely correlated
-3.76%
CLSK - ZM
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
ASAN - ZM
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
COMP - ZM
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.70%
RIOT - ZM
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
More