CW
Price
$572.71
Change
+$5.96 (+1.05%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
21.15B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HEI
Price
$316.10
Change
-$9.38 (-2.88%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
37.33B
103 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CW vs HEI

CW vs HEI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 24, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Curtiss-Wright (CW) vs. HEICO (HEI) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Curtiss-Wright (CW) has delivered stronger year-to-date and one-year returns compared with HEICO (HEI), reflecting robust order growth in defense and commercial aerospace markets.
  • Both companies operate in the aerospace and defense sector, with HEICO emphasizing aftermarket parts and services while Curtiss-Wright focuses on engineered components and systems.
  • Recent quarterly results showed Curtiss-Wright raising full-year guidance, supported by a book-to-bill ratio above 1.0x, while HEICO reported sustained aftermarket demand amid industry recovery.
  • Valuation metrics indicate HEICO trades at a premium, consistent with its higher historical growth profile, whereas Curtiss-Wright offers a comparatively balanced risk-reward profile in the current environment.
  • Market sentiment for both remains tied to defense spending trends and commercial aviation recovery, with limited sector-specific divergence observed in recent weeks.
  • Relative performance favors Curtiss-Wright on momentum measures, though HEICO maintains advantages in margin stability and aftermarket recurring revenue.

Introduction

Investors and traders seeking exposure to the aerospace and defense sector often evaluate companies with overlapping end markets but distinct business models. Curtiss-Wright (CW) and HEICO (HEI) both supply critical components and services to commercial and military aviation, making them natural candidates for relative-value analysis. This comparison highlights differences in growth drivers, recent price behavior, and positioning amid evolving defense budgets and air-travel demand. Portfolio managers, sector specialists, and quantitative traders may find the analysis useful when constructing or rebalancing positions within industrials or aerospace allocations.

CW Overview and Recent Performance

Curtiss-Wright Corporation designs and manufactures engineered products for aerospace, defense, and power-generation markets. In recent market activity, the stock has benefited from strong order intake and earnings momentum. First-quarter results featured double-digit sales growth and an improved operating margin, prompting management to raise full-year guidance for sales, operating margin, earnings per share, and free cash flow. Second-quarter performance further reinforced this trajectory, with revenue and earnings exceeding consensus expectations. Price action over recent weeks has reflected this fundamental strength, with the shares maintaining an upward bias relative to broader market indices despite periodic volatility tied to macroeconomic data.

HEI Overview and Recent Performance

HEICO Corporation provides aerospace components, electronic systems, and aftermarket repair services, with a significant portion of revenue derived from recurring aftermarket activity. Recent results highlighted continued strength in aftermarket demand, supporting revenue growth even as new-equipment cycles fluctuate. The stock has posted more modest year-to-date gains compared with peers, reflecting a pullback from earlier highs amid broader valuation compression in high-multiple growth names. Market activity in recent weeks has shown resilience around key support levels, supported by the company’s track record of margin stability and acquisition-driven expansion.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots drawn from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions—based on backtested performance, risk-adjusted returns, and adaptability—earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of styles, strategies, timeframes, and ticker universes, with historical win rates, profit factors, and drawdown statistics varying significantly by bot. Traders can review detailed metrics for each strategy before deployment. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page to identify bots suited to individual risk parameters and market views.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Business models diverge meaningfully: Curtiss-Wright emphasizes high-specification components and integrated systems with long development cycles, while HEICO focuses on replacement parts and repair services that generate higher-margin recurring revenue. Growth drivers for Curtiss-Wright include defense platform upgrades and commercial engine demand, whereas HEICO benefits from fleet aging and aftermarket penetration. Recent momentum has favored Curtiss-Wright, with superior total returns over trailing periods. Risk factors for both include exposure to government procurement cycles and supply-chain constraints, though HEICO’s aftermarket orientation may provide relative insulation during new-build slowdowns. Sector sentiment remains constructive for both, yet Curtiss-Wright’s broader end-market mix offers modest diversification advantages in the current environment.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of outperformance to Curtiss-Wright (CW) over the near term. Stronger order trends and guidance revisions provide clearer visibility into forward growth, supporting a more stable technical profile compared with HEICO’s valuation-sensitive price action. This assessment reflects probabilistic weighting of recent data rather than a definitive forecast.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CW vs. HEI commentary
Sep 09, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CW is a Hold and HEI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2026
Stock price -- (CW: $572.71 vs. HEI: $316.10)
Brand notoriety: CW and HEI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CW: 143% vs. HEI: 115%
Market capitalization -- CW: $21.15B vs. HEI: $37.33B
CW [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $21.15B. HEI’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $37.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $2.02T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $40.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHEI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HEI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CW is a better buy in the long-term than HEI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HEI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HEI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CW is a better buy in the short-term than HEI.

Price Growth

CW (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -0.91% price change this week, while HEI (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -2.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

CW is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

HEI is expected to report earnings on Dec 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (+1.14% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HEI($37.3B) has a higher market cap than CW($21.2B). HEI has higher P/E ratio than CW: HEI (52.68) vs CW (39.42). CW YTD gains are higher at: 3.960 vs. HEI (-2.243). HEI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.47B vs. CW (852M). CW has more cash in the bank: 477M vs. HEI (241M). CW has less debt than HEI: CW (1.15B) vs HEI (2.54B). HEI has higher revenues than CW: HEI (5.18B) vs CW (3.65B).
CWHEICW / HEI
Capitalization21.2B37.3B57%
EBITDA852M1.47B58%
Gain YTD3.960-2.243-177%
P/E Ratio39.4252.6875%
Revenue3.65B5.18B71%
Total Cash477M241M198%
Total Debt1.15B2.54B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CW vs HEI: Fundamental Ratings
CW
HEI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2322
SMR RATING
1..100
4748
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6560
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4973
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CW's Valuation (64) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HEI (72). This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to HEI’s over the last 12 months.

HEI's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as CW (23). This means that HEI’s stock grew similarly to CW’s over the last 12 months.

CW's SMR Rating (47) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HEI (48). This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to HEI’s over the last 12 months.

HEI's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as CW (65). This means that HEI’s stock grew similarly to CW’s over the last 12 months.

CW's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HEI (73). This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to HEI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWHEI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 28 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
CW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HEI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AZI1.280.04
+3.23%
Autozi Internet Technology (Global) Ltd
NAUT0.930.02
+2.54%
Nautilus Biotechnolgy
MATV12.56-0.10
-0.79%
Mativ Holdings
USFD103.09-0.95
-0.91%
US Foods Holding Corp
SXI271.63-4.15
-1.50%
Standex International Corp

CW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CW has been closely correlated with BWXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CW jumps, then BWXT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CW
1D Price
Change %
CW100%
+1.05%
BWXT - CW
77%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
HWM - CW
68%
Closely correlated
-10.70%
AIR - CW
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.31%
DCO - CW
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
ATRO - CW
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.34%
More

HEI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HEI has been loosely correlated with GE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HEI jumps, then GE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HEI
1D Price
Change %
HEI100%
-2.88%
GE - HEI
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
LOAR - HEI
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.22%
HWM - HEI
55%
Loosely correlated
-10.70%
VSEC - HEI
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
CW - HEI
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
More