Investors and traders seeking exposure to the aerospace and defense sector often evaluate companies with overlapping end markets but distinct business models. Curtiss-Wright (CW) and HEICO (HEI) both supply critical components and services to commercial and military aviation, making them natural candidates for relative-value analysis. This comparison highlights differences in growth drivers, recent price behavior, and positioning amid evolving defense budgets and air-travel demand. Portfolio managers, sector specialists, and quantitative traders may find the analysis useful when constructing or rebalancing positions within industrials or aerospace allocations.
Curtiss-Wright Corporation designs and manufactures engineered products for aerospace, defense, and power-generation markets. In recent market activity, the stock has benefited from strong order intake and earnings momentum. First-quarter results featured double-digit sales growth and an improved operating margin, prompting management to raise full-year guidance for sales, operating margin, earnings per share, and free cash flow. Second-quarter performance further reinforced this trajectory, with revenue and earnings exceeding consensus expectations. Price action over recent weeks has reflected this fundamental strength, with the shares maintaining an upward bias relative to broader market indices despite periodic volatility tied to macroeconomic data.
HEICO Corporation provides aerospace components, electronic systems, and aftermarket repair services, with a significant portion of revenue derived from recurring aftermarket activity. Recent results highlighted continued strength in aftermarket demand, supporting revenue growth even as new-equipment cycles fluctuate. The stock has posted more modest year-to-date gains compared with peers, reflecting a pullback from earlier highs amid broader valuation compression in high-multiple growth names. Market activity in recent weeks has shown resilience around key support levels, supported by the company’s track record of margin stability and acquisition-driven expansion.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI trading bots drawn from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions—based on backtested performance, risk-adjusted returns, and adaptability—earn placement in this section. Available bots span a wide range of styles, strategies, timeframes, and ticker universes, with historical win rates, profit factors, and drawdown statistics varying significantly by bot. Traders can review detailed metrics for each strategy before deployment. Explore the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page to identify bots suited to individual risk parameters and market views.
Business models diverge meaningfully: Curtiss-Wright emphasizes high-specification components and integrated systems with long development cycles, while HEICO focuses on replacement parts and repair services that generate higher-margin recurring revenue. Growth drivers for Curtiss-Wright include defense platform upgrades and commercial engine demand, whereas HEICO benefits from fleet aging and aftermarket penetration. Recent momentum has favored Curtiss-Wright, with superior total returns over trailing periods. Risk factors for both include exposure to government procurement cycles and supply-chain constraints, though HEICO’s aftermarket orientation may provide relative insulation during new-build slowdowns. Sector sentiment remains constructive for both, yet Curtiss-Wright’s broader end-market mix offers modest diversification advantages in the current environment.
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of outperformance to Curtiss-Wright (CW) over the near term. Stronger order trends and guidance revisions provide clearer visibility into forward growth, supporting a more stable technical profile compared with HEICO’s valuation-sensitive price action. This assessment reflects probabilistic weighting of recent data rather than a definitive forecast.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHEI’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HEI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CW (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -0.91% price change this week, while HEI (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -2.78% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.04%.
CW is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
HEI is expected to report earnings on Dec 21, 2026.
Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| CW | HEI | CW / HEI | |
| Capitalization | 21.2B | 37.3B | 57% |
| EBITDA | 852M | 1.47B | 58% |
| Gain YTD | 3.960 | -2.243 | -177% |
| P/E Ratio | 39.42 | 52.68 | 75% |
| Revenue | 3.65B | 5.18B | 71% |
| Total Cash | 477M | 241M | 198% |
| Total Debt | 1.15B | 2.54B | 45% |
CW | HEI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 64 Fair valued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 47 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CW's Valuation (64) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HEI (72). This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to HEI’s over the last 12 months.
HEI's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as CW (23). This means that HEI’s stock grew similarly to CW’s over the last 12 months.
CW's SMR Rating (47) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HEI (48). This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to HEI’s over the last 12 months.
HEI's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as CW (65). This means that HEI’s stock grew similarly to CW’s over the last 12 months.
CW's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as HEI (73). This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to HEI’s over the last 12 months.
| CW | HEI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 49% | 5 days ago 58% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 54% | 5 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 50% | 5 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 57% | 5 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 69% | 28 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 45% | 7 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 5 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 62% | 5 days ago 68% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CW has been closely correlated with BWXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CW jumps, then BWXT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HEI has been loosely correlated with GE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HEI jumps, then GE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HEI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEI | 100% | -2.88% | ||
| GE - HEI | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| LOAR - HEI | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| HWM - HEI | 55% Loosely correlated | -10.70% | ||
| VSEC - HEI | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.38% | ||
| CW - HEI | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
More | ||||