Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs FGILX
CWGCX vs FGILX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs FGILX
CWGCX vs FGILX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. FGILX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and FGILX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. FGILX (477M). FGILX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: FGILX (0.89) vs CWGCX (0.71). CWGCX was incepted earlier than FGILX: CWGCX (26 years) vs FGILX (14 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FGILX (0.91). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FGILX (19.00). FGILX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: FGILX (0) vs CWGCX (250). FGILX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.89 vs. CWGCX (10.62). FGILX return over 5 years is better than : 49.18 vs. CWGCX (28.85).
| CWGCX | FGILX | CWGCX / FGILX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.91 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.91 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.442 | 11.323 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 477M | 33,124% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.89 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.62 | 14.89 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.27 | 65.58 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.85 | 49.18 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.68 | 144.53 | 63% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement