Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWGCX vs FGILX
CWGCX vs FGILX Comparison
Open Charts CWGCX vs FGILX
CWGCX vs FGILX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWGCX vs. FGILX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWGCX is a Buy and FGILX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWGCX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. FGILX (472M). FGILX pays higher dividends than CWGCX: FGILX (0.89) vs CWGCX (0.72). CWGCX was incepted earlier than FGILX: CWGCX (25 years) vs FGILX (14 years). CWGCX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FGILX (0.91). CWGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FGILX (19.00). FGILX has a lower initial minimum investment than CWGCX: FGILX (0) vs CWGCX (250). FGILX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.92 vs. CWGCX (14.67). FGILX return over 5 years is better than : 50.57 vs. CWGCX (29.13).
| CWGCX | FGILX | CWGCX / FGILX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.91 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.48 | 0.91 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.549 | 10.919 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 158B | 472M | 33,475% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.89 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.67 | 19.92 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.83 | 59.77 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.13 | 50.57 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.43 | 142.44 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement